Pokemans and how to catch them with your phone - friend codes in OP

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Fifey

Trakanon Raider
2,898
962
It pains me to say it but Tyen is right, catching Pokemons is just the beginning of this thing and I'm afraid of where it's going to end up with all the data that will be collected.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

mkopec

<Gold Donor>
26,235
39,941
I just dont see this data being relevant other than maybe trying to monetize this shit further as in hey, pay us and well put a poky stop or gym, or rare spawn near you.
 

tyen

EQ in a browser wait time: ____
<Banned>
4,638
5,164
I just dont see this data being relevant other than maybe trying to monetize this shit further as in hey, pay us and well put a poky stop or gym, or rare spawn near you.

because dumb
 

tyen

EQ in a browser wait time: ____
<Banned>
4,638
5,164
So fucking explain it to me, bro. Instead of calling me dumb. So I R smart too!

grafs

42Jy4.jpg
 

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234
Tyen, your theory relies on believing that no one was already using the GPSs in our phones to map things out. Pokemon didn't suddenly make it possible for that. There are already backdoors that allow our phone GPSs to function even when we have them "off".
 

Borzak

Bronze Baron of the Realm
25,443
33,205
One of the reasons Austin got rid of Uber and Lift was they wanted a cut of the money they make from location information of who goes where to buy/do what. After they couldn't get a cut the hard press was on to get rid of them for "safety" reasons. Look at the database uber must have by now.

Semi related saw an article today but only glanced at it, Pokemon is racist because there are moke pokemon stops in areas that are well off/white than in black/hispanic areas. They compared Manhatten to Queens and Bronx which seemed really odd.
 

tyen

EQ in a browser wait time: ____
<Banned>
4,638
5,164
Tyen, your theory relies on believing that no one was already using the GPSs in our phones to map things out. Pokemon didn't suddenly make it possible for that. There are already backdoors that allow our phone GPSs to function even when we have them "off".

PokemonGo is a game w/ GPS where Niantic can have their users go wherever they want.

No one has ever had that power in a game or even a website.

The closest we got is "Hey, Yelp said this place was cool, lets go there." Now people are being led by pixels to a destination for pixel acquisition while their location data will be sold.

They are straight up going to be charging retailers for them to get people to go to their locations, and then charge them more everytime they spin the stupid pokestop or catch a pokeman.


Niantic is going to have Google levels of power in 5 years if they don't kill off their userbase with this stupid tracking problem. It's just a simple bard/ranger/druid track to a mob. easy right?
 

Ukerric

Bearded Ape
<Silver Donator>
8,311
10,289
do you move while you take a picture? No, you do not.

You don't record a single location. PokemonGO records the entire route(+more) someone takes from an undefined A to B. Different from a direction search on a google map.
Niantic uses Google's "use" maps. They spawn pokemon according to how many people use their phones while stationary (to avoid having extra densities on commuter roads where there are lots of people with phones, but they're not actively using them and they're moving).

Did you think they individually tried to find where parks were, and type them in by hand? Nope. They just use "this is a spot where people like to stop walking and use their phones", and it gives them the best density.

That data on what people are doing already exists. Niantic isn't gathering it, it's already gathered and they've just purchased it (which is easy, Google has shares in Niantic I think).
 

tyen

EQ in a browser wait time: ____
<Banned>
4,638
5,164
There are two different types of spawn locations. Around a pokestop, and "random."

Pokestops are at every single landmark type. For a laymans example, parks.

Their database existed pre-pokemon into ingress. The one I am referencing with pokeman spawns are the pokestop spawns, not the random overland spawns.


The data that people are doing doesn't already exist. All this new GPS data from pokeman players have not existed before and PHD scientists are in demand at Niantic at the moment via job recruitment.
 

Fifey

Trakanon Raider
2,898
962
Niantic uses Google's "use" maps. They spawn pokemon according to how many people use their phones while stationary (to avoid having extra densities on commuter roads where there are lots of people with phones, but they're not actively using them and they're moving).

Did you think they individually tried to find where parks were, and type them in by hand? Nope. They just use "this is a spot where people like to stop walking and use their phones", and it gives them the best density.

That data on what people are doing already exists. Niantic isn't gathering it, it's already gathered and they've just purchased it (which is easy, Google has shares in Niantic I think).

And let's say Niantic decided to test the waters and start adding Pokestops somewhere else and now they've got the data points measured on how effective it is as a form of advertising.

Shit, there is already a level of subversiveness with Facebook. I worked at a place then facebook added the guy on my suggested friends list like a week later and me and the guy have absolutely no common friends/anything. I'm a 30 year old white guy from Arizona and he's a 50 Vietnamese immigrant, no way for them to link us except for GPS tracking.
 

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
47,398
80,865
There are two different types of spawn locations. Around a pokestop, and "random."
I don't believe this to be true. Unless it's changed I believe that all pokemon spawn either because of lures, incense or static spawn locations. The static spawns correspond to XM Pools.


I hope they allow their database to be used or licensed in some way for future MMARGs. The pokemon game they've built is good, not great, and I can see much better games in the future, I just hope that everyone doesn't have to spin up their own global population database.
 

a_skeleton_02

<Banned>
8,130
14,248
Tyen is completely in the right here, the amount of evil these companies could do with this information is staggering. Our locations,trends,routines are all already mapped out but Pokemon Go has the unique advantage of being able to influence new trends.

They already have shown they can turn on and off "hotspots" we had people coming from hours away to a park near my house because it spawned Charmander. When they moved it 45 minutes away to FDR park in Philly everyone followed. This was a test in my mind to see if they can influence migrational patterns..

This is all obviously theoretical but they could manipulate traffic patterns for mundane things like McDonald's promotions or maybe more nefarious things.

Right now small businesses are the ones reaping the benefits of Pokemon Go. Places at are smaller and more agile can adapt to these changes faster than a chain. But what happens when McDonald's buys up all the Pokestops in town and makes sure all other food places can't get one. No law on the books could stop that and it would just be another death knell for small business.

On a more conspiracy level, you could use this as a tool for gentrification(add rare Pokemon/items to lots for sale in bad neighborhoods) imagine if they turned the DNC into a rare Pokemon nest the mix of protestors and regular Pokemon players would probably cause the whole thing to break down because you can just label them as Pokemon players or protestors depending on your spin.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,739
52,293
The lack of logical thinking here is fucking retarded.

You know what would have happened if they had moved the Draconian Deflector from UBRS to LBRS back during vanilla WoW? I would have farmed LBRS instead of UBRS. The idea that people following nests around is Niantic 'influencing migrational patterns' has to be one of the dumbest fucking things I've ever read.

insert everyone is now dumber video here.
 

mkopec

<Gold Donor>
26,235
39,941
The idea that people following nests around is Niantic 'influencing migrational patterns' has to be one of the dumbest fucking things I've ever read.

insert everyone is now dumber video here.


Well they kind of are. Especially when they fully roll out the new tracking system. You bet your ass they can influence the migration patterns of poky hunters.

My only gripe in this whole conversation is other than maybe trying to monetize this or gather data for another game of this type, I dont see this "data" being of any use. Maybe another would be to sell it to some PhD to gather more data for coming up with new swarm algorithms. But even that is a stretch.

The biggest addition to this game type happened already with Ingress. when they had users plug coordinates and take pictures of landmarks to populate the system. And they had them do it for free too. Now they have an extensive database of landmarks, historical sites, churches, shit like that to use in other games or sell to other game makers trying to come up with more Virtual overlay games like this.

And if they do in fact monetize this to, say, get people to go to Mcdonalds, I think there will be a big backlash from users.