They apply to every woman. However, society, for literally thousands of years, had socially constructed, often religious, constraints in place (from stoning, to burning at the stake, to ostracization, to slut shaming) before those constraints were totally broken up by feminism and the sexual revolution. The fear of eternal damnation seemedsomewhateffective in curtailing hypergamy.I think you'll find we've said pretty consistently from the beginning that these RP concepts only apply to a certain subset of women. Since you seem to agree with that now (since you say they don't apply to your mom, for example) all thats left is to argue over how big the subset is.
To your first paragraph, you're sitting here saying that their "limbic impulses" completely overpower rational thought and they WILL act on those impulses, regardless of what they know to be good for them. Now you're saying that social structures were able to keep them from doing it? Really? You don't get both. Pick 1.They apply to every woman. However, society, for literally thousands of years, had socially constructed, often religious, constraints in place (from stoning, to burning at the stake, to ostracization, to slut shaming) before those constraints were totally broken up by feminism and the sexual revolution. The fear of eternal damnation seemedsomewhateffective in curtailing hypergamy.
Serial monogamy is a part of sleeping around, by the way. It is less, to be sure, but there is a lot of women who go from relationship to relationship (~2-6mo) in duration pretty consistently. I know many of them, if those are the ones you're referring to.
Respect is earned, not given freely.Also, again, you come down to "can't treat them as an equal, shouldn't treat them with respect". Maybe your whore used-up mother didn't teach you this, but adults should treat everyone regardless of their sex with respect, up until they give them a reason not to. Too bad your whore of a mother was too busy blowing pickup artists in backalleys to teach you how to interact with other humans.
No, societycancurtail it to some extent, but never completely. History is our lesson. People will still try and do fulfill that impulse, but it'll be much less at the threat of literally torture or death.To your first paragraph, you're sitting here saying that their "limbic impulses" completely overpower rational thought and they WILL act on those impulses, regardless of what they know to be good for them. Now you're saying that social structures were able to keep them from doing it? Really? You don't get both. Pick 1.
To your second paragraph, your serial monogamy criticism goes completely against your entire "behave like an alpha, get bitches who are ovulating because its attractive to them" game. If they're serially monogamous 6 months at a time, THEY ARE NOT ACTING ON THOSE IMPULSES. They're having short but stable relationships where they are using their brains.
Again, pick 1. You're basically just going to sit here and say anything women do besides sitting in a convent waiting for Captain Dumar to rescue them from their stupidity is "hypergamy".
Why do you sound so horrified at women having sex? You sound like a conservative christian in all this.There's a reason it's called serial monogamy. It's thenot quite slutsluts. They're certainly not as bad, but again, you've got these women who are close to 30 who've literally been in something like ~15 or more relationships in the past 10 years or so.
So I guess all we have to do to get women to behave the way Dumar wants is to threaten them with torture or death. That sounds reasonable.No, societycancurtail it to some extent, but never completely. History is our lesson. People will still try and do fulfill that impulse, but it'll be much less at the threat of literally torture or death.
And how many chicks have you banged in the last 10 years Dumar?There's a reason it's called serial monogamy. It's thenot quite slutsluts. They're certainly not as bad, but again, you've got these women who are close to 30 who've literally been in something like ~15 or more relationships in the past 10 years or so.
So doesn't this invalidate your entire argument?You're not thinking about anything I'm saying. There were social restraints in old-school America that stopped women from more or less slutting it up to the level they do today. My mother got married at 23, as many women did back then. The age at which women marry has been increasing. I don't even know what it is now. 28, 29?
To think I sound enlightened compared to him ...Why do you sound so horrified at women having sex? You sound like a conservative christian in all this.
Yup. Horrifying.To think I sound enlightened compared to him ...
Why don't youfucking readinstead of blindly and moronically throwing up posts? Jesus christ. I saidfeminism gave women a choice to be sluts, and they should have that choice, but there are consequences in choosing.Why do you sound so horrified at women having sex? You sound like a conservative christian in all this.
You didn't answer my question. Why do you sound so horrified at women having sex? It just really seems to make your skin crawl, those women becoming used up husks. Why is it such an overriding concern for you?Why don't youfucking readinstead of blindly and moronically throwing up posts? Jesus christ. I saidfeminism gave women a choice to be sluts, and they should have that choice, but there are consequences in choosing.
He did read. You are the one that was earlier foaming at the mouth over word definitions and you use the word "slut" and think nobody should think that is a negative thing against women .... can that word ever be used nicely?Why don't youfucking readinstead of blindly and moronically throwing up posts? Jesus christ. I saidfeminism gave women a choice to be sluts, and they should have that choice, but there are consequences in choosing.