I have no faith in the movie, but the popcorn bucket is pretty sweet.
No imagination.I guess but I am not seeing any clear path for use as a sex tool.....
Dude (director) made it clear with the statement on Napoleon, that he doesn't give a fuck about history. Don't take anything in this movie, or the previous one, as anything but a fictional story that uses the same names.Haven't seen the first in like a decade+, but it was a formative movie for me as a kid. I've got two dumb questions:
-Was Maximus always Lucius' father? The materials for this new movie say so, but I don't remember that being the case in the first movie. Thought it was more ambiguous than anything else (maybe even Commodus given how incestuous he felt towards his sister). This would mean Maximus cheated on his wife with Lucilla, which is hard to believe.
-Are these movies really historically accurate at all? I know they're based on real people/events, but then you have them going way off the reservation with things like Commodus being slain by Maximus in an arena when he was actually strangled in a bathtub.
View attachment 559183
Also, Lucius apparently came before Commodus in real life and was older than Commodus, which is a pretty goddamn big departure the first movie did from history.
View attachment 559184
The bad guys of the new movie followed two decades after Commodus (incidentally about as much time as has passed since the first movie) and granted citizenship to all the migrants in Rome lol. Looks like the new movie might be more accurate to history than the first, but the presence of Lucius in this era is still pretty weird. Unless there were two Luciuses.
Edit: The reason Caracalla is older in his statues and a kid in the movie is because the movie takes place in 211 AD when they co-ruled as teenagers. Geta was killed by Caracalla shortly after which is why his statue is a kid.
I don't think the Lucius in the movie was supposed to represent Lucius Veres who was groomed along with Marcus Aurelius to become emperor by Antonius. There were like a dozen total Roman first names to choose from in those days and it can get pretty confusing.
Caracalla was a fucking blood thirsty monster and would make a pretty good villain.
I have no faith in the movie, but the popcorn bucket is pretty sweet.
Nero wasn't even really that bad when it came to actually managing the empire. He kept in place a lot of the good stuff Claudius did and the Empire was in good shape for Vespacian once the dust settled at the end of the Year of the Four Emperors. But he was quite literally insane and enjoyed watching people tortured in the most horrific ways imaginable.Don't think I heard much about Caracalla before this and I read quite a bit about the Roman Empire in the past. I think when it comes to "bad" leaders, Caligula and Nero pretty much soak up all of the attention.
From what I've seen of this movie I suspect Caracalla might be the best thing about it, actually. Like the bloodthirstyness of Commodus turned up to 11 plus a dash of insane.
And yeah, Maximus' son Lucius is probably supposed to be a completely different person from Lucius Veres who was co-Emperor with Marcus Aurelius. I could see that confusing a lot of folks who aren't well-versed on any of this and look into it.
I think twice was my limit, I never understood the mass appeal on that oneThat said, I liked Gladiator for what it was, a historical fiction. Not something I would or have watched a bunch, but it was good enough to watch more than once.