Marvel Universe stuff

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
moonarchia

moonarchia

The Scientific Shitlord
23,513
42,768
spronk said:


Dumpster Fire GIF
Click to expand...

Even if he brings in Bruce Campbell to be Kang?
 
  • 1Mother of God
Reactions: 1 user
Caeden

Caeden

Golden Baronet of the Realm
7,583
12,540
Raimi is so inconsistent. He produces amazing shit. I guess the evil dead, dark man, Spider-Man 1-2. All great. Then turds like spiderman 3 and doctor strange 2. Strange 2 should have been an easy home run for this man.
 
Fucker

Fucker

Log Wizard
12,669
28,802
Chukzombi said:
www.indiewire.com

Only One 2023 Movie with a Budget Over $200 Million Has Made a Profit (So Far) This Year

As "Wish" and "Napoleon" join the $200 Million Club, we examine the increasingly slippery slope of making money on very big-budget movies.
www.indiewire.com www.indiewire.com
Of all 14 titles, seven are from Disney, nine are sequels or remakes, and five are MCU or DC Comics.
Click to expand...
Yep. Like I said, people are tired of watching the same movie over and over again. Maybe they need to try some original scripts for a change.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Homsar

Homsar

Silver Baronet of the Realm
9,427
8,336
Caeden said:
Raimi is so inconsistent. He produces amazing shit. I guess the evil dead, dark man, Spider-Man 1-2. All great. Then turds like spiderman 3 and doctor strange 2. Strange 2 should have been an easy home run for this man.
Click to expand...
I feel like I read somewhere the studio bullied him into making that piece of shit script/movie. I find it funny that people will call you racist/sexist but then you have everyone that likes American Chavez/Ms marvel
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
jayrebb

jayrebb

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
14,581
14,423
Homsar said:
I feel like I read somewhere the studio bullied him into making that piece of shit script/movie. I find it funny that people will call you racist/sexist but then you have everyone that likes American Chavez/Ms marvel
Click to expand...

Yeah it's weird because Raimi said Spiderman 3 backlash was on his mind before accepting Strange 2 job.

The movie was hacked to ribbons either way. Re-shoots plus a sizable runtime reduction despite the re-shoots all being added.

1701545765556.png


Raimi said none of the alterations and notes on re-shoots he was given were about money and box office.

Marvel only intervened to correct lore and provide fidelity.

1701545888657.png
 
Chukzombi

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
72,990
214,272
Homsar said:
I feel like I read somewhere the studio bullied him into making that piece of shit script/movie. I find it funny that people will call you racist/sexist but then you have everyone that likes American Chavez/Ms marvel
Click to expand...
I had no problems with either of those young ladies. But it sucks bad how they framed AC as having the most lesbian parents in the multiverse. Like why the fuck did you have to do that? Why can't she just be a normal girl with a normal girl family?
 
Caeden

Caeden

Golden Baronet of the Realm
7,583
12,540
Homsar said:
I feel like I read somewhere the studio bullied him into making that piece of shit script/movie. I find it funny that people will call you racist/sexist but then you have everyone that likes American Chavez/Ms marvel
Click to expand...
I definitely know he was strong armed to put venom into S3. But I think changing uncle Ben’s death was his own doing which is what made that a turd to me rather than just bloated and weak.
 
Lanx

Lanx

<Prior Amod>
65,363
147,469
jayrebb said:
Yeah it's weird because Raimi said Spiderman 3 backlash was on his mind before accepting Strange 2 job.

The movie was hacked to ribbons either way. Re-shoots plus a sizable runtime reduction despite the re-shoots all being added.

View attachment 502739

Raimi said none of the alterations and notes on re-shoots he was given were about money and box office.

Marvel only intervened to correct lore and provide fidelity.

View attachment 502741
Click to expand...
actually-nerd.gif

sounds like marvel is more scared of the nerds than interested in making a good movie
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Angerz

Angerz

Trakanon Raider
1,260
853
Chukzombi said:
I had no problems with either of those young ladies. But it sucks bad how they framed AC as having the most lesbian parents in the multiverse. Like why the fuck did you have to do that? Why can't she just be a normal girl with a normal girl family?
Click to expand...

Ask Joe Casey in 2012.

And on the topic of movie money, there is no way Disney isn't laundering some money with these movies. I know they've said some of the inflated costs are from new tech development, which should, in theory, lower costs in the future. But, cmon. There is no way that they invented enough de-aging tech for Dial of Destiny to cost 300 million dollars. Or skrull animtions for secret invasion to cost 200 million. Any one Disney project this year cost roughly as much or more than Barbie and Oppenheimer combined, and looked (at best) half as good. And they built sets for Barbie and Oppenheimer!

They've got to be shoveling extra shit onto their movie's books to get those sweet sweet tax write offs.
 
Chukzombi

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
72,990
214,272
Angerz said:
Ask Joe Casey in 2012.

And on the topic of movie money, there is no way Disney isn't laundering some money with these movies. I know they've said some of the inflated costs are from new tech development, which should, in theory, lower costs in the future. But, cmon. There is no way that they invented enough de-aging tech for Dial of Destiny to cost 300 million dollars. Or skrull animtions for secret invasion to cost 200 million. Any one Disney project this year cost roughly as much or more than Barbie and Oppenheimer combined, and looked (at best) half as good. And they built sets for Barbie and Oppenheimer!

They've got to be shoveling extra shit onto their movie's books to get those sweet sweet tax write offs.
Click to expand...
its not like Marvel never altered a character's canon before.
 
Ambiturner

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,043
19,530
jayrebb said:
Yeah it's weird because Raimi said Spiderman 3 backlash was on his mind before accepting Strange 2 job.

The movie was hacked to ribbons either way. Re-shoots plus a sizable runtime reduction despite the re-shoots all being added.

View attachment 502739

Raimi said none of the alterations and notes on re-shoots he was given were about money and box office.

Marvel only intervened to correct lore and provide fidelity.

View attachment 502741
Click to expand...

So director that wants to keep working for Marvel didn't throw Marvel under the bus?

Crazy talk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.