Nvidia has a program for game studios "helping" them with their game, and at the same time optimizing code paths in the driver for that game specifically. That is how they have special drivers for new AAA games on day one.What's wild is AMD driver updates 6 months after a game is out can produce 50-60% performance improvements. The fuck.
*6700 will compete 3070
*6800 will compete against the 3080
*6800XT will compete against the 3080 TI
*6900 will compete 3090 but will be faster than a 3080TI. Not sure if it will beat a 3090
*No word if they will undercut Nvidia pricing.
Yes my first card was an ATI which didn't even work properly for Quake 2, then I got a Voodoo 3 2000 followed by a Voodoo 5 from my first Military paycheck. That one lasted me quite a while, I don't recall what I had after that. First one I do remember is a GTX 260.Nvidia has been making GPUs since the mid 90s. By 2003-2004 they where basically 50% of the market, the other 50% being ATI.
Optane isn't a bad idea, it's just incredibly hard to get enough people to buy into something until it has developer support, and it's incredibly hard to get developer support for a product that nobody is using.Optane!
Is competeting with the 3090 even their target? In the past the titan has been a very small percentage of cards. Maybe their banking on such demand for Nvidia if they have "something" out that works reasonably well and on shelves that will fill a need.
I would say on both fronts, let's wait and see. I think they might beat Intel in gaming or at least get super close. My last machine I am (re)building is a 9900KF with a 2080TI; this time I expect to build a smaller (NZXT H1 with whatever fits graphics card and Zen3). I started to disagree with you based upon your last sentence but you are right: There have been a bunch of holdover AMD fanboys from back in the day riding the wave of AMD hype every time they launch something new, when AMD was releasing trash CPUs for the previous half a decade before Zen and Intel was growing fat and 14nm++++++++ lazy.Most of it comes down to individuals in the build-a-PC nerd culture having a lot of pent up rage towards Intel for various retarded reasons and (stupidly) envisioning AMD as some sort of scrappy underdog valiantly fighting to bring better value to CPU chips. This is nothing new and has been happening for decades, the only thing that's changed is that AMD has been making better chips the last few years. To put it all in perspective, there were morons riding AMD's jock even when they were putting out absolutely abysmal chips that no sane, emotionally-level person should ever consider buying such as Bulldozer.
If gaming is your top priority, Intel is still the way to go.
Cue AMD nuthuggers swearing that Zen 3 will beat Intel's gaming performance.
Most of it comes down to individuals in the build-a-PC nerd culture having a lot of pent up rage towards Intel for various retarded reasons and (stupidly) envisioning AMD as some sort of scrappy underdog valiantly fighting to bring better value to CPU chips. This is nothing new and has been happening for decades, the only thing that's changed is that AMD has been making better chips the last few years. To put it all in perspective, there were morons riding AMD's jock even when they were putting out absolutely abysmal chips that no sane, emotionally-level person should ever consider buying such as Bulldozer.
If gaming is your top priority, Intel is still the way to go.
Cue AMD nuthuggers swearing that Zen 3 will beat Intel's gaming performance.
Do you not understand that a stock price is meaningless without context? Go look up the market cap of Intel and AMD and report back. Better yet, go fetch Intel and AMD's net profit for Q2 2020. I'll wait.That scrappy underdog company has their stock at $76/share, while Intel has tumbled to $46/share,
Intel is a company with a history of absolutely horrendous business practices. Back in 2005 when AMD had surpassed Intel in performance and technology what did Intel do? Gave major OEMs like Dell and HP billions in bribes to not sell AMD systems. Theyve lied to their investors about their 10nm and 7nm processes. In these past few years that theyve lied to their investors and everyone about their nodes, theyve literally spent 10+ billion dollars buying back their own stock and are continuing to do so right now. Then theres the fact their CEO was fired for banging some random female employee two years ago, the fact theyve fucked over consumers by hyper segmenting their product lines and ignoring any and all calls to bring better products to the market.
Intel is rightfully vilified for being a shitty corporation. They are the paradigm of what happens when a company has a defacto monopoly over a sector of the economy. Everyone should be kissing AMD's ass because if it wasnt for them you wouldnt be buying a desktop 10c/20t processor for $500.
You forgot the biggest disaster in recent time: The Spectre + Meltdown side channel attacks, how they knew about it months in advance (due to the researchers being nice), and how they still fucked up the timing and not having mitigations ready for most of their product line. How they even lied about the performance impact of mitigations (which is 5 to 30%, depending on workload).Theyve lied to their investors about their 10nm and 7nm processes.
I thought people go to prison over that?
Yeah forgot about that whole thing. So much shit behavior from them.You forgot the biggest disaster in recent time: The Spectre + Meltdown side channel attacks, how they knew about it months in advance (due to the researchers being nice), and how they still fucked up the timing and not having mitigations ready for most of their product line. How they even lied about the performance impact of mitigations (which is 5 to 30%, depending on workload).
The CEO being fired for fucking inside the company was just a pretext in my opinion, because he was caught with his hand deep in the cookie jar: Dumping his Intel stock shortly before the Spectre/Meltdown announcement hit. No way he didn't know about such a major risk factor for the company.
I would say on both fronts, let's wait and see. I think they might beat Intel in gaming or at least get super close. My last machine I am (re)building is a 9900KF with a 2080TI; this time I expect to build a smaller (NZXT H1 with whatever fits graphics card and Zen3). I started to disagree with you based upon your last sentence but you are right: There have been a bunch of holdover AMD fanboys from back in the day riding the wave of AMD hype every time they launch something new, when AMD was releasing trash CPUs for the previous half a decade before Zen and Intel was growing fat and 14nm++++++++ lazy.
That AMD whole Marketing Dept who overhyped every release of every Video Card and CPU got shitcanned. Now Lisa Su is running a complete different ship, so much that the steamroller that is the Zen Processors caught many people by surprise. No one was expecting Zen1 to not suck, or Zen2 to be so competitive. I honestly would have probably gone AMD last time other than the actively cooled x570 chipset (stupid reason but I am still scarred from a high pitched chipset fan in the early 00s I could never fix) . I believe the same thing is about to happen in Video Cards, except nVidia isn't Intel and is actually able to compete in their space. I would be thrilled if I could get a card that is close to the 3080 that uses way less power this time and save the bigger card for whatever comes next for the RNDA3/Ampere replacement fight 2021-2022. 30-35% better than a 2080Ti doesn't sound like a huge win for me at 800 bucks.
Part of Tom's video was pulling back the cover on there deliberately won't be many of the cards announced the other day: Announcing your 3080 FE is going to be available for $699 when you are deliberately planning on not having many to sell, when the Aftermarket card makers will then come behind with a different cooler, either with a much more expensive card or with different speeds/potentially different results is shady, particularly when your are racing to beat your competition out the door. nVidia is going to deliberately short stock the market with the cards with those awesome coolers and then let AIBs fill in the gaps with cards with less nice coolers for more money. It's a story worth reporting *if and major if* its true.
Yeah forgot about that whole thing. So much shit behavior from them.
I imagine that if AMDs CEO was a pretty blonde instead of a stereotypical looking late 50s something Asian woman the msm would be all over AMD like they where for theranos and yahoo when that idiot Marissa Meyer ran it.