Should have been a draw after Germaine fouled twice. I fucking hate New York cards now because the refs and judges are both garbage.
shocking for sure, I felt that first foul was NC or DQ (depending how you want to weigh the intent of Germaine) in a smaller show where there isn't pressure to continue on the big stage.
You can't eat a shot like that after the bell and have a fair fight, its just not possible. The shot was too big to not at least have a point taken off it, but in reality, Holm had absolutely no obligation to answer the next round after that. All big show pressure and a fighters desire to continue fighting in play there.
The second foul I didn't really care about. It dealt no damage and didn't really land clean (from what I saw), so no point or NC/DQ was necessary in my book. Its that first one that was scary. You have to wonder would a male be given the same leeway? How much of a role was the NYSAC ref playing? Questions that are largely unanswered, since all fighters have respected the bell and/or not landed significant fight-outcome altering strikes.
She went out on her feet. It just shows how much flex is in the rules, you probably could push the envelope and start whacking guys after the bell ala what Cheick Kongo used to do with nut-shots. He would get at least 2 nutshots off, sometimes 3, during a fight without any real problem.
Some positive news at least on open-hand pawing being illegal now with regard to eye-pokes. That was a loophole that needed to be closed. This bell thing isn't a big of a deal as the cup-check abuse we saw during the UFC's big heyday. How many guys are going to dishonor themselves to push the envelope? Very few. Nut-shot enforcement remained the same, and fighters didn't take up after guys like Cheick.