Lumi's Batshit Insane Thread

Szeth said:

Please elaborate on “physics experiments” proving god. I’ll take troll bait

Click to expand...

Beware of unearned wisdom.

Before I red pill you, AKA trigger you out of your conditioning creating a painful existential crisis, I'm going to take a step back and explain where the fuck you are right now and why this isn't a troll.

This thread is a freak show or zoo for unacceptable ideas and data. The uninitiated come here to laugh at the freaks.

Who decides what ideas and data are acceptable?

In any given data set there are data points called "outliers". Most outliers are the result of bad data collection, a mistake in the experiment, etc. But, rarely, the outlier is a genuine point of data that cannot be explained by the current model of understanding.

Therefore, investigating outliers is a tedious exercise. Most of the "rabbit holes" I explore are complete bullshit. It's usually easy to see if something is bullshit in the first few hours of exploration.

But, if you keep going you start to find shit you cannot explain. These are the genuine outliers, the "tinfoil hat" conspiracies. It's pretty easy to identify them now-a-days. All you have to look for is the "dumbest" most "insane" conspiracies around and observe the behavior of the people claiming to be trolls.

But, I'm getting ahead of myself.

In Plato's Republic, he presents the allegory of the cave.



Do not continue this conversation, unless you are prepared to see the light of the sun outside the cave and be forced to live back inside the cave unable to discuss the truth with those around you. Do not continue unless you are willing to become Lumie, mocked, ridiculed, constantly questioning your own sanity.

What I'm offering is not a gift. It is a curse of madness, pain, and truth.

Why would anyone want to live like Lumie? It's not a choice for us. We're high in Openness, high in Agreeableness. Willing to be conned, to be tricked, to be fooled, and patiently question our ways out. Willing to be wrong. Unable to stop asking questions. Willing to believe that the people we think are retarded might know something we don't, might have something we can learn from them.

When I was a kid, I was brainwashed by the Mormon church to search for "Truth", and dumb enough to believe they meant... "truth" and not "the truth of the book of mormon and our religious dogma." There's an idea at the core of science that my teachers never taught, but I innately understood. Science, by definition, is wrong because it's incomplete. If we knew everything then we could sit back, relax, and stop doing science. But we don't know everything, therefore we have to question everything we think we know. Even the very foundations of our current understanding. Not once, but constantly, until we know everything.

This was my path to where I am. It wasn't fun, and I'm not here to troll.

Beware of unearned wisdom.

"Himeo," a critic might say, "where in that wall of text did you link your scientific studies that "prove" Deism. Why are you stalling? Get to the point already!"

To which I say, why are you so anxious?

I'll use Burnem Wizfyre as an example, because he volunteered.

Why does Burnem Wizfyre read this thread? I compared it to a zoo or a freak show earlier. Why are outliers so fascinating to people?

I'm proposing that the world is full of outliers, but most people who see an outlier respond like Burnem. It provokes a laughter response, "Wow, that's so retarded. How can anyone believe that?" Or, some outliers might provoke a vague fear response. "Yeah, some of those moon pictures were probably faked, but it doesn't change the fact that we went to the moon."

You're anxious for me to post my links and either laugh or feel a vague sense of fear before shrugging it off.

What I'm describing is the experience of Confirmation Bias.

Confirmation bias, also called confirmatory bias or myside bias,[Note 1] is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.[1] It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. Confirmation bias is a variation of the more general tendency of apophenia.

Click to expand...

The people on this forum are mostly young adults (Under 40) or middle-aged (40-65). That's enough time to develop a solid working model of the world. You learned this model from the people around you, just as they learned it from the people around them.

And now, we come to the first outlier, a "tinfoil hat" observation.

Edward Bernays, the man who invented propaganda.



What have you been conditioned to believe? How have you been conditioned to behave?

What are the shadows on the wall of the cave, and why do they matter to you?

More to come.

TL;DR If I show you the scientific studies right now, you'll either feel a deep sense of fear and dread before brushing it off. Or, you'll take it seriously and experience intense pain.

I'm trying to lube up this dildo, please be patient.

Himeo said:

Edward Bernays

Click to expand...

Mmm the irony. A video about propaganda and how to control people starts off by saying that a positive aspect of propaganda is being able to improve support for things like vaccines. Mmm that's rich.

Kiroy said:

This is what Himeo thinks is happening right now

Click to expand...

Bro, if you're going to photoshop yourself into a picture I insist you include dolphin dicks.

In the age of social media, astroturfing requires paid shills to maintain the illusion.

