So it was YOUR fault things went to shit!I was wondering how badly the Cavs were curbstomping the Raptors, but, what a pleasant surprise, when I started watching the game, the two teams were almost tied! My smile did not last long...
There were a lot of ticky tacky calls on the Raptors tonight. Which is fine if you're going to call that shit against the Cavs, too, but they weren't.
Right? Right?Between this and the multiple missed calls at the end of the games during the Spurs series, it is more than obvious that the NBA is in the tank for the Thunder this season so that they finally get their dream matchup of Durrant vs Lebron.
The NBA is the absolutely worst officiated professional sport. And most of it comes down to consistency. NBA officials are the most inconsistent officials not just from game to game, but quarter to quarter. It's embarrassing how bad they are. MLB plate umpires are better.Right? Right?
Maybe because its the highest tempo sport and the refs have to make more calls by far than all the other sports? Im not defending incompetence but I remember playing 3 on 3s at the schoolyard basketball court and shit was constantly going down over people being hacked, no travel calls, what should be a jump ball etc., and that was a ragtag crew of 12 year olds playing on tar.The NBA is the absolutely worst officiated professional sport. And most of it comes down to consistency. NBA officials are the most inconsistent officials not just from game to game, but quarter to quarter. It's embarrassing how bad they are. MLB plate umpires are better.
Yeah, they were rag tag, but shit was constantly going down over calls, yo! Totally relates to the NBA refs sucking!So you're comparing your retarded 12 year old self to a professional?
Ok.
Lol what?So you're comparing your retarded 12 year old self to a professional?
Ok.
The best thing to do in your situation was to double down, call people faggots, challenge whether others ever actually played basketball (which if your argument is the NBA is such high tempo whether we played would only be relevant if it was in the NBA), and then once again compare the inconsistent officiating in a professional sports to your experiences on the schoolyard.Lol what?
How the fuck did you get that out of my post? Most of you faggots never played basketball, and the point of bringing up schoolyard ball is its usually poor at best due to lack of officiating.
Ever go to a jr high basketball game and watch the ref? The guy is usually running around blowing the fucking whistle constantly, in the pro game its the same hustle except its a multi million dollar enterprise watched by millions.
Whats tougher in your sage opinion, being an NBA official or an NFL/MLB umpire?
go back and read what I wrote..You're insane if you think Lakers would trade the #2 and Russell for Okafor
Danny Ainge really wanted Robert Swift too. It's not impossible for Okafor to turn into a solid NBA player, the odds are just against him. It's not often that players play as bad as he did as a rookie but still turn into the all NBA center you project him to be. There are counter examples, of course. Lavine was absolute horse shit as a rookie and looks like he'll turn into an NBA starter after year two. But these are going to be exceptions to the rule.It's funny watching people try to diminish Jah's value. The guy has so much upside and that's why Boston went hard for him. I've been reading a lot of the mock trades with Boston and I think a lot of those people lose sight that the Sixers hold all the power in those talks. Boston wants Okafor, sounds like they want him pretty bad. I'm still using that as leverage to work with the Lakers on getting that #2 pick and Russell. We have assets to trade and the Lakers don't want to rebuild. Who knows what Indy would do if the Lakers are offering some 1st round picks and Randle for PG?
We just talked about this! I think the Lakers would be all ears on moving Russell but I think that's b/c I don't think the Lakers want to wait and build, I think they want to trade for a superstar and to do that they are going to need more assets. Overall, I think Jah had the better rookie season as well. I really don't know what gets the Lakers a guy like PG but I think there is enough noise about it that they make the phone call and find out.. If it's possible, I don't see Russell or that 2nd pick safe. I understand that doesn't mean they are coming our way either, but I get the sense there is chance for a blockbuster trade to be made before this draft and you'll disagree with this but Okafor seems to be the guy most valued in all of this.Danny Ainge really wanted Robert Swift too. It's not impossible for Okafor to turn into a solid NBA player, the odds are just against him. It's not often that players play as bad as he did as a rookie but still turn into the all NBA center you project him to be. There are counter examples, of course. Lavine was absolute horse shit as a rookie and looks like he'll turn into an NBA starter after year two. But these are going to be exceptions to the rule.
And you're still in video game world with the trades. PG isn't getting traded for a package centered around Randle. The Lakers aren't giving you their entire young core for Okafor. Noel is worth more than #6. Boston doesn't have leverage over LA in those negotiations because #3 isn't worth nearly as much as #2 this year and LA knows it. The most likely scenario here is you just draft Simmons and move forward. And then there's a slight chance that Okafor gets moved, as he's the obvious choices (Embiid has no trade value until he plays healthy, Noel is proven). But his value isn't that of multiple young assets. Swap him for Ingram, maybe. For the 3 and Marcus Smart, maybe. But since the Sixers hold all the cards here I would suggest going after Towns and Wiggins for Okafor. I mean, you have plenty of assets to get that done, right? Obviously what the Sixers hold is worth more than what any other team has.
What do you think it would cost? I think you undervalue Oak a bit and I prob overvalue but do you see the possibility of trading him straight up for Ingram? I think there is a very high chance lakers make a deal like that. And i bet they call us about it. If so, I'm bringing Russell up as a prerequisite to that deal being made. That leaves Russell for picks. Which we have. Next year we have the lakers 1st(unprotected) ours and the rights to swap 1st Rd picks with the Kings. It wouldn't even surprise me if the lakers wanted to trade Russell straight up for Oak. Obviously I'm having a little fun kicking this stuff around but i don't think it's as impossible as you think. Again, it depends on how they go at FA. If they can convince Durant to sign there and go trade for PG, well that team is looking pretty good with Oak under the rim than Russell at PG because you can still go out and get a guy like Conley to run the offense.
Ok. I'm done my GM fantasy trades!
I wouldn't trade Okafor for Ingram but I could see why the Lakers might. You aren't far off with that idea. In general you're undervaluing Russell, who was drafted ahead of Okafor and still has more potential than him or anyone in this draft. He's their future and I can guarantee the Lakers value him highly. That Nick Young video bullshit doesn't decrease his potential.
Besides Boston!How does flipping Russell and Ingram for Okafor after dealing for a veteran slow down a rebuild? Your logic is there are PGs available in FA, making Russell expendable? That's pretty weak logic I think. Are willing to wait until the offseason is over to flip Okafor for Ingram? Because I think it would be pretty dumb for a team to bank on their ability to sign a PG in free agency on draft night, leveraging their future to do so. In this scenario why is Hassan Whiteside not an equally good counter point to Conley, where the Lakers keep Russell but sign a C in the offseason? They keep Ingram in this scenario too.
All of these things can't just all magically happen. There isn't a realistic scenario where the Lakers fleece the Pacers out of Paul George (Randle and what? A 2018 and 2020 first?), keep #2 and ALSO flip it for Okafor (while throwing in Russell for good measure). It's just so far outside the realm of possibility it's not worth speculating on. The way you talk about Okafor I promise you Laker fans feel similar about Russell. And you'd say the same thing if he was on the Sixers. I understand that you think any Sixers asset is worth more than any other team's, but if you could take the homer hat off I think you'd realize that all teams value their young players and draft picks.