Wait until you hear about this movie from the 70s called Star Wars..Crazy how popular this still is. 26 years after the first book was published and people still love it. I hadn't been to a Barnes & Noble and I was floored when I saw how much Harry Potter merchandise they have. JK gets a cut of every single thing sold. I don't know what her cut of Hogwarts Legacy is, but it has to be massive. And you know they are working on a sequel, so she's going to make mad cash on that, too.
Yep they should be filming all 4 of those seasons at once and then releasing them 9 months apart from each other.Key is to churn out years 1-4 fast. 5-7 can slow. Easy to pass a 19 year old as 16-17.
With woke hollywood, there's a 50% chance Harry will transition.
Yes that 100% seems like something the loudly anti-trans Rowling would do. You guys don't sound retarded at all.I'm betting on Neville being trans.
Starts out as a male, insecure and clumsy like in the movies, transitions into female and becomes confident and badass by the end.
Perfect arc for wokeism, weak when misgender, powerful when properly gendered.
Crazy how popular this still is. 26 years after the first book was published and people still love it. I hadn't been to a Barnes & Noble and I was floored when I saw how much Harry Potter merchandise they have. JK gets a cut of every single thing sold. I don't know what her cut of Hogwarts Legacy is, but it has to be massive. And you know they are working on a sequel, so she's going to make mad cash on that, too.
Is she in control?Yes that 100% seems like something the loudly anti-trans Rowling would do. You guys don't sound retarded at all.
She's an executive producer and has already dedicated a sizable chunk of her fortune to philanthropic works, including a female-only support group for sexual assault survivors that is run entirely out of her pocket because it's not registered as a charity in Scotland. I don't know if she has as much control over the show as she did over the movies, but she wouldn't sell out and let them shit on her legacy.Is she in control?
Hmm... the new WB executive appears to be anti-woke too, or at least cancelling unprofitable woke projects like Batwomen.She's an executive producer and has already dedicated a sizable chunk of her fortune to philanthropic works, including a female-only support group for sexual assault survivors that is run entirely out of her pocket because it's not registered as a charity in Scotland. I don't know if she has as much control over the show as she did over the movies, but she wouldn't sell out and let them shit on her legacy.
Keep in mind her desire to protect real women from dickchoppers doesn't make her some kind of arch-conservative or something, I wouldn't be at all shocked to find her being completely on board with blackwashing the Weasley family as long as they were all portrayed by UK blacks.
He's a Hollywood early lifer who cancelled two other Scooby Doo projects but thought nothing was wrong with Velma.Hmm... the new WB executive appears to be anti-woke too, or at least cancelling unprofitable woke projects like Batwomen.
She's an executive producer and has already dedicated a sizable chunk of her fortune to philanthropic works, including a female-only support group for sexual assault survivors that is run entirely out of her pocket because it's not registered as a charity in Scotland.
The only casting rumor I’ve read that will rustle your jimmies is Blair Underwood as Dumbledore.
Driver looks the part, but does he have Alan Rickman's hateful charisma? Driver is more of a brat, at least thats howhe was in the Disney Star Wars films.Tom Felton coming back as Lucius Malfoy is cool anyway. Adam Driver as Snape is great but I'm skeptical he will sign the commitment.
Driver can pull it off. He's got pretty good acting chops.Driver looks the part, but does he have Alan Rickman's hateful charisma? Driver is more of a brat, at least thats howhe was in the Disney Star Wars films.