"I was a Government Paid Shill" - Health Wealth & Happiness - Relfe.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ted-paid-pro-government-shills-in-chat-rooms/

What I learned selling my Reddit accounts – Rob – Medium

Facebook’s Censorship Tool



Which, goes back to my earlier point. Who are the "trolls"? If they're volunteer trolls they normally fuck off after a while. It's the paid trolls that stick around for years pushing the same narrative to watch out for.

As an aside, the Flat Earth society is a tiny group with 5,000 members. But, if you go to their forum and ask if they're joking, paid trolls will respond instantly telling you of course it's a joke and only a total moron would fall for it. That's what sparked my interest in flat earth.

I'll be your moron. Lay it on me baby.

Well, I'm bored now. If you want to free-base the universe have fun.

Two violations of the fine tuning of the universe.







How those violations of fine tuning (violations of the speed of causality) can be manipulated, using basic math, to destroy the bullshit physicists are doing to hide God. Isn't it funny how Atheists love to use Occam's razor against arguments for God, but are coming up with ever more complicated explanations to avoid an infinite speed of causality?



Suck, it atheists. We're living in a simulation. Science proves Deism. They're going to sell it as Simulation Theory, because they cannot admit God exists. Our reality is artificial, someone or something programmed it.

Bonus: You all have magic super powers and shit.



That's what I know so far. I've been spending my time, after proving that we're in a computer program, trying to understand what software we're running on.

As crazy as it sounds, my working hypothesis is that the operating manual for the program is the KJV 1611 version of the bible.

I can get into why later.

Bonus 2: You can talk with God. Be entertained by this schizophrenic genius as he describes how he communicates with God using random number generators.



bibledice.com

Given we're living in a computer simulation, where causality and therefore mass are both infinite, ergo nothing exists...

Does it really matter what the shape of the world is?

Not really. I just find it hilarious how you cannot observe, from our perspective, the difference between a spherical earth with the currently accepted dimensions and between living on a flat plane.

We're living in a world of lies, that... oddly... all point in the same direction. It's like a big bang of lies, all pointing at the KJV 1611 version of the Bible.

Fuck I hate being crazy.

I started autistically divining the bible using Terry's random number generator method. The results are never random, and the messages I'm receiving keep telling me to stop jerking off.

Look, God, I know you're the creator of the universe and everything but that's a tough sell, bud.

MusicForFish said:

Earth's inner core shouldn't technically exist
In the paper, the researchers argued that the standard model of how the Earth's core formed is missing a crucial detail about how metals crystallize: a mandatory, massive drop in temperature that would be extremely difficult to achieve at core pressures. [6 Visions of Earth's Core]

Weirder still, the researchers said, once you account for this missing detail, the science seems to suggest that Earth's inner core shouldn't exist at all.

New conspiracy citation for them flat earthers. Your welcome.

Click to expand...

This didn't get my gears turning on flat earth, though. This got my gears turning on how the Earth formed.

I think that is a normal reaction. GOD PLEASE AM I A NEUROTYPICAL? *shakes Lumie thread prison bars*

jayrebb said:

This didn't get my gears turning on flat earth, though. This got my gears turning on how the Earth formed.

I think that is a normal reaction. GOD PLEASE AM I A NEUROTYPICAL? *shakes Lumie thread prison bars*

Click to expand...

You're suffering from confirmation bias. It's in the wall of text up there somewhere.

Outlier that fundamentally disproves Spherical earth.

"Yeah, but how is the Earth still spherical though?"

Himeo said:

You're suffering from confirmation bias. It's in the wall of text up there somewhere.

Outlier that fundamentally disproves Spherical earth.

"Yeah, but how is the Earth still spherical though?"

Click to expand...

Nothing you have posted fundamentally disproves anything.

lurkingdirk said:

Nothing you have posted fundamentally disproves anything.

Click to expand...

Because it proves everything, you just don't get it.

lurkingdirk said:

Nothing you have posted fundamentally disproves anything.

Click to expand...

Were you expecting it to? I just wanted to join the cool kids in kicking the potatoes.

Himeo said:

Bonus: You all have magic super powers and shit.



That's what I know so far. I've been spending my time, after proving that we're in a computer program, trying to understand what software we're running on.

As crazy as it sounds, my working hypothesis is that the operating manual for the program is the KJV 1611 version of the bible.

I can get into why later.

Bonus 2: You can talk with God. Be entertained by this schizophrenic genius as he describes how he communicates with God using random number generators.



bibledice.com

Click to expand...

I was totally waiting on Michael Ironside to show up and blow that guys head up.

How to win the game.

I know I'm going to regret this. But aspects of me are retard so, I'm going to ask...

If you have to whiteboard-explain faith, aren't you missing the point of faith?