Canada has a far larger proportion of foreign born citizens (20% vs 10%)
20% of all immigration happens to the U.S., 3% goes to Canada. We would probably accept a higher % of total population too, if 1.) Our native foreign born population didn't already eclipse your entire countries population. 2.) We could pick and choose only high productivity, low social cost workers--you know, because you *DON'T* have a land border with an impoverished third world nation that floods nearly 55% of your foreign born population.
Tell you what, you take half our poor, starving, uneducated foreign born Latinos and we'll gladly accept all of your scientists and engineers. Okay? I don't think you Canadians will jump at that, considering 60% of your foreign influx comes from Asian countries, 20% from European and you only let about 10% of those poor Latino's in. The U.S., on the other hand, has 55% of it's foreign citizens from Latin countries, 10% from Europe and 27% from Asia. (Sources for the numbers
Canadaand
U.S.)
There is *no* comparison between the origination of our Foreign born--you guys get as much discretion as we get from Asia/Europe. Something like 80% of your citizens come speaking English--you know why? Because they were well educated before you let them in. Immigration "problems" does not mean total immigration. It means *problems* with immigration.
a higher immigration rate
In terms of legal immigration? I have serious doubts if we include illegal...but I don't know the numbers off hand, so I can't be sure.
more urbanized population.
No, you don't. The U.S. is more urbanized. 79.5 vs 82.5
You're wrong on pretty much every count
Not really. The U.S. is far more diverse, we have far greater immigration problems (Problems being the key word) and we have more urban centers. Those are all true statements. Like I said, if you want to swap your entire population of legal scientists, engineers, and other educated workers--for our legion of illegal, uneducated, impoverished masses...I'm sure we will swap very quickly.
But quantifying "immigration problems" as "total immigration" like you did in your post is just silly. Immigration is a GREAT thing when you can control it. I'm all for the U.S. plucking the best and brightest from the rest of the world--that's awesome. It doesn't work so well though when you share a land border with a near failed state.
But this question has been asked before....
Why can Canada be the eternal good guy on immigration.And much like world politics, trade and a slew of other issues--Canada can look good, because it sits back and lets the U.S. handle the bad.