FOH Shower Thoughts

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Edaw

Banne̶d
<Gold Donor>
14,350
98,591
Addendum to Patent Application for Resonance Disruption Device

Title: Addendum - Repurposing Common Components for Construction of Resonance Disruption Device

Field of Addendum: This addendum details an alternative method for constructing the Resonance Disruption Device (RDD) using readily available components, including a repurposed shotgun, a car battery, and common sound devices.

Summary of Addendum: The following describes the adaptation of existing technologies and items into a makeshift resonance disruption weapon:
Detailed Description of the Repurposed Embodiment:
  • Shotgun Body:
    • Barrel and Stock: The shotgun’s barrel serves as the housing for the acoustic transducer, utilizing its length and possibly modifying its inner diameter to enhance acoustic focusing. The stock can be adapted to hold control electronics and power management components.
    • Trigger Mechanism: The trigger can be reconfigured to act as a switch for initiating the acoustic emission, providing an intuitive interface for the user.
  • Car Battery:
    • Power Source: A car battery provides the necessary voltage and current to power the acoustic transducers. It can be connected via a modified electrical system, ensuring high current delivery for brief, intense sound bursts.
    • Backpack Adaptation: The battery can be housed in a backpack or similar structure, allowing for portability and ease of use in the field.
  • Sound Devices:
    • Transducers: Instead of specialized transducers, high-frequency tweeters or piezo buzzers can be used, which are capable of producing frequencies in the ultrasonic range when driven by suitable amplifiers.
    • Amplification: Existing car audio amplifiers or similar devices can be repurposed to boost the signal from a control unit to the sound devices, providing the power needed for acoustic disruption.
  • Control Unit:
    • Frequency Generator: A microcontroller or a repurposed frequency generator from an electronic device can be used to create and modulate the frequencies required for resonance.
    • Feedback Loop: Simple sensors (like microphones or accelerometers) can be integrated to provide feedback on the acoustic impact, allowing for manual or automatic tuning of frequencies.
Operation:
  • Upon pulling the trigger, the control unit would send a signal to the amplifiers, which drive the transducers to emit ultrasonic waves. The frequency would be adjusted based on feedback or pre-set for targeting biological water content.
Claims:
  1. A method of constructing a Resonance Disruption Device comprising:
    • Repurposing a shotgun to house acoustic transducers and control electronics;
    • Utilizing a car battery as a power source, configured for high current delivery to acoustic components;
    • Employing common sound devices, such as tweeters or piezo buzzers, as transducers for ultrasonic emission;
    • Using a modified or repurposed control unit to generate and modulate ultrasonic frequencies.
  2. The method of claim 1, further including adapting the shotgun's trigger mechanism to act as a switch for initiating ultrasonic emission.
  3. The method of claim 1, wherein the sound devices are driven by repurposed car audio amplifiers to achieve the necessary acoustic power.
  4. The method of claim 1, including a feedback mechanism using simple sensors to adjust frequency output based on real-time acoustic impact.
Abstract: This addendum outlines a method for creating a Resonance Disruption Device by ingeniously repurposing a shotgun, car battery, and common sound devices, aiming to construct an economical yet potentially effective tool for targeting biological systems through acoustic resonance.
 

Bandwagon

Kolohe
<Silver Donator>
24,984
68,541
The hyphenated last name generation is coming of age. What are we gonna do when these people start marrying each other?
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Bandwagon

Kolohe
<Silver Donator>
24,984
68,541
The only time I look at a bad driver as I pass them is to see if they fit a stereotype.
thumbs-up-asian.gif
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
28,066
16,769
The hyphenated last name generation is coming of age. What are we gonna do when these people start marrying each other?
I'm guessing hyphenated names don't have a very favorable view of marriage.
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Edaw

Banne̶d
<Gold Donor>
14,350
98,591
Let’s explore how the current world order might evolve over 10, 20, 30, 50, and 100 years if every nation adopts a ruthless, capitalistic, and manifest destiny mindset. In this scenario, global cooperation collapses, replaced by bilateral agreements as the sole form of international interaction. Nations hoard technological advancements for leverage, driven by self-interest to expand influence, secure resources, and dominate others. We’ll examine economic, technological, security, and societal shifts, identify who stands out, and determine if humanity conquers the stars.

