I thought about looking up bites and even other dog maulings. But he said murders, and I figured we probably have the best stats on actual deaths. Dog kills and maulings can and do often go unreported, so we'd be down to relying on estimates.But those are just actual deaths. I'd rather not get mauled and live either all things considered. Quick googling shows 4.5 million bites reported per year, with 22% being from pit bulls alone. So I can get a pit and have a 0.3% chance of being bitten per year, or I can get dozens of other breeds and have 0.00% chance of being bit per year. Again, its not like there's a shortage of dogs to pick from or that pits bring something else to the table, they literally only bring violence to the table.
I can see why his propaganda site doesn't push the non fatal bites stat since only 22% of those are done by pit bulls. Your numbers don't add up, BTW. If only 22% are from pits, 78% of bites are coming from all those other breeds.
Despite being 20% of the population, they account for 22% of all reported dog bites. I mean, that's pretty much what you'd expect if they weren't any more likely to bite a person than any other dog.