Pit bulls - The Breed of Peace

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
quickly hoss, 13/16 of an inch + 3/32 of an inch +1/8 of an inch +11/64 of an inch.

Show us the superiority of imperial and non base 10 decimals!!
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
rrr_img_132997.jpg
 

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
27,189
15,312
OK now do it in metric. Why come you metric people keep expecting us to solve stuff for you and you won't solve it too? Oh yeah it's cause metric is for PWABAM.

You are just more comfortable with imperial units because you were though how to use them in school at an early age. It has nothing to do with it being a simpler/better system.
WHAT A TWIST! If only someone had said that on the last page ....

Wait, in school? Are you saying eurofags need a class to learn to use metric? If so, I've been giving it too much credit.
 

Frenzied Wombat

Potato del Grande
14,730
31,803
God the stupid is strong in you.. I love how an engineer-- someone that should be able to do advanced calculus in his sleep, uses grade 3 level multiplication/division skills as the barometer for what is "hard math". In Hoss' world, "PWABAM" is defined as those who don't know how to do long division, not differential equations.

First you said it was easier, then you said it doesn't matter 'cause "calculators", now metric is just for stupid people who don't know grade 3 math.

Dude, if Imperial works for you great! There is nothing "wrong" with it per se, and there's nothing "hard" about it. But to deny that metric is a simpler system that arrives at the same result is sheer stupidity. This fact isn't an attack on you, nor 'Murica favoring imperial-- but you're arguing over a universally accepted fact..
 

Palum

what Suineg set it to
26,508
41,231
I'm sorry I must have missed it, did a pitbull kill Hoss' math teacher and that's why we're having this discussion in this thread?
 

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
27,189
15,312
lol

Not an attack on you but you're a VACUOUS TOFFEE-NOSED MALODOROUS PERVERT!!!

That's some trump level debate tactics there brosky. I don't understand why you people want me to keep repeating the same thing over and over again. Do you just like how I use words? It's all still there, just go back and re-read it.
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
Aren't they civil liable for what the dog do already?
FL law
767.04 Dog owner's liability for damages to persons bitten.-The owner of any dog that bites any person while such person is on or in a public place, or lawfully on or in a private place, including the property of the owner of the dog, is liable for damages suffered by persons bitten, regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owners' knowledge of such viciousness. However, any negligence on the part of the person bitten that is a proximate cause of the biting incident reduces the liability of the owner of the dog by the percentage that the bitten person's negligence contributed to the biting incident. A person is lawfully upon private property of such owner within the meaning of this act when the person is on such property in the performance of any duty imposed upon him or her by the laws of this state or by the laws or postal regulations of the United States, or when the person is on such property upon invitation, expressed or implied, of the owner. However, the owner is not liable, except as to a person under the age of 6, or unless the damages are proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of the owner,if at the time of any such injury the owner had displayed in a prominent place on his or her premises a sign easily readable including the words "Bad Dog."The remedy provided by this section is in addition to and cumulative with any other remedy provided by statute or common law.
LOL at the Bad dog part.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,426
49,042
Aren't they civil liable for what the dog do already?
FL law
LOL at the Bad dog part.
Yes but I mean criminally liable. You think the people who have fucking killer packs dogs running loose in the neighborhood aren't judgment proof?
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
Well bro, as a dog owner if you wan to send me to jail for my dog biting you, then F U !!
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,426
49,042
So, you buy/adopt a dog, you fail to train/control it, you allow it to come in contact with me, and it harms me... but you're not liable? Sounds like good logic. Guess I should strap up so I can shoot dogs that get close to me, since nobody will be liable if it hurts me.
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
Same way people who hit people with their cars don't go to jail. And they hit lots of people.
Civil liable I'm all for it, criminal liable, of course not. I didn't do anything.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,426
49,042
Same way people who hit people with their cars don't go to jail. And they hit lots of people.
Civil liable I'm all for it, criminal liable, of course not. I didn't do anything.
You really think a traffic accident involving necessary transportation is the same thing as a pet capable of killing people on its own which the owner fails to restrain?

Really
 

Frenzied Wombat

Potato del Grande
14,730
31,803
Same way people who hit people with their cars don't go to jail. And they hit lots of people.
Civil liable I'm all for it, criminal liable, of course not. I didn't do anything.
Drivers that hit people/cars who were grossly negligent (drunk, texting, etc) while driving are generally criminally negligent. If the person you hit dies it's called vehicular manslaughter, but Cad probably knows the nuance better than I. There's a big difference between a general car "accident", and one where the driver is getting a BJ and steers into oncoming traffic.

So I should be able to starve pitbulls, start walking them around people I detest in the hopes they get mauled, and then I get to walk away Scott free? If you are walking a big and/or mean dog without a leash and it attacks someone, that is 100% your fault and you should be punished accordingly. Letting your 120lb Doberman or Pitbull off the leash where it goes on to maul a child or Chihuahua is not an "accident", it's gross stupidity/negligence on your part.
 

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
27,189
15,312
Dallas examines loose dog laws after deadly mauling - Lakewood/East Dallas

If your dog attacks someone you should face charges as if you did it yourself. No exceptions.
As long as you mean dogs running loose (which I am assuming since the article is about loose dogs), then that's cool. If you jump into my yard and get mauled though, fuck you. Maybe give me the medal my dog just earned for cleaning up the streets. "As if you did it yourself" is good phrasing too, that way there's a possible out if it can be proved the person was antagonizing the dog and you would have been within your rights to defend yourself in the same situation.