10 Years Out: Fragmentation and Power Blocs
  • Economic Landscape: Global trade splinters as nations prioritize bilateral deals favoring their interests. Powerful economies like the United States, China, and Germany exploit their leverage to lock in resources and markets. Smaller nations face predatory terms or isolation, leading to shortages in tech components and energy. Inflation spikes as supply chains falter.
  • Technological Race: AI, quantum computing, and biotech become key battlegrounds. Nations like the U.S. and China hoard breakthroughs, creating incompatible tech ecosystems. Cybersecurity escalates into a silent war, with state-sponsored hacking targeting rival advancements.
  • Security and Conflict: Resource wars ignite over rare earth minerals (e.g., Congo, Bolivia), water (e.g., Nile River basin), and energy (e.g., Arctic oil). The South China Sea turns into a flashpoint between China and U.S.-aligned states. Bilateral defense pacts emerge, but trust is scarce, fueling proxy conflicts in Africa and Southeast Asia.
  • Climate and Migration: Without global climate action, rising seas and extreme weather displace millions from coastal regions like Bangladesh and Florida. Border clashes erupt as nations reject refugees, exacerbating humanitarian crises.
  • Who Stands Out: China consolidates influence via an expanded Belt and Road Initiative, binding poorer nations into dependency. The U.S. leverages its tech and military to secure the Americas and parts of Asia. Russia exploits energy reserves but struggles economically.

20 Years Out: Superpower Dominance and Widening Gaps
  • Economic Landscape: The world splits into competing trade blocs led by superpowers. China’s network dominates Asia and Africa, while the U.S. enforces a Western Hemisphere trade zone. Smaller nations become economic vassals or collapse under unequal deals. Global wealth concentrates in a few hands.
  • Technological Divide: Leading nations deploy advanced AI for automation and surveillance, while others lag, unable to afford innovation. Biotech extends life expectancy for the rich, but access remains exclusive. Space tech advances, with early Lunar missions by the U.S. and China.
  • Security and Conflict: China asserts hegemony over Southeast Asia, clashing with India and U.S. allies. Russia expands into Eastern Europe, reviving old tensions. Nuclear proliferation accelerates as nations like Iran and Brazil seek deterrents. Proxy wars multiply in resource-rich regions.
  • Climate Crisis: Sea levels rise further, flooding cities like Miami and Shanghai. Wealthy nations experiment with geoengineering (e.g., solar radiation management), but side effects—like droughts in Africa—spark new conflicts.
  • Who Stands Out: China overtakes the U.S. in economic size, though the U.S. leads in AI and space. India rises as a regional power, aligning with the U.S. against China. The European Union fragments, with Germany and France vying for influence.

30 Years Out: Blocs, Bases, and the New Space Race
  • Economic Landscape: Economic blocs solidify under superpowers: China, the U.S., Russia, and India. Trade within blocs thrives, but inter-bloc commerce is hostile. Deep-sea and asteroid mining begin, controlled by leading nations, fueling a new resource boom.
  • Technological Arms Race: AI-driven warfare—think autonomous drones and cyberattacks—dominates. Space militarizes, with U.S. and Chinese Lunar bases and early Martian outposts. Biotech advances human augmentation (e.g., neural implants) for military and economic elites.
  • Security and Conflict: The Arctic, now ice-free, becomes a resource battleground. Private military companies (PMCs) hired by states run deniable ops in Africa and Latin America. Cyber warfare cripples grids and economies daily.
  • Societal Shifts: Nationalism surges, with state propaganda promoting genetic enhancements for superiority. Cultural exchange fades, replaced by insular, state-controlled narratives.
  • Who Stands Out: China and the U.S. enter a cold war, with space as the frontier. India excels in biotech, feeding its bloc. Russia plays spoiler with asymmetric tactics. Brazil emerges as South America’s hegemon.

