That clinic was not shut down because it couldn't get admitting privileges at a hospital it was closed because it existing facility didn't meet new safety codes. They are also in process of building a new facility that meets the new code.
Again i want a example of a abortion clinic shut because it could not get emergency admitting to a local hospital in order to comply with the new safety regulations.
Granting emergency admissions is not the same as admitting privileges:
The "safety" codes wrapped in the law that brought in the admitting privliges. The architecture changes were also a stall. The entire set of laws were put into place to put these people out of busines. Its similar to writing laws to put title loans shops out of business. Stop being dense.
Exactly. It isn't a safety regulation because the only time a patient at an abortion clinic is going to have to go to a hospital is in an emergency. In that case the hospital can not refuse care. They are trying to require every abortion clinic to have doctors on staff at a close hospital. This is nonsense.
So was it case of being turned down because they don't like abortion are a case of clinic staff not meeting requirements to be given admitting privileges. That if we have a actual case where the clinics tried to getting admitting privledge and were turned down.
Thread is inherently about governmental power of regulation. Safety regulation on abortion clinic arn't about abortion ether there about safety and governmental power to impose them.
There's a difference between not going out of your way to mention that gay is involved somewhere in the transaction, which might be reasonable, and having to curtail your options to hide the fact. Forinstance going to buy a birthday cake for your straight friend Carol and telling the baker "Btw, I'm gay!" is entirely unnecessay and expecting you to just stfu about it isnt wildly unreasonable; its irrelevant to buying a cake for Carol. But if you instead want to buy a wedding cake for your gay friends then its a bit tricky to avoid telling the baker "I need a pair of those little groom figures for the top and could you write "Congratulations Garry and Steve" on the icing please?" and still get the cake you want, and its not reasonable to have to curtail your options or risk not getting a cake at all.
And in ZERO of those other instances were the regulations passed with the specific intention of shuttering businesses due to non-meetable guidelines.
Do you know the history of abortion clinics? Where women could actually go into a clinic without fear? Then bombs came. Then government started forcing the clinic to get special privileges. Then you have the government forcing the woman to listen the fetal heart rate as well as visualize it on an ultrasound. You also have some states trying to make abortion illegal (I'm sure there are some already), regardless if she had been raped by a stranger or a family member. Then you have stupid government officials actually saying that women have the innate ability of stopping a pregnancy by the very thought.
Dude stop quoting me if you're just going to ignore what I said right above the part you quoted.
How is any of the above relevant to government imposing safety regulation upon abortion clinics?
I don't hate gay people I hate the government.