- 22,456
- 29,605
You don't like the quantum choice experiments either? We could be friends.Maybe you should just drop the metaphor bs, because you either have no idea what entanglement is or you don't understand what "choice" means.
You don't like the quantum choice experiments either? We could be friends.Maybe you should just drop the metaphor bs, because you either have no idea what entanglement is or you don't understand what "choice" means.
The difference between an event and a choice is that a mind initiates a choice. So a wave form collapsing on its own is an event. one collapsing at the power of a human is a choice, thus why it is intentionally called a choice experiment.You are conflating an event with a choice. The two are not the same thing. This whole conversation is so far from reality at this point I don't even know what to do.
Stop giving this thread AIDS. Thanks.The difference between an event and a choice is that a mind initiates a choice. So a wave form collapsing on its own is an event. one collapsing at the power of a human is a choice, thus why it is intentionally called a choice experiment.
What the fuck am I readingIts nice to know your disagreement with me is based upon not knowing the meaning of words.
Lets use quantum entanglement as an example, since everyone here loves it so much. It's called a quantum choice experiment, because a particle is given two or more options and must choose one. Is this a conscious choice?
But furry, you don't believe in QE. Correct, put two pieces of food an equal distance from an ant. Will the ant go for one of the two or ignore it. This again is a choice. Did the ant make a concious decision, or did it make an instinctual choice?
I can give numerous more examples, but its an exercise in futiliy if you don't understand it by now. Unconscious choices are still choices.There are numerous studies about how unconscious thought bias and desires sway human decisions. I am extremely for gay rights because I think people should have the free will to choose and decide how they wish. Being gay is something that can be affected by your life and situation. Being black is something cannot be affected by your life and situation. Comparing the two as equal is idiotic.
Lets use quantum entanglement as an example, since everyone here loves it so much. It's called a quantum choice experiment, because a particle is given two or more options and must choose one. Is this a conscious choice?
I'm open to offers.If i hire furry to post for araysar full time would that bypass the ban bet? I only have the best interest of the forum in mind.
Interesting question. This may be why hobby lobby only applies to 'closely held corporations' or whatever the exact question is.Is there some way to sue on behalf of a corporation against its owners because the owners forced the corporation (which is a person) to unconditionally accept a religion? The corporation didn't choose that religion, or is it a slave to its owners?
That's a really bad comparison, though. Araysar was as a good a troll as I've ever seen. Furry doesn't troll.If i hire furry to post for araysar full time would that bypass the ban bet? I only have the best interest of the forum in mind.
two gluesticks and a gold star a week.What do you make as a stay at home downie?
PEORIA, Ill. - Star Transport, Inc., a trucking company based in Morton, Ill., violated federal law by failing to accommodate two employees because of their religion, Islam, and discharging them, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed today.
The lawsuit alleged that Star Transport refused to provide two employees with an accommodation of their religious beliefs when it terminated their employment because they refused to deliver alcohol. According to EEOC District Director John P. Rowe, who supervised administrative investigation prior to filing the lawsuit, "Our investigation revealed that Star could have readily avoided assigning these employees to alcohol delivery without any undue hardship, but chose to force the issue despite the employees' Islamic religion."
I guess you missed that whole Hobby Lobby kerfuffle, as if we needed yet another front on which to consider a business/corporation a person. Especially the notion that a corporation "found religion".EEOC Sues Star Transport, Inc. for Religious Discrimination
This is 2 years old. I fail to see the differene, so a company has to provide you with alternative things to do if it conflicts with your religion, but a company can't do the same?