Gravel
Mr. Poopybutthole
Im sure this one is bullish...
I know this isn't politics, but what the fuck?
- 2
Im sure this one is bullish...
I cross-posted with more details in /polI know this isn't politics, but what the fuck?
Our posture has always been "we dont use nukes unless nukes have been used already". But lets carry it over to /polThe Pentagon doesn't rule out much, but the Pentagon generally doesn't make the call to use nukes.
When you pay for overpriced TWTR with more overpriced TSLA. 4-d chess.
Here are the official rules. https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nysearca/2020/34-88943-ex5.pdfBlazin Jysin I have an options question. When the bid/ask is 0.00 and 0.05 and you have to set your limit in 5 cent intervals, how do you set the orders? Market and try to get a split? Limit of 0.05 and see if a buyer comes up to 0.05? I see transactions of 2 and 3 cents so I assume those are market orders?
View attachment 440116
I have a chunk of SPIR, I might do 1 contract on market order just to see what happens (if anything).Here are the official rules. https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nysearca/2020/34-88943-ex5.pdf
I believe they can only quote at those intervals but that doesn't mean an exchange won't permit an execution outside of them. So I don't know if certain exchanges would permit this where others won't. I don't believe you'll ever get a fill not on the increments but I don't use market orders on options so I could be wrong on that.
I think this is the answer but I am not sure I read it correctly. I think it says it converts a market to limit with a limit of 0.05. That make sense but then why I am seeing orders filled at 2 and 3 cents?Here are the official rules. https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nysearca/2020/34-88943-ex5.pdf
I believe they can only quote at those intervals but that doesn't mean an exchange won't permit an execution outside of them. So I don't know if certain exchanges would permit this where others won't. I don't believe you'll ever get a fill not on the increments but I don't use market orders on options so I could be wrong on that.
It could just come down to the market maker seeing your trade and being willing to take the fill in between.I have a chunk of SPIR, I might do 1 contract on market order just to see what happens (if anything).
What I took out of the article (and I am skilled at reading ZH-ese) is that they had units of CS that fell below liquidity regulations and the bank and the NYT were trying to brush it aside. I understand the bank doing it as they should be going to jail for the shit they pulled so they dont have a lot to lose lying about it. But, as in politics, we have what should be legitimate news orgs not actually doing news but being cheerleaders.It could just come down to the market maker seeing your trade and being willing to take the fill in between.
The credit suisse stories are straight up criminal behavior. That was an orchestrated event by short sellers, and that idiot article you just linked saying, we caused a bank run therefor we were right, seem to be putting the cart before the horse. Zero Hedge is probably involved in the scam. Bank system is critical enough they really need to dig into it deep and start slapping some cuffs on people. None of that is to say that Credit Suisse is in good shape, in fact quite the opposite but that is why it was used as the target. A vulnerable financial company is ripe for manipulation to try to get it to topple.
These are the exact same people who pushed the MASSIVE CHINA DEFAULT bullshit previously that everyone is just quiet on now. Shouldn't we all be dead by now? You like to get my goat but I hate seeing that kind of bullshit posted here. /rant