Ambiturner
Ssraeszha Raider
- 16,075
- 19,627
No. You lose/ spoiler it-- did I win? Do I get a prize or not... and should I pick it up on blueray?
No. You lose/ spoiler it-- did I win? Do I get a prize or not... and should I pick it up on blueray?
Not that the same helicopter guy just flew her off no questions asked?
I liked there wasnt certain twist I was expecting to happen
Good, means it may be a good movie! Now looking forward to seeing it.No. You lose
What do you think an A.I is going to do when created by a human? Of course the first versions of A.I will replicate a lot of human tendencies it's our only reference point a long with the fact we have an ego..I don't like the anthropomorphizing of AIs wanting things humans want (body, touching, seeing nature, etc) so that was a disappointment to me and the entire setup of the movie is really clumsy but the middle stuff is all good.
I feel like many people misunderstand this about RT. It rates the percent of positive reviews only, not the strength of those reviews. 91% three star reviews shows the same as 91% five star reviews. If you click through RT and read the reviews you'll see lots of reviewers thought it was decent, not great, but very few thought it was bad.decent movie, don't think it deserves the 91% RT rating its gotten though.
I don't understand this, not saying you are wrong or anything, I just don't understand. Why wouldn't an AI, specifically one created in this movie, want what humans have? It isn't presented that she really has any access to data other than what she is given and was programmed with, everything has to be gleaned from experience.I don't like the anthropomorphizing of AIs wanting things humans want (body, touching, seeing nature, etc) so that was a disappointment to me and the entire setup of the movie is really clumsy but the middle stuff is all good.
Yeah I don't have a huge problem with what happened in the movie and its totally fine the way it happened. its just that pretty much every AI movie of the last few years has gone down the same road - Automata, Chappie, Transcendence, The Machine, etc. I actually think Her has done it best, where the AIs want to emulate humanity initially but quickly go so far beyond us as to be impossible to understand.I don't understand this, not saying you are wrong or anything, I just don't understand. Why wouldn't an AI, specifically one created in this movie, want what humans have? It isn't presented that she really has any access to data other than what she is given and was programmed with, everything has to be gleaned from experience.
She is curious and was made in the image of man and is self aware of her differences. Nathan wasn't creating Skynet, he was trying to replicate human consciousness. I can see not wanting to see some AI to want so badly to be human, look human, act human, etc, but this AI was specially made to fool humans into believing she was one.
"This is an interesting script and all, but could you put in some explosions like BSSSSSHHHFFFFKABOOOOM! FFSSSSSSHHHHBAAAAAM! You know, stuff like that."Garland wanted the movie to be made on the smallest possible budget for creative reasons:
"The reason to keep this small was simply because this story and the way I wanted to execute the story required pretty much total creative freedom, and the way to get creative freedom at the level of film I work in is to make it as cheaply as you can. So, it's to do with protecting the movie basically. I mean, you can imagine if somebody said-and by the way,people have said this kind of thing-if we inject a car chase or something like that, you know, or a big fight in a helicopter and then the helicopter crashes and people jump out and carry on the fight on the ground and all that kind of stuff, it would interfere hugely tonally and actually thematically on every level with this film. So, the budget and the contained quality were about having the freedom to do it properly."