Gladiator 2

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Bandwagon

Kolohe
<Silver Donator>
24,350
65,512
edit: o it's real as covid
OIG2.QyWuZbmFFd2.jpeg
 

Palum

what Suineg set it to
26,764
41,974
This looks like a CGI nightmare film infused with random bullshit flavored rome history sprinkles. They're trying to do the star wars thing - are there only like 2 families in the entire world?
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Harshaw

Throbbing Member
25,477
133,398
I have no faith in the movie, but the popcorn bucket is pretty sweet.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Grabbit Allworth

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
1,731
7,361
The main character has absolutely no charisma.

Crow has become a fat slob, but Maximus Decimus Meridius was a true general of the fearless Northern legions...
 

Bald Brah

Trakanon Raider
1,240
1,576
Looks like CGI ass with some wokie shit throw in for good measure. Might be worth a torrent. Maybe.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Rajaah

Honorable Member
<Gold Donor>
12,604
16,691
Haven't seen the first in like a decade+, but it was a formative movie for me as a kid. I've got two dumb questions:

-Was Maximus always Lucius' father? The materials for this new movie say so, but I don't remember that being the case in the first movie. Thought it was more ambiguous than anything else (maybe even Commodus given how incestuous he felt towards his sister). This would mean Maximus cheated on his wife with Lucilla, which is hard to believe.

-Are these movies really historically accurate at all? I know they're based on real people/events, but then you have them going way off the reservation with things like Commodus being slain by Maximus in an arena when he was actually strangled in a bathtub.

1731612133484.png

Also, Lucius apparently came before Commodus in real life and was older than Commodus, which is a pretty goddamn big departure the first movie did from history.

1731612187752.png

The bad guys of the new movie followed two decades after Commodus (incidentally about as much time as has passed since the first movie) and granted citizenship to all the migrants in Rome lol. Looks like the new movie might be more accurate to history than the first, but the presence of Lucius in this era is still pretty weird. Unless there were two Luciuses.

Edit: The reason Caracalla is older in his statues and a kid in the movie is because the movie takes place in 211 AD when they co-ruled as teenagers. Geta was killed by Caracalla shortly after which is why his statue is a kid.
 
Last edited:

TheBeagle

JunkiesNetwork Donor
8,788
30,562
I don't think the Lucius in the movie was supposed to represent Lucius Veres who was groomed along with Marcus Aurelius to become emperor by Antonius. There were like a dozen total Roman first names to choose from in those days and it can get pretty confusing.

Caracalla was a fucking blood thirsty monster and would make a pretty good villain.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Burns

Avatar of War Slayer
7,491
14,732
Haven't seen the first in like a decade+, but it was a formative movie for me as a kid. I've got two dumb questions:

-Was Maximus always Lucius' father? The materials for this new movie say so, but I don't remember that being the case in the first movie. Thought it was more ambiguous than anything else (maybe even Commodus given how incestuous he felt towards his sister). This would mean Maximus cheated on his wife with Lucilla, which is hard to believe.

-Are these movies really historically accurate at all? I know they're based on real people/events, but then you have them going way off the reservation with things like Commodus being slain by Maximus in an arena when he was actually strangled in a bathtub.

View attachment 559183
Also, Lucius apparently came before Commodus in real life and was older than Commodus, which is a pretty goddamn big departure the first movie did from history.

View attachment 559184
The bad guys of the new movie followed two decades after Commodus (incidentally about as much time as has passed since the first movie) and granted citizenship to all the migrants in Rome lol. Looks like the new movie might be more accurate to history than the first, but the presence of Lucius in this era is still pretty weird. Unless there were two Luciuses.

Edit: The reason Caracalla is older in his statues and a kid in the movie is because the movie takes place in 211 AD when they co-ruled as teenagers. Geta was killed by Caracalla shortly after which is why his statue is a kid.
Dude (director) made it clear with the statement on Napoleon, that he doesn't give a fuck about history. Don't take anything in this movie, or the previous one, as anything but a fictional story that uses the same names.

This guy does a pretty good job of going over the historical accuracy of movies and some TV shows. I watched this years ago, but don't remember enough to give cliff notes:


That said, I liked Gladiator for what it was, a historical fiction. Not something I would or have watched a bunch, but it was good enough to watch more than once.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users

Rajaah

Honorable Member
<Gold Donor>
12,604
16,691
I don't think the Lucius in the movie was supposed to represent Lucius Veres who was groomed along with Marcus Aurelius to become emperor by Antonius. There were like a dozen total Roman first names to choose from in those days and it can get pretty confusing.

Caracalla was a fucking blood thirsty monster and would make a pretty good villain.

Don't think I heard much about Caracalla before this and I read quite a bit about the Roman Empire in the past. I think when it comes to "bad" leaders, Caligula and Nero pretty much soak up all of the attention.

From what I've seen of this movie I suspect Caracalla might be the best thing about it, actually. Like the bloodthirstyness of Commodus turned up to 11 plus a dash of insane.

And yeah, Maximus' son Lucius is probably supposed to be a completely different person from Lucius Veres who was co-Emperor with Marcus Aurelius. I could see that confusing a lot of folks who aren't well-versed on any of this and look into it.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
46,526
99,025
Caracalla was pretty bad. Blood thirsty and was a major reason Rome descended into chaos during the third century.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Pharazon2

Trakanon Raider
680
1,082
The kid in the first movie specifically told Maximus that Lucius Veres was his father. His father briefly ruled with Marcus Aurelius before dying, historical. The kid himself is not a historical figure that ever ruled. Entirely feasible that Maximus could have really been his father (in the movie) since he obviously had a thing with Lucilla long past.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Xarpolis

Life's a Dream
14,716
16,432
d
I have no faith in the movie, but the popcorn bucket is pretty sweet.

This steelbook of the original movie is pretty badass also, but no way in hell would I drop $150 on it. Maybe $50 total, but even that's iffy.

 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
46,526
99,025
Denzel after being tricked into kissing a dude and finding out its not even going to be in the movie;

 
  • 3Worf
Reactions: 2 users

TheBeagle

JunkiesNetwork Donor
8,788
30,562
Don't think I heard much about Caracalla before this and I read quite a bit about the Roman Empire in the past. I think when it comes to "bad" leaders, Caligula and Nero pretty much soak up all of the attention.

From what I've seen of this movie I suspect Caracalla might be the best thing about it, actually. Like the bloodthirstyness of Commodus turned up to 11 plus a dash of insane.

And yeah, Maximus' son Lucius is probably supposed to be a completely different person from Lucius Veres who was co-Emperor with Marcus Aurelius. I could see that confusing a lot of folks who aren't well-versed on any of this and look into it.
Nero wasn't even really that bad when it came to actually managing the empire. He kept in place a lot of the good stuff Claudius did and the Empire was in good shape for Vespacian once the dust settled at the end of the Year of the Four Emperors. But he was quite literally insane and enjoyed watching people tortured in the most horrific ways imaginable.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Cleveland

<Silver Donator>
1,086
3,585
That said, I liked Gladiator for what it was, a historical fiction. Not something I would or have watched a bunch, but it was good enough to watch more than once.
I think twice was my limit, I never understood the mass appeal on that one
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user