50 Years Out: Resource Exhaustion and the Elite’s Escape
  • Economic Landscape: Earth’s resources dwindle, pushing space mining into overdrive. Asteroid harvests, dominated by China and the U.S., create a new commodities market. Wealth gaps widen—leading nations prosper, while others face societal collapse.
  • Technological Singularity: AI and biotech hit new heights. Brain-computer interfaces and genetic enhancements create an augmented elite, exclusive to wealthy nations. Quantum AI revolutionizes cryptography and strategy, giving leaders an edge.
  • Security and Conflict: Large-scale Earth wars decline as superpowers prioritize space. Smaller nations fracture into warlord states. PMCs and autonomous weapons police resource zones for the powerful.
  • Climate and Environment: Geoengineering stabilizes climates for the rich, but poorer regions suffer ecological fallout. Martian colonies and space habitats house the elite, abandoning Earth’s woes.
  • Who Stands Out: China and the U.S. lead space colonization with Lunar cities and Martian bases. India pioneers bioenhanced agriculture, sustaining its bloc. Russia powers expansion with energy but lags in population growth.

100 Years Out: Interstellar Ambitions and Earth’s Decline
  • Economic Landscape: Interstellar trade emerges as leading nations develop faster-than-light travel or generation ships. New worlds are colonized, sending resources back to Earth’s elite. Earth itself lies scarred by depletion and climate collapse.
  • Technological Evolution: Humanity diverges. Augmented humans with superior cognition and lifespans rule spacefaring nations, while the unaugmented struggle on Earth. AI governs economies and militaries autonomously.
  • Security and Conflict: Earth is sidelined, left to scavengers and minor states. Interstellar colonies vie for exoplanets and megastructures like Dyson spheres. Wars use AI fleets and relativistic weapons across star systems.
  • Societal Divergence: Spacefaring nations evolve into distinct subspecies via genetic engineering, creating “new humanities.” Earth’s survivors cling to a depleted planet.
  • Who Stands Out: China and the U.S. dominate the interstellar race, building colonial empires. India colonizes bio-rich worlds with its biotech prowess. Russia powers the expansion but trails. New powers—corporate or ideological splinter groups—rise in the stars.

Do We Conquer the Stars?
Yes, but it’s a fragmented triumph. A handful of nations—China, the U.S., India, and possibly Russia—lead humanity’s charge into the cosmos. They colonize star systems, extract resources, and evolve into advanced civilizations. This isn’t a united human endeavor; it’s a cutthroat race, with each power claiming its galactic slice. Earth, ravaged by neglect and conflict, becomes a relic as the strong abandon it for the stars.

Conclusion: A Future of Triumph and Tragedy
In this ruthless, capitalistic world, the powerful thrive, and the weak falter. Technological marvels—AI, biotech, space travel—elevate a select few, while climate change and resource wars devastate the rest. The stars are conquered, but by competing empires, not a collective humanity. China and the U.S. lead, with India and others carving niches. The future is stark: dazzling progress for the elite, collapse for the many, and a fractured conquest of the cosmos.
 

lurker

Vyemm Raider
1,736
4,222
Let’s explore how the current world order might evolve over 10, 20, 30, 50, and 100 years if every nation adopts a ruthless, capitalistic, and manifest destiny mindset. In this scenario, global cooperation collapses, replaced by bilateral agreements as the sole form of international interaction. Nations hoard technological advancements for leverage, driven by self-interest to expand influence, secure resources, and dominate others. We’ll examine economic, technological, security, and societal shifts, identify who stands out, and determine if humanity conquers the stars.

