Please provide peer-reviewed data published in a respectable journal backing up your data that Tuco stated "citation needed" for. You racist. And how dare you make fun of mentally handicapped kids, you meanie?
Here's how we got here:
I didn't think you'd be able to back this up. I'd recommend you stay away from facts and stick to insults and unprovable ideas.
No I'm not going to bother providing data to prove that North Dakota is more racist than New York. If you people are so fucking disconnected from reality that you need me to explain that the sky is blue, there's no point talking to you.
You must have a serious chip on your shoulder about something to think that is at all what I was trying to say.
1. It's not even really relevant to what I was saying (hence the "moreover").
That might not have been what youmeantto say but that was the direct implication of what you did say.
I can't believe what a horrible person you are. You're taking the word "retard" which is used to describe a person with a slowed mental development and using it as an insult. That is just as bad, if not worse, than any one person being a racist. You are a complete hypocrite. I can't believe the discrimination in this thread from people like you.
Actually, the problem with our homicide rate, is in fact directly attributable to the "brown" people. The "brown" people, which make up around 90 million of our overall population have a higher propensity to commit homicide with a firearm than the "white" people.
A suitcase nuke is a bomb. Bombs are not arms. Arms are hand held weaponry equivalent to a pistol or a rifle, or upgraded versions of same. The framers explicitly protected the bearing of arms. For example, while a sub-machine gun is an arm(as it is a direct derivative of pistol/rifle) a rocket-propelled grenade launcher is not, in the framers' definition, since this is just a scaled down version of a cannon.
I can't even begin to follow whatever insane logic you used to call that a correlation = causation. My argument was just that it's insane to claim that racially diverse populations aremoreracist than racially homogeneous populations and that that is clearly borne out by even a passing association with the real world. Whether or not that's true iswhollyirrelevant to whether or not the problem of racism lies with the racists or whether it lies with the people they hate (i.e. that the problem is "diversity").
Ok, just keep making baseless claims and making fun of mentally handicapped kids.
It's not a metaphorical argument. What you are saying is stupid on its face. You seriously want me to believe North Dakota is less racist than New York? Fine. Go ahead and say that stupid shit. That is the point where I feel sufficiently superior to not give a fuck about this conversation, because you have driven it off the tard cliff.
See above where Tuco was talking about the correlation/causation problem. The reason that you're making that error is that you have a confirmation bias toward the racist conclusions you already hold.
People that are actually mentally retarded have an excuse. What's yours?