Oh stop being rational and reasonable.Mother's mercy is only mentioned in the books as shorthand for forgiveness. It isn't some type of punishment or torture.
I think people don't like Sansa, they like the Starks and are tired of the Starks being fucked over. People also want to see retribution happen and hope that Sansa will deliver it.also minor nitpick, when the fuck did Sansa become this "fan favorite?" that she has magically started being described as in the all the radfem media articles since that scene 2 episodes ago? She's been pretty much universally hated by the majority of book readers and tv viewers regardless of beliefs or political affiliations. Hell even a year or so ago there was this 1 meager little feminist voice came out to defend sansa and the show, that it was acceptable for a show with such a wide range of female characters to have at least 1 "damsel in distress" stereotypical feminine presence, and she was basically devoured by the radfem fandom and called a "literal nazi" for defending sansa. They, along with everyone else, hated sansa until 2 weeks ago when it was convenient to not hate her.
Oh the ironing...I'll never understand the people who are sad there's no lady stoneheart.
...
edit: Tocu knows what is up. Nobody cares about Sansa, they just want the Starks to stop getting shat upon. Which when Jon gets shanked (Not even sure that's an if for the show) will just be amplified.
Yeah that's officially my new favorite tinfoil theory.I just got a vengeance boner.
As opposed to Sansa and the trail of lord's corpses she's left in her wake as she wreaks terrible Stark vengeance on her enemies?Honestly, even reading the books I didn't think LSH was going to do anything major or stop the Starks from getting crapped on. Her parts were so minor that they barely registered
Not fish people??Yeah that's officially my new favorite tinfoil theory.
And I would totally agree. The issue being that there's no reason to implement a character that has such little impact (and has such little presence thus far in the books) vs. simply having an existing character get said absolutely minor vengeance. There's just no reason to include LSH in the show's narrative for two points of half-assed vengeance. Anything she could have done/would have done is easily added to other characters, and actually makes a bunch more sense within the show's story framework. Also, I don't buy into the Darth Sansa angle very much, as from reading the books she is still just a window onto greater things happening. Show Sansa has shown a tiny bit more backbone, but again she's just "there" at Winterfell while Theon does his gig and Stannis comes to town.As opposed to Sansa and the trail of lord's corpses she's left in her wake as she wreaks terrible Stark vengeance on her enemies?
My point isn't that I thought LSH was going to kill all the Lannisters, Freys, and Boltons. It's that some people thought she just might get some Stark vengeance, the same reason you two give for people being in Sansa's corner applies right to her.