But that can't work, because the darkest part of the shadow of the moon on the earth would be at least as big as the moon: 2,159 miles wide.
Well, that's enough dumb for me today. Thanks.
- 1
But that can't work, because the darkest part of the shadow of the moon on the earth would be at least as big as the moon: 2,159 miles wide.
Ben Stein: What do you think is the possibility that Intelligent Design might turn out to be the answer to some issues in genetics or in Darwinian evolution?
Prof Dawkins: Well it could come about in the following way. It could be that, eh, at some earlier time somewhere in the universe a civilization evolved by probably some kind of Darwinian means to a very, very, high level of technology and designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet. Ehm, now, that is a possibility and an intriguing possibility and I suppose it’s possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the um detail, details, of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer.
Ben Stein: (voiceover, not part of interview) Wait a second, Richard Dawkins thought Intelligent Design might be a legitimate pursuit.
Prof Dawkins: Um..and that designer could well be a higher intelligence from elsewhere in the universe.
Ben Stein: But, but
Prof Dawkins: But that higher intelligence would itself have had to have come about by some explicable, or ultimately explicable process, he couldn’t have just jumped into existence spontaneously, that’s the point.
Ben Stein: voiceover) So Professor Dawkins was not against Intelligent Design, just certain types of Designers, such as God.
Speaking of bullshit from NASA. Gotta love the multiple sources of light on the moon.
God has a dark sense of humor.
Your imaginary sky wizard has whatever sense of humor you want it to have.
The oh-fuck-o-meter is going to shatter.
Your imaginary sky wizard has whatever sense of humor you want it to have.
Please elaborate on “physics experiments” proving god. I’ll take troll bait