We are seriously going to agree to disagree about Bladerunner 2049. That movie was about as good as you could have gotten.
I very much enjoyed Dune 2. Zendaya was the only part that I felt was over played. I thought the scenes with her and Paul getting to know each other were good. The rest of it where she is constantly pissed gets way to much time in the movie. They could have cut 10 minutes of her out and the movie would have been the better for it. Yes, one could argue for cutting her completely out but.....
We can discuss 2049 in its own thread, how it basically violated the Bladerunner world to tell its own weird, terrible, noir-ish story, if someone who didn't know what noir was trying to make a noir/noir-esque movie but the first one was, you know.
As far as Dune 2 goes, in addition to ruining Chani, played terribly by the Z-girl, they also didn't get Paul; DV pulled a bunch of elements forward from Dune Messiah into the story of Dune because "modern audiences" etc. What I meant by "on the page" was the each character was played by the actor as they were written and as the director wanted: Zendayah's Chani is cunty because in addition to her limited skills, the script didn't give her much with which to work. Paul's characterization is also wrong; he is a bitch and too self-aware until he drinks the Water of Life. Aragorn's change from book to movie works because Viggo makes the reluctant hero seem plausible; he is courageous in the moment but this mantle as king seems distant and removed for him. His ancestor the last King was 3500+ years ago, known only from story and failure, succumbing to the One Ring.
With Paul, making him reluctant doesn't work in the same way. He was directly the Duke's son; he has seen the power being wielded and can see the future and the past; The reason given in the Dune movies ("I see holy war spreading across the universe like an unquenchable fire. A warrior religion that waves the Atreides banner in my father's name" for me at least doesn't carry the same weight. I absolutely hated the North/South Fremen setup. Feyd also felt wrong to me, his whole lispy affectation seemed weird and off. The fight with Feyd was also not great; the whole second battle sequence was just OK.
I am just rehashing my many complaints about the movie; which was OK divorced from the book as I have said previously but not amazing in its own right. For me, DV is a good director, technically talented but I don't think his command of story or theme puts him in the same class as Nolan or other greats.