iannis
Musty Nester
With super good CGI.This movie was just Hollywood trying to make a movie about the bullshit Mexican border.
Without the CGI District 9 would have been just another "uhh..." foreign film. Same thing here pretty much.
It's not that I think his social commentary points are bad. It's that I think he's very bad at making them. But he's really good with CGI.
They're really just not very good as stories. Over reliance on the social justice angle to cover what are mostly unintelligible flaws in structure. It's been said before in this thread and I think I agree. This is the most cynical man working in film. I can't help but feel this is what you get when you mash together Michael Moore and Michael Bay.
Edit: To be more charitable, both of these movies feel a lot like those american late 50's sci-fi movies with the social message. The ones with the voice over at the end that go, "And so we shall prosper in the face of nuclear annhilation." or "And so it is that the worst enemy of Man is Man himself". But I don't think he's a full bore Tarrantino, "Fuck what you like. You're not the boss of me. I'm the one making this movie" cinema-nerd. I think he's just making money off the people who really probably DID think that these were deep stories with a deep humanist message.