Science Ethics and Racism in Drug Enforcement Thread

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Anthropology is nothing but ditchdiggers putting on airs.

Seriously though, studying ancient cultures is awesome. I really wish we knew more about the bronze age civilizations before the Catastrophe. Just so much of history is almost blank since they didn't have written history and/or little survived. Listening to the History of Rome podcast and it is funny to think of how so many of the cultures attacking Rome are just called "barbarians" simply because we know so little about them. Figuring that shit out, filling in the swiss cheese of what we know about history, is a noble pursuit.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
We definitely dig a lot of fucking ditches lol.

Yeah the History of Rome podcast is probably one of the best podcasts I've ever had the joy of listening to.

And its funny you mention how we view all opposition to the Romans as "barbarians", just like the Romans did. That's one of the best illustrations of the usefulness of cultural relativism in ethnographic and archaeological research. They really weren't barbarians, and we've found with archaeological and geographical research that the majority of the roads the "Romans" built were probably first built by the Celts, who built in wood and lacked written records.

The Romans conquered them, rebuilt the roads in stone, and took the credