Get a free Kyle Rittenhouse at Culver's

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nirgon

Nirgon

Log Wizard
14,255
23,043
Cad said:
Dunno about that one. Link to story/filings? My guess is they're trying to show intent that they went out there to kill him if they had posted/texted about him before. Hard to say without details.
Click to expand...

They wouldn't allow Aubrey's history of pretending to jog as a front for stealing, yet allowed racist texts/FB communication between the charged guys in Georgia. I'll hafta try to find it again.

Seems to be a lot of inconsistency but maybe there's finer points reasons in how things are defined.
 
BoozeCube

BoozeCube

The Wokest
<Prior Amod>
52,364
307,150
Nirgon said:
thepostmillennial.com

Kyle Rittenhouse made ‘reasonable’ decision to shoot: expert testimony

At a pretrial hearing on Tuesday, a use-of-force expert stated that Kyle Rittenhouse’s actions during the Kenosha riots last year were justified.
thepostmillennial.com thepostmillennial.com
Click to expand...

4148903107bace20574c9d10fd9978e52897b184142b32af928dae98f87b2065_1.jpg
 
  • 5Like
  • 4Solidarity
  • 2Truth!
Reactions: 10 users
jayrebb

jayrebb

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
14,778
14,734
Nirgon said:
thepostmillennial.com

Kyle Rittenhouse made ‘reasonable’ decision to shoot: expert testimony

At a pretrial hearing on Tuesday, a use-of-force expert stated that Kyle Rittenhouse’s actions during the Kenosha riots last year were justified.
thepostmillennial.com thepostmillennial.com
Click to expand...

Has there been a motion to dismiss on that basis?

Why is the judge allowing this to go to trial if there is video with expert testimony on each shot fired being consistent with self-defense against a lethal threat?

Does the jury really need to hear an argument about how the man with the gun pointing at Kyle didn't intend to use it? It's completely unreasonable for Kyle to hold fire on any of those shots. No normal person in a normal state of mind would hold fire.
 
Cad

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,822
50,687
jayrebb said:
Has there been a motion to dismiss on that basis?

Why is the judge allowing this to go to trial if there is video with expert testimony on each shot fired being consistent with self-defense against a lethal threat?

Does the jury really need to hear an argument about how the man with the gun pointing at Kyle didn't intend to use it? It's completely unreasonable for Kyle to hold fire on any of those shots. No normal person in a normal state of mind would hold fire.
Click to expand...
Whether the use of force is reasonable is a fact question for the jury. The judge can't intervene in that and substitute his judgment.

The only time they can is if there is a statute which says use of force is always reasonable under these conditions (i.e. castle doctrine) and it's not disputed that those conditions existed.

This is going to go to a jury, and it'll depend on the jury makeup whether he gets a fair trial.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Rustled
Reactions: 2 users
Gavinmad

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,928
52,686
Why are you guys posting that as if it's news? No fucking shit the defense found an expert to say it was a reasonable use of force, and the prosecution will find an expert to say it wasn't.
 
Cad

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,822
50,687
Gavinmad said:
Why are you guys posting that as if it's news? No fucking shit the defense found an expert to say it was a reasonable use of force, and the prosecution will find an expert to say it wasn't.
Click to expand...
And the prosecutors expert will be a joke just like the one in the Chauvin trial, contradicting himself repeatedly and obviously twisting logic into a pretzel to try to form an opinion, but the biased jury won't care and will find him guilty of murder anyway.

It's all about the jury. And it's all about the judge striking jurors for cause who are obviously biased, which didn't happen in the Chauvin trial. There were BLM protestors on the jury.

People talk about lawyers and greedy plaintiffs but the problems in the legal system are 100% on the judges who don't enforce the rules (against people they don't like) and let things go off the rails.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
Gavinmad

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,928
52,686
Cad said:
And the prosecutors expert will be a joke just like the one in the Chauvin trial, contradicting himself repeatedly and obviously twisting logic into a pretzel to try to form an opinion, but the biased jury won't care and will find him guilty of murder anyway.

It's all about the jury. And it's all about the judge striking jurors for cause who are obviously biased, which didn't happen in the Chauvin trial. There were BLM protestors on the jury.

People talk about lawyers and greedy plaintiffs but the problems in the legal system are 100% on the judges who don't enforce the rules (against people they don't like) and let things go off the rails.
Click to expand...
I think he's in a much better position to be acquitted than Chauvin was.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Cad

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,822
50,687
Gavinmad said:
I think he's in a much better position to be acquitted than Chauvin was.
Click to expand...
The Rittenhouse judge from what I've seen seems a lot more fair than the Chauvin judge. It also depends on the makeup of the county. The jurors in Minneapolis were always going to be a shit show.
 
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 1 user
Gavinmad

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,928
52,686
Cad said:
The Rittenhouse judge from what I've seen seems a lot more fair than the Chauvin judge. It also depends on the makeup of the county. The jurors in Minneapolis were always going to be a shit show.
Click to expand...
He's also not a cop, the people he killed weren't black, and the video evidence is unambiguous. You'd need an egregiously biased jury to convict him of any serious crime.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
TJT

TJT

Mr. Poopybutthole
<Gold Donor>
43,191
110,697
Isnt like there's any shortage of biased wokesters in that area.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Furry

Furry

🌭🍔🇺🇦✌️SLAVA UKRAINI!✌️🇺🇦🍔🌭
<Gold Donor>
22,432
29,556
Gavinmad said:
I think he's in a much better position to be acquitted than Chauvin was.
Click to expand...
Yea chauvin had no chance at all. People were openly talking about hunting the jury down and shit. We all knew that trial would be a total farce. Kyles got a much better chance
 
Cad

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,822
50,687
Gavinmad said:
He's also not a cop, the people he killed weren't black, and the video evidence is unambiguous. You'd need an egregiously biased jury to convict him of any serious crime.
Click to expand...
A. Being a cop actually legitimizes what Chauvin was doing since he was, you know, doing his job.
B. Chauvin didn't kill anybody, so it doesn't matter what color they were.
C. The video evidence was also unambiguous in Chauvin's case; nothing he did caused the death of Floyd.

You would need an egregiously biased jury to convict either of them; but one already happened. I'm not ruling it out that it could happen again, it absolutely will.
 
  • 6Like
Reactions: 5 users
Zapatta

Zapatta

Krugman's Fax Machine
<Gold Donor>
83,771
439,846
Foler said:
Kinda hoping Kyle gets executed. Would make him into a martyr. Otherwise if he gets off he’ll just fade into nonexistence and his sacrifice for nothing.

#executekyle
Click to expand...

You have obviously never seen how many times Randy Weaver has gotten paid to come to a podunk gun shows all across the country.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users
Lanx

Lanx

<Prior Amod>
66,053
150,555
Cad said:
A. Being a cop actually legitimizes what Chauvin was doing since he was, you know, doing his job.
B. Chauvin didn't kill anybody, so it doesn't matter what color they were.
C. The video evidence was also unambiguous in Chauvin's case; nothing he did caused the death of Floyd.

You would need an egregiously biased jury to convict either of them; but one already happened. I'm not ruling it out that it could happen again, it absolutely will.
Click to expand...
half the chuvin jury were blackies

we all knew he was fucked when they had that affirmative action diversity quota
 
Zapatta

Zapatta

Krugman's Fax Machine
<Gold Donor>
83,771
439,846
Lanx said:
half the chuvin jury were blackies

we all knew he was fucked when they had that affirmative action diversity quota
Click to expand...

Get outside of Millwaukee and 50% of Blacks in Wisconsin are just very very dark White People, the other 50% are expat out of state former UW Badger football recruits who fucked up their college careers and got left stranded in mini ghettos across the highway from Circle Ks. They dress like Ice Cube circa 1990 and want nothing to do with a jury.
 
Cad

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,822
50,687
Lanx said:
half the chuvin jury were blackies

we all knew he was fucked when they had that affirmative action diversity quota
Click to expand...
I know, but thats my point. It's all about the jury. And who controls who gets on the jury? The judge.

You guys are sitting here going "its on video, there's no way!" The fucking medical examiner testified in Chauvin's case that Floyd died not because of anything Chauvin did. Still guilty in like 1 hour. Completely ridiculous, they had made up their mind before they went in there, just sorting out voting and chit chat takes 15-30 minutes. They didn't deliberate ANYTHING.
 
  • 2Like
  • 2Truth!
Reactions: 3 users
Kharzette

Kharzette

Watcher of Overs
5,421
4,384
There's an AI written by a former defense contractor that can select you a jury for whatever result you want
 
Status
Not open for further replies.