10 Years Out: Fragmentation and Power Blocs
  • Economic Landscape: Global trade splinters as nations prioritize bilateral deals favoring their interests. Powerful economies like the United States, China, and Germany exploit their leverage to lock in resources and markets. Smaller nations face predatory terms or isolation, leading to shortages in tech components and energy. Inflation spikes as supply chains falter.
  • Technological Race: AI, quantum computing, and biotech become key battlegrounds. Nations like the U.S. and China hoard breakthroughs, creating incompatible tech ecosystems. Cybersecurity escalates into a silent war, with state-sponsored hacking targeting rival advancements.
  • Security and Conflict: Resource wars ignite over rare earth minerals (e.g., Congo, Bolivia), water (e.g., Nile River basin), and energy (e.g., Arctic oil). The South China Sea turns into a flashpoint between China and U.S.-aligned states. Bilateral defense pacts emerge, but trust is scarce, fueling proxy conflicts in Africa and Southeast Asia.
  • Climate and Migration: Without global climate action, rising seas and extreme weather displace millions from coastal regions like Bangladesh and Florida. Border clashes erupt as nations reject refugees, exacerbating humanitarian crises.
  • Who Stands Out: China consolidates influence via an expanded Belt and Road Initiative, binding poorer nations into dependency. The U.S. leverages its tech and military to secure the Americas and parts of Asia. Russia exploits energy reserves but struggles economically.

20 Years Out: Superpower Dominance and Widening Gaps
  • Economic Landscape: The world splits into competing trade blocs led by superpowers. China’s network dominates Asia and Africa, while the U.S. enforces a Western Hemisphere trade zone. Smaller nations become economic vassals or collapse under unequal deals. Global wealth concentrates in a few hands.
  • Technological Divide: Leading nations deploy advanced AI for automation and surveillance, while others lag, unable to afford innovation. Biotech extends life expectancy for the rich, but access remains exclusive. Space tech advances, with early Lunar missions by the U.S. and China.
  • Security and Conflict: China asserts hegemony over Southeast Asia, clashing with India and U.S. allies. Russia expands into Eastern Europe, reviving old tensions. Nuclear proliferation accelerates as nations like Iran and Brazil seek deterrents. Proxy wars multiply in resource-rich regions.
  • Climate Crisis: Sea levels rise further, flooding cities like Miami and Shanghai. Wealthy nations experiment with geoengineering (e.g., solar radiation management), but side effects—like droughts in Africa—spark new conflicts.
  • Who Stands Out: China overtakes the U.S. in economic size, though the U.S. leads in AI and space. India rises as a regional power, aligning with the U.S. against China. The European Union fragments, with Germany and France vying for influence.

30 Years Out: Blocs, Bases, and the New Space Race
  • Economic Landscape: Economic blocs solidify under superpowers: China, the U.S., Russia, and India. Trade within blocs thrives, but inter-bloc commerce is hostile. Deep-sea and asteroid mining begin, controlled by leading nations, fueling a new resource boom.
  • Technological Arms Race: AI-driven warfare—think autonomous drones and cyberattacks—dominates. Space militarizes, with U.S. and Chinese Lunar bases and early Martian outposts. Biotech advances human augmentation (e.g., neural implants) for military and economic elites.
  • Security and Conflict: The Arctic, now ice-free, becomes a resource battleground. Private military companies (PMCs) hired by states run deniable ops in Africa and Latin America. Cyber warfare cripples grids and economies daily.
  • Societal Shifts: Nationalism surges, with state propaganda promoting genetic enhancements for superiority. Cultural exchange fades, replaced by insular, state-controlled narratives.
  • Who Stands Out: China and the U.S. enter a cold war, with space as the frontier. India excels in biotech, feeding its bloc. Russia plays spoiler with asymmetric tactics. Brazil emerges as South America’s hegemon.

50 Years Out: Resource Exhaustion and the Elite’s Escape
  • Economic Landscape: Earth’s resources dwindle, pushing space mining into overdrive. Asteroid harvests, dominated by China and the U.S., create a new commodities market. Wealth gaps widen—leading nations prosper, while others face societal collapse.
  • Technological Singularity: AI and biotech hit new heights. Brain-computer interfaces and genetic enhancements create an augmented elite, exclusive to wealthy nations. Quantum AI revolutionizes cryptography and strategy, giving leaders an edge.
  • Security and Conflict: Large-scale Earth wars decline as superpowers prioritize space. Smaller nations fracture into warlord states. PMCs and autonomous weapons police resource zones for the powerful.
  • Climate and Environment: Geoengineering stabilizes climates for the rich, but poorer regions suffer ecological fallout. Martian colonies and space habitats house the elite, abandoning Earth’s woes.
  • Who Stands Out: China and the U.S. lead space colonization with Lunar cities and Martian bases. India pioneers bioenhanced agriculture, sustaining its bloc. Russia powers expansion with energy but lags in population growth.

100 Years Out: Interstellar Ambitions and Earth’s Decline
  • Economic Landscape: Interstellar trade emerges as leading nations develop faster-than-light travel or generation ships. New worlds are colonized, sending resources back to Earth’s elite. Earth itself lies scarred by depletion and climate collapse.
  • Technological Evolution: Humanity diverges. Augmented humans with superior cognition and lifespans rule spacefaring nations, while the unaugmented struggle on Earth. AI governs economies and militaries autonomously.
  • Security and Conflict: Earth is sidelined, left to scavengers and minor states. Interstellar colonies vie for exoplanets and megastructures like Dyson spheres. Wars use AI fleets and relativistic weapons across star systems.
  • Societal Divergence: Spacefaring nations evolve into distinct subspecies via genetic engineering, creating “new humanities.” Earth’s survivors cling to a depleted planet.
  • Who Stands Out: China and the U.S. dominate the interstellar race, building colonial empires. India colonizes bio-rich worlds with its biotech prowess. Russia powers the expansion but trails. New powers—corporate or ideological splinter groups—rise in the stars.

Do We Conquer the Stars?
Yes, but it’s a fragmented triumph. A handful of nations—China, the U.S., India, and possibly Russia—lead humanity’s charge into the cosmos. They colonize star systems, extract resources, and evolve into advanced civilizations. This isn’t a united human endeavor; it’s a cutthroat race, with each power claiming its galactic slice. Earth, ravaged by neglect and conflict, becomes a relic as the strong abandon it for the stars.

Conclusion: A Future of Triumph and Tragedy
In this ruthless, capitalistic world, the powerful thrive, and the weak falter. Technological marvels—AI, biotech, space travel—elevate a select few, while climate change and resource wars devastate the rest. The stars are conquered, but by competing empires, not a collective humanity. China and the U.S. lead, with India and others carving niches. The future is stark: dazzling progress for the elite, collapse for the many, and a fractured conquest of the cosmos.
You take really long showers.
 
  • 2Worf
  • 1Like
Reactions: 2 users

Sylas

<Gold Donor>
4,198
5,473
How did we fuck up AI so badly that it gets to write screenplays, make art, generate movies, and design video games while i'm still stuck fucking around with spreadsheets 50 hours a week?
 
  • 1Worf
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

Control

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
3,582
9,573
How did we fuck up AI so badly that it gets to write screenplays, make art, generate movies, and design video games while i'm still stuck fucking around with spreadsheets 50 hours a week?
Well, those happen to be the things were it's perfectly ok to just copy other things and/or just make shit up. So as it turns out, perfect for ai.
The trouble comes in when you actually need ai to be correct.
Once ai comes for the spreadsheets, things are going to get, um, interesting.
glitch pixel GIF by haydiroket (Mert Keskin)
 

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
28,066
16,769
When I see someone with a lot of kids I always think it's because of one of 3 reasons.
1. It's a religious thing
2. They don't know where babies come from
3. They want a donor for each organ that might fail.
 

1987

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
3,694
8,405
I want an AI detective game that involves you using your phone to scan locations for clues to solve a mystery.