Can you even come close to blaming him?So the reason for Ewoks and the giant happy ending is by RotJ, Lucas cared more about toy sales than he did his film.
It is commonly thought of as the weakest of the three original movies. It's the weakest because instead of focusing on the story he focused on making sure toy sales were good. The only reason RotJ turned out half way decent is because Lucas wasn't the sole creative force behind it like he was the prequels.Can you even come close to blaming him?
RotJ was still a perfectly good ending to the series. It's fine with me if he wants to service the toys if he is still able to deliver a good product to do it with.
What is not fine is him servicing the toys and delivering a bad product to do it with. That's all that the prequels were. It's the exact same thing except in the instance of Return the movie was good. In the instance of Phantom the movie was cynically produced garbage.
There's no particular reason for RotJ to have been a tragedy. Lucas made the right call there for whatever reason he made it. If RotJ had had that dark ending, Star Wars itself would not be nearly as well remembered. Killing Han wouldn't make the movie poignant, it would work at a cross purpose to the tone of the series.
I didn't hate the ewoks. Yeah, they're kinda dumb. It's funny when they're killing AT-AT walkers with giant rocks strung to trees. Is it believable?
Is anything in Star Wars believable?
It's a creative fantasy. It's like arguing that a dragon wouldn't be able to fly. Well, of course not. That's what the magic is for.
If I recall correctly, it wasn't just going to be that Han Solo died, but that he was going to sacrifice himself to save the others. If he was going to die, I think that would've been a fitting way for him to go out. He starts off as the detached scoundrel who is in it solely for the profit who slowly comes around to their way of thinking and then selflessly puts Luke and the rebellion ahead of himself for the greater good.i know you think i'm crazy but george lucas was right about RotJ.i think killing han solo would not make any sense (all that work and then he dies?lame).
Nub nubIf I recall correctly, it wasn't just going to be that Han Solo died, but that he was going to sacrifice himself to save the others. If he was going to die, I think that would've been a fitting way for him to go out. He starts off as the detached scoundrel who is in it solely for the profit who slowly comes around to their way of thinking and then selflessly puts Luke and the rebellion ahead of himself for the greater good.
I would guess that's one of the reasons Lucas nixed the idea. You can have Han go out a hero by sacrificing himself, but the "happy ending" part of that would be completely overshadowed by the tragic ending to Han and Leia's romance.Han dying would only make sense if Luke wasn't Leia's brother. Lando and Chewie are not boyfriend material.
i don't think they were siblings when he wrote the first two movies. otherwise, george lucas is one sick mother fucker.Of course they could just not have been siblings
Leia and han were the only love story in star wars, killing him would not give a satisfying end to both characters (plus, han was very popular and his death would piss the fans).If I recall...