Khane_sl said:
1) My tenants pay 2/3 of my multi family mortgage AND they have to live in a first floor apartment and here me walking around, singing in the shower, and puking my guts up when I drink too much. They don't get any equity. Half of a mortgage is almost always going to be cheaper than prevailing rent rates anyway. Half of my mortgage is about $1000 and that's with PMI and escrow (property taxes, insurance and a little extra for those bastards at the bank) included. My tenants pay me $1500/mo and they don't even get the whole house to themselves, they have people living above them! Half of a mortgage is way more than fair.
That's a negotiated, arms length lease you have with your tenants. You're charging them rent, you're not charging them a portion of your mortgage. If your mortgage skyrockets or nosedives because of a big change in interest rates, it's not like you are directly applying the difference to their lease without them having the opportunity to say "fuck you, I'm moving somewhere else then." It's an entirely different situation than having a girlfriend move in. Your tenants do not give a single fuck about whether or not you have a mortgage on the place or own it outright. All they care about is what the lease rate or rent is, your underlying financial situation has no bearing on them.
Khane_sl said:
2) She is only paying half of the mortgage. She doesn't have to worry about anything else the homeowner has to worry about; e.g. Water heater, Roof, Electrical, Furnace, Lawn Care and Landscaping, Snow Removal, etc etc etc.
Actually, this was never really brought up or discussed to any great extent. Again, I would think that if you want things to be fair and or equitable, then either she pays what a market lease rate would be for the space (or half of it) and none of the maintenance and doesn't receive any equity, or you go balls deep and have her pay half the mortgage, half the maintenance, and she gets half the equity generated while she's living there.
Khane_sl said:
3) I seriously have to question anyone who thinks half isn't fair. Do you all think women need to be taken care of? Must you protect them from all the bad in this world and make sure they don't have to worry about anything except their makeup and what to make for dinner?
It has nothing to do with women being taken care of, for fuck's sake. It's incredibly simple. If you are both paying "half of everything" (including maintenance) and the relationship ends, she will have paid the same amount as you did and yet will have nothing to show for it while you have all the equity gained when she walks out the door. That is fundamentally unfair, and in fact is not "half" at all. She's been paying for half, and yet walks away with nothing while you have the equity.
Let's look at it another way. Pretend that you own your place outright, with no mortgage. Would it be "fair" for her to live with you rent free, just paying for half of the utilities and other monthly expenses? Personally, I don't think so. In that situation, she should still be paying whatever the rent for an equivalent space would be to you, because you've spent hundreds of thousands buying that home in the first place. Otherwise you're subsidizing her cost of living (and that's totally fine if you want to do that, but it is also fundamentally not fair or equitable).
I guess what I'm getting at is that there are two ways of treating this, one is either as a couple (whether legally married, common law, or just shacked up) that splits everything halfways including mortgage, maintenance and equity, or as a landlord/lessee where she pays an appropriate rent (regardless of what your mortgage is or isn't) and share of monthly expenses. Mixing the two together just doesn't make sense to me.