I have a thing for Tweety Bird tattoosFrenzied has a thing for Koi Fish... hrmmmm
I have a thing for Tweety Bird tattoosFrenzied has a thing for Koi Fish... hrmmmm
Am I missing something? Koi fish are a very popular Japanese style tattoo.Frenzied has a thing for Koi Fish... hrmmmm
Have you seen sleeves on:We aren't talking about you wanting to fuck a full-sleeved person or not, we're talking about the work place. Or at least that picture, Alex, and myself were. Maybe it's because Alex and I live in California, but really, it's not a big deal and you can even see it on police, city/county office workers, high-paid white collar professional, etc.
Depending on your career choice and your aspirations within that career, it could be a "big deal". Though people on those paths should already know that. I personally know at least two people that got lesser ink lasered off as their career progressed because they didn't want to be judged or limited by it. One of those was an exec at a marketing agency. It varies firm to firm; I'm sure ink is completely accepted at some agencies.Full sleeves really aren't a big deal for either sex.
Oh yeah, definitely. I wasn't saying anything weird about it. Koi fish are obviously a top 5 tattoo all over the world. Super popular. I see em every day.Am I missing something? Koi fish are a very popular Japanese style tattoo.
Oh no worries, I don't think you're attacking me. I just think we live in very different parts of the country. You also list professions (usually) filled by old(er) men so I think that skews the demographic too. I'm not saying you can become POTUS with lots of tats, I just don't think that pic is accurate with regards to this particular type of tat.Have you seen sleeves on:
- Any VP+ officer at IBM or Goldman Sachs? - I don't know any
- Any surgeon? - yes actually, not full, maybe 3/4, does that count? SFGH - Kuriin works there I think (?) and may know more
- A director of any NASA facility? - I don't know any
- The superintendent of a large school district? - again, about 3/4, close enough? What qualifies as large?
- Partners at a large law firm? - only one I know is an old Jewish guy so, no
Maybe it is more accepted than I thought. I've never seen ink on a MD or a school district officer. Which is why I used them as examples, but apparently they aren't as universal as I thought.Oh no worries, I don't think you're attacking me. I just think we live in very different parts of the country. You also list professions (usually) filled by old(er) men so I think that skews the demographic too. I'm not saying you can become POTUS with lots of tats, I just don't think that pic is accurate with regards to this particular type of tat.
Anyways, I don't even have a single tat, so I have no dog in this fight /shrug
I'm not sure there is a consensus. While I would say that Match is good because it got me my current serious relationship, another person will say they had shit luck with it.So, what was the consensus on decent sites? Friend of mine suggested I do Tinder, but not sure I'm cool with giving them access to my FB
You don't need to find the best site because it widely varies geographically. If you're not on all the major ones you're doing yourself a disservice.So, what was the consensus on decent sites? Friend of mine suggested I do Tinder, but not sure I'm cool with giving them access to my FB
Tinder is low effort, but it can be feast or famine. Some chicks just use it for ego boost and either never respond, or just phish for complements with no intention of dating. I initially had *AMAZING* success with it, but it's petered off somewhat. The biggest negative is that it doesn't contain any basic info unless they write it in their caption blurb, which means you can match with someone, start chatting, then find out she's religious or has kids and end up wasting your time. Match and other sites force you to fill this info out, so you don't waste time messaging people that don't align with your basic criteria. On the flipside, you frequently message people on these sites that aren't interested, while with Tinder you know right off the bat that they are at least superficially interested.So, what was the consensus on decent sites? Friend of mine suggested I do Tinder, but not sure I'm cool with giving them access to my FB
Isn't that normal for Tinder because when you first signed up, you rated a million girls and all the current girls saw you as new, so they'd all rate you at once. Once you're through the current "pool" you only get new users so the flow of matches should slow down considerably after the initial rush.I initially had *AMAZING* success with it, but it's petered off somewhat.
Hah, I was referring to quality not quantity, Miss Rachel to be specific. But you are correct in a sense, you get the most matches at the start because you're going up against the whole existing community, then once you run through that you average about 50 new matches per day depending on your specified range.Isn't that normal for Tinder because when you first signed up, you rated a million girls and all the current girls saw you as new, so they'd all rate you at once. Once you're through the current "pool" you only get new users so the flow of matches should slow down considerably after the initial rush.