If she's only used for singing parts and the rest is Joker might not be too bad.Lady Gaga as HQ? What are they thinking? She's physically difficult to look at on top of not being an actress. This is going to be complete trash.
Singing? Wouldn't that make this movie a musical?If she's only used for singing parts and the rest is Joker might not be too bad.
Singing? Wouldn't that make this movie a musical?
If you think he's that bad, report him. But the standard he's going to be judged against in this case is Ossoi. A person who has admitted to purposely making the movie house unreadable for people since he got out of the shaw last time, constantly posts his unfunny and annoying catchphrase of "I am not autistic", and just now tried to derail this thread once again after I had successfully gotten it back on topic.
Is that really a hill you want to try to take?
You hear that Chuk? Someone thinks you are worse than Ossoi at well... anything.
This could and probably should be the catalyst for you to really take a hard look at yourself and the life choices that have lead to this moment.
he always backs up Mr Autism2024's posts, so not surprised that he thinks i'm worse than him. ive been posting my thoughts here for 24 years. whatever life choices i made, happened long ago. its alright, let them circlejerk over the innocuous posts i make. the part where they cross the line into creepy homo territory is when they follow me to every thread i post and just copy paste all my posts into their stalker thread. thats a bit much. i had to make my profile private just to slow them down.You hear that Chuk? Someone thinks you are worse than Ossoi at well... anything.
This could and probably should be the catalyst for you to really take a hard look at yourself and the life choices that have lead to this moment.
Nobody follows you. We can't control that your verbal diarrhea is expelled into a countless number of media threads, even shit you don't watch and don't plan to watch.he always backs up Mr Autism2024's posts, so not surprised that he thinks i'm worse than him. ive been posting my thoughts here for 24 years. whatever life choices i made, happened long ago. its alright, let them circlejerk over the innocuous posts i make. the part where they cross the line into creepy homo territory is when they follow me to every thread i post and just copy paste all my posts into their stalker thread. thats a bit much. i had to make my profile private just to slow them down.
Or his "opinion" on words that have had unambiguous definitions for more than a century with hundreds of stage and theater productions as examples.Nobody follows you. We can't control that your verbal diarrhea is expelled into a countless number of media threads, even shit you don't watch and don't plan to watch.
Chuk is a great poster.Nobody follows you. We can't control that your verbal diarrhea is expelled into a countless number of media threads, even shit you don't watch and don't plan to watch.
No one's reporting him so no one's trying to really get rid of him. It doesn't mean he can't get shit on everywhere he goes. It also doesn't mean that he isn't a massive derailing shit poster.Chuk is a great poster.
Guys maybe stop getting triggered by all the mildly interesting posters and trying to get rid of them because your fee fees are hurt? Otherwise the place will be boring.
He's great at arguing with objective reality. He's literally over here arguing that any movie featuring songs is a musical. So like every fucking film ever produced is a musical because they all have soundtracks featuring songs.Chuk is a great poster.
Guys maybe stop getting triggered by all the mildly interesting posters and trying to get rid of them because your fee fees are hurt? Otherwise the place will be boring.
Brown sauce causes autism, apparently.He's great at arguing with objective reality. He's literally over here arguing that any movie featuring songs is a musical. So like every fucking film ever produced is a musical because they all have soundtracks featuring songs.
In Chuk's opinion, here are the 18 films that are not considered musicals because they don't have a soundtrack
Oh Wait it's Chris, the king of refusing to admit when he's wrong. I see why you come to the defense of your fellow retard
i never said any movie with songs in it as in a soundtrack means its a musical. why would i make such a ridiculous claim? i said any movie where characters in the movie perform multiple songs. not one or two, but at least three and take up a sizable amount of screen time, means it counts as a musical IMO. somebody said moneyball counts as a musical because the stupid daughter performs that horrible song. its just one song and it was totally random. thats not a musical. the fact that people still cant grasp what i'm saying means i'm wasting my time trying to explain this, but i'm bored so here i am.He's great at arguing with objective reality. He's literally over here arguing that any movie featuring songs is a musical. So like every fucking film ever produced is a musical because they all have soundtracks featuring songs.
In Chuk's opinion, here are the 18 films that are not considered musicals because they don't have a soundtrack
Oh Wait it's Chris, the king of refusing to admit when he's wrong. I see why you come to the defense of your fellow retard
i wasnt attacking established norms of a musical. please read my posts instead of what others are saying my post was. i said any movie with multiple musical performances by characters can also be considered a musical. if Joe Schmoe performs 5 songs in a movie with his band/solo throughout the film. thats a musical because you are sitting through a character's performance. i was very specific that these have to be characters in the movie. a movie like Walk The Line is a biography, but its also a musical. it can be both.Or his "opinion" on words that have had unambiguous definitions for more than a century with hundreds of stage and theater productions as examples.
hey thanks, yeah lots of people have been run off this site in the same way. i always try to encourage debate, but people see this as an opportunity to shit on the person and run them off the site. its pretty sad, sadder is that the people who need to get run off this site never get gone. somebody gets banned for 6 months, end up returning a week later mysteriously.Chuk is a great poster.
Guys maybe stop getting triggered by all the mildly interesting posters and trying to get rid of them because your fee fees are hurt? Otherwise the place will be boring.
Your opinion is still wrong. To be a musical the songs have to be part of the dialogue and exposition.i wasnt attacking established norms of a musical. please read my posts instead of what others are saying my post was. i said any movie with multiple musical performances by characters can also be considered a musical. if Joe Schmoe performs 5 songs in a movie with his band/solo throughout the film. thats a musical because you are sitting through a character's performance. i was very specific that these have to be characters in the movie. a movie like Walk The Line is a biography, but its also a musical. it can be both.
thats more of a loophole, the songs were affected by whats going on in the movie. you wouldnt have some of those songs without the events unfolding. i say if it has a bunch of songs by the characters in it and the songs happened naturally through the plot, then it counts as a musical.Your opinion is still wrong. To be a musical the songs have to be part of the dialogue and exposition.
The Music Man is a musical. Walk the Line is not.
This isn't a debate. The musical genre is well defined, and has been for well over a century. A movie about musicians is not a musical unless the songs are part of the dialogue and exposition.thats more of a loophole, the songs were affected by whats going on in the movie. you wouldnt have some of those songs without the events unfolding. i say if it has a bunch of songs by the characters in it and the songs happened naturally through the plot, then it counts as a musical.