We haven't been in outer space for hundreds of thousands of years until the last ~5 decades! Should we stop doing that?
I'm a little out of my comfort zone, as I haven't sat there and read much of the research on this stuff. But, I've never met anyone who talks about dietary "inflammation" that can even provide a basic 12th grade biology level definition of the word. We constantly have inflammation going on in our body. Without it, we'd likely die from even the smallest wound or infection. Inflammation is sometimes/more often than not/usually a (I haven't sat here and quantified it) good thing, but when it goes unchecked it can become a bad thing (ie, chronic lower esophageal inflammation from gastric reflux leading to adenocarcinoma.) The mere presence of food in the colon likely triggers small amounts of inflammation, after all we're secreting gastric acid into the stomach (which of course can protect itself from it, but have you heard of ulcers?). And with digestion, as we move food through the colon, we're pushing food up against delicate epithelial membranes that get damaged and slough off, and localized inflammatory responses trigger the production of new membranes and healing in the gut. But with regards to people who usually are speaking about diets, I haven't seen any data that shows a measurable increase in systemic inflammation upon drinking milk. Ie, elevations in ESR/CRP or other acute phase reactants. I may be wrong, but I haven't come across it, and if it's out there, I'm betting it's pretty insignificant.
Yet again, no. Neither should you stop driving cars, watching TV, using the internet, taking modern medicine when necessary, getting any needed surgery done or even eating food that people didnt have access to 20,000 years ago if it is shown to be healthy. Cavemen didnt eat olives, olives are ok on the diet because they are a good source of fat.
Knock yourself out:http://robbwolf.com/2011/01/12/hey-r...ets-are-bogus/
You are convinced? Are ya? Really? Because your massive research over a 3 week period into the diet that you are currently following, pushed by people who have their own version of the diet, and therefore their agenda completely revolves around the diet, has flat out convinced you?
Sure, Duppin is usually a fucking retard. However, even Tards can be correct on occasion and this is one. There are many things that contribute to heart disease. You can't single out one and ignore the rest. Mr 3 weeks.
I never disagreed that the over consumption of sugar is a problem. I even wrote that you can't just single one contributor. Diet science simply isn't that straight forward.
So why did you create a post that spawned a 28 page thread on a diet you swear has worked for you over a nice scientific 3 weeks, but have conceded you don't even follow religiously and are planning on straying from it completely.
I'm just curious. When you write declarative statements like these, are you aware that you know essentially nothing about what you're stating?
See I think you're stretching here. The bulk of the paleolithic diet is 'eat like we evolved to eat' which excludes a lot more than large consumption of sugar and refined foods. Call it a natural or organic diet, call it a good diet, call it what you want, but the paleolithic title demands more than just cutting out refined foods and sugar.
