- 6,338
- 7,144
^ Pretty good information. Makes it so much more clear that any serious gun restricting laws are simply unconstitutional.
Gun control
- Thread starter Saladus
- Start date
-
Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!
Go here and give us your nominations!Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Gavinmad
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 43,737
- 52,284
Nobody in the history of the internet has ever said that in response to a Fanaskin post. Forums were better off without you around.
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 55,942
- 138,354
I say things that aren't 'politically correct' because I recognize that as social control and engineering.
You for example either consciously or (probably)subconsciously aggrandise pedophilia.
- 6,338
- 7,144
God forbid someone actually reply to your informative post and interpret the court results which seem to set a precedent that police are in fact not responsible for the safety of an individual, which greatly necessitates the need for individual access to firearms. No, instead they will reply and call you an idiot and try to quarantine your information, so that they can ignore you and keep on repeating their same incorrect information. Regarding that gun bill Connecticut was trying to pass, that's absolutely insane.
So the depths of your fear extend to your wallet? You are truly a crusader for all that is right and just in this world. Keep fighting the good fight.
Gavinmad
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 43,737
- 52,284
If you were actually familiar with his post history, you'd be aware that fanaskin has not ever made an informative post at any point, ever. But yeah, I'm glad the forum move brought you back, I forgot what it's like to have a complete shit poster like you around. I mean at least people like fanaskin and b_mizzle can be entertaining from time to time, but you? You're just pathetic. Thanks for the butthurt neg too bro, I collect them!
- 6,338
- 7,144
General Antony
Ahn'Qiraj Raider
- 1,147
- 4,802
General Antony
Ahn'Qiraj Raider
- 1,147
- 4,802
Gavinmad
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 43,737
- 52,284
Yeah, can't say I'm surprised to get a 'no u' response from a quality poster like you.
- 6,338
- 7,144
I looked through some of your posts here to remind myself who you are. You are pretty butthurt and angry at a lot of people. Most of your posts involve calling someone a "butthurt fag" and insulting them. I'm guessing you aren't terribly happy about who or what you are in real life, and take it out on the internet. I don't know how good of a plan that is for coping with real life stressors. Or maybe you are just incredibly intolerant of people who have completely different views on life than you do. Whatever it is, I sure hope you can get over it. I don't know you or have any ill will towards you. I'm sure your reply to this will be something about calling me an idiot and implying in some way that I enjoy the sexual company of males.
---
BTW, school Obama's daughter goes to has 11 armed guards.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...Secret-Service
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 55,942
- 138,354
All I did was provide one example, which the fear would be at gun point escorted into a prison (not economic). At which point you retreated and narrowed your arguments scope, retreat is also the first sign of a losing.
here is another government agency that is obviously crooked corrupt and causing real damage and death to americans. The FDA, the FDA if you research it's history especially the history of who is in charge of fda decisions, and where those people wound up working (heres a hint most of them make rulings to help a giant corporation, then they move on to work for the corporation they just ruled in favor of)
How did aspartame get approved in the first place then?
Aspartame was approved for use as an additive in the US in 1981, even after the FDA refused to approve it for over eight years because it produced seizures and brain tumours in lab animals.Donald Rumsfeld was at the time CEO of Searle, the manufacturer, and used political chicanery rather than science to get the toxin on the market. This happened after Ronald Reagan came to power and a new FDA commissioner, Arthur Hull Hayes, was appointed. Arthur Hayes later became a consultant for Searle and Monsanto, receiving a huge salary.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robbie..._b_805581.html
http://www.stevia.net/aspartame.htm
http://www.notadoc.org/node/111
1997 Dr. Russell Blaylock, M.D. released his book, 'EXCITOTOXINS: The Taste That Kills'. This book I have highly recommended since first learning of it in 1998. Dr. Blaylock ties with intricate detail the explosion of Alzheimer's to the entrance of aspartame
http://www.truthinlabeling.org/Aspar...w.Blaylock.pdf
Aspertame is known to cause of cancer, the FDA constantly rules against using stevia a known safe natural sweetner and labels it a general hazard, meanwhile the entire nation of japan consumes the stuff and has been for 30 years with no known side effects of usage. It's blatantly obvious the FDA is protecting its aspartame producing friends at the expense of a safe alternative for a known carcinogen.
http://www.stevia.net/fda.htm
here are some other additives
http://healthfreedoms.org/2011/12/16...make-you-sick/
and for those saying well now we have truvia, truvia is a chemically altered shadow that is also known to have side effects.
I'm not the only one who thinks this way:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/151490/fe...ord-level.aspx
March 2009. The 64% of Americans who say big government will be the biggest threat to the country
I do not know if this will help. But, actually, you write things that are strange, often illogical, and difficult to understand. Your interpretation of what it is you are writing( and therefore trying to convey) is different than the interpretation by others(or at least by myself) of what you have written. This makes it difficult to accept the substance of what you post.
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 55,942
- 138,354
Strange and difficult I accept without question, but illogical? what most people pass around as 'logic' is infact faith, they prescribe a faith in a source and repeat it without challenging it.
Like for example, if you have faith in the FDA you would use the FDA or FDA backed institutions one will often propagate their answers on what to eat /drink what is and isnt healthy. You as an individual most of the time however exercise no logic and no reasoning whatsoever, You couldn't without a long comprehensive (untainted) study of the information in perspective. It is infact a form of faith to just repeat what is told to you, and to abide by their guidelines.
The same can be applied to People(gun) Control, many views are propagated based on the faith those people have in their source.
What I found is When you question and ultimately test the logic behind what these large institutions tell you, you will however find that their logic fails a lot. That's why I belive my views are often rejected out of hand by slander and libel, Alot of the implications would shake peoples faith in places it had been placed.
You did it again. In trying to explain why your posts are strange, illogical, and difficult to understand, you posted material that was strange, illogical, and difficult to understand.
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 55,942
- 138,354
You can't talk about specific topics in a vacumn because 99% of human reality is influenced and interconnected by external influences.
as such the scientific method of cause and effect is inferior to systems analysis.
Peoples perceptions of reality shape their behavoir greatly.
I look at how events shape peoples perceptions of reality and try to show that common perceptions are often based on false premises.
using two previous arguments I tried to levy:
People have a perception that police are there to protect them, they aren't. That greatly alters the talk about people(gun) control.
People have a perception the FDA is always looking out for the health of the country, they aren't, that greatly alters talk about healthcare(among other things).
Excidium
Trakanon Raider
- 849
- 1,319
They passed Aspertame to try and curb the obesity epidemic the US was starting to experience. Sadly the quick fix approach failed, like it always does. Artificial sweetners don' add to calorie count, but they are still linked to obesity and diabetes.
http://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/a...t-201207165030