League Of Legends

Sidian

Sidian

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,279
7
It's not even about the sustain though, it's all about it being the highest AD item in the game. Your Q scales with (iirc) 120% bonus AD and if you use your E with your Q it gains an extra 40%.

Don't get me wrong though, Jayce is still strong if you build him tanky/bruiser so he can dive in with his Melee Form, but if you're main goal is to siege from a distance with QE, stacking BTs is the way to do it.

edit:


Physical Damage: 60 / 115 / 170 / 225 / 280 (+ 120% Bonus AD)

If Shock Blast is fired through an Acceleration Gate the area of effect, missile speed, range and damage will increase by 40%.

Accelerated Physical Damage: 84 / 161 / 238 / 315 / 392 (+ 168% Bonus AD)

Yeah, you want BTs. :p
 
C

Commander Vimeseh_sl

shitlord
2,122
3
Okey dokey, I'll try it.

Adjusting to mid again since it seems the only way I'll be able to carry on a consistent basis is get that or jung. Just shoving my lane and roaming. I just have a liking for the more ad caster style mids with nid/kayle/Yi thrown in if I have to go ap that game.

So far Jayce and kha have been really strong for me. Thinking of putting in some time with J4 in mid as well.
 
T

Tortfeasor

Molten Core Raider
1,014
199
I've gone mid with Riven a couple of times and steamrolled but it might have just been that it "wasn't meta". If you go against an ap without armor runes a full lvl 3 combo will either make them leave lane or kill them.
 
Enob

Enob

Golden Knight of the Realm
413
112
This shit's getting ridiculous. Ever since the 3.0.3 Quinn patch the servers have been horrendous. Servers have been down for several hours almost every single night.
 
drtyrm

drtyrm

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,991
155
I was poking about on the website and got intrigued by the Tribunal. I've reviewed 68 cases over the past week while waiting in a queue. I thought I was being overly harsh on these dipshits because I haven't pardoned anyone. Turns out I was doing it correctly, 94.1% accuracy. LoL players are assholes.
smile.png


http://na.leagueoflegends.com/tribun...tice-review/3/
 
Ravishing

Ravishing

Uninspiring Title
<Bronze Donator>
8,456
3,577
Reviewed: 388
Justice Rating: 6414
82.7% Accuracy
Cases Correct: 321
Longest Streak: 27
Toxic Days Prevented: 951
Players Permabanned: 9

I don't always hit punish but I certainly do most of the time. In the last 25 cases I've reviewed, 1 person was pardoned, 14 got time bans, 10 got warnings.
I think the tribunal does a pretty good job. You have to expect that players making it into the tribunal are most likely going to be toxic. I have played several thousand LoL games and have never had any action against my account. More online games should implement a tribunal system, it isn't flawed at all imo.
 
T

The Ancient_sl

shitlord
7,386
16
The flaw is that you are rewarded only for cases you are correct in judgement and that you can anticipate that others will judge guilty without much consideration so you probably will do the same.
 
Ravishing

Ravishing

Uninspiring Title
<Bronze Donator>
8,456
3,577
There are no rewards for reviewing cases anymore (as far as im aware). You use to get IP per case but that was removed with the new system. The reward is simply the satisfaction of punishing toxic players. I don't even use it that often, just will log in some cases if I'm bored during work or on my second monitor when waiting for LoL to load etc.

Are you implying that a high Accuracy number is a reward? Doesn't really mean much. I vote punish the majority of the time and I'm only 82.7% accurate. I've missed more pardons than punishes.
 
W

WhatsAmmataU_sl

shitlord
1,022
0
I was given a warning through a tribunal case where one of the two or three games in the case contained a single report with the single word comment "cheating".

This bullshit report helped carry me to whatever threshold gets you into the tribunal to begin with. The flaw is that angry little kids give out reports like they are candy, and then people like you auto click guilty.
 
Ravishing

Ravishing

Uninspiring Title
<Bronze Donator>
8,456
3,577
There are certainly people auto-clicking guilty, but since there is no reward for doing the tribunal, it makes no sense to do so. I look through the cases and definitely pardon here & there. I would expect a case gets several hundreds if not thousands of votes. With such a large sample size I expect most outcomes to be fairly accurate.

Riot has alluded to systems in place that put lower weight on players that always push punish. I'm sure there are a slew of other measures in place too. Every case can be reviewed even after the case has been voted on, post your case # and we can check it out
biggrin.png
 
Nirgon

Nirgon

Log Wizard
15,040
24,744
Jesus Christ.... I've gone through some of these. Guy feeding to turret and buying all boots... hard to believe people really just log in to do this. They must have given up early on learning the game and feel they are some how getting even with the world by ruining everyone else's good time. Wish I could ban some of these fucks myself.
 
S

Slyminxy

Lord Nagafen Raider
798
-673
I played thousands of games on 4 different accounts, beed quite a dick in some of them and never got anything from the Tribunal.

However, I haven't left any games in my entire LoL Career on purpose. 3 disconnects during the night with no internet for half a day don't count as intentional. I've even adopted the thing where I don't click yes to surrender unless it's TOTALLY a lost game. Oh, I was a dick verbally or passive non-agression/putting people on ignore in my team. Refusing to help them on their asshat braindead "excursions into the unknown".
 
drtyrm

drtyrm

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,991
155
The draw of the process is seeing your "Toxic Days Prevented" pile up. Knowing you had a part in banning some miserable rager helps me control my own miserable raging in game.
 
drtyrm

drtyrm

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,991
155
WhatsAmmataU_sl said:
I was given a warning through a tribunal case where one of the two or three games in the case contained a single report with the single word comment "cheating".

This bullshit report helped carry me to whatever threshold gets you into the tribunal to begin with. The flaw is that angry little kids give out reports like they are candy, and then people like you auto click guilty.
Click to expand...
Unlike Blizzard's "customer service", Riot lets you share your case anywhere you want. If you want to show us how you got screwed.
 
W

WhatsAmmataU_sl

shitlord
1,022
0
So you're saying I'm lying? You said the system has no flaw. The flaw is some idiot (you) or collection of idiots (people like you) who vote punish 100% of the time.

You know, I apologize. There wasn't one report. There were 2. I would link the entire case, but it's so bad I'm sure that it wouldn't stand up against even your abnormally high burden of proof of nothing.

rrr_img_16711.jpg
 
drtyrm

drtyrm

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,991
155
WhatsAmmataU_sl said:
So you're saying I'm lying? You said the system has no flaw. The flaw is some idiot (you) or collection of idiots (people like you) who vote punish 100% of the time.

You know, I apologize. There wasn't one report. There were 2. I would link the entire case, but it's so bad I'm sure that it wouldn't stand up against even your abnormally high burden of proof of nothing.
Click to expand...
I never said you were lying. I never said the system has no flaws.

You could link it correctly so we could see the judgement and scroll through the chat. Like this:http://na.leagueoflegends.com/tribunal/en/case/6266773/
 
Ravishing

Ravishing

Uninspiring Title
<Bronze Donator>
8,456
3,577
If i saw that case based on the ss I'd click pardon simply because you were reported for "cheating". Seeing more of the chat would be helpful, though. Also, I typically pardon more often if players are reported by enemy rather than allies. I am ok with bantering with the enemy etc but causing team turmoil through raging is another story. You werent reported by an ally which leads me to believe the enemy were just butthurt kids
 
You must log in or register to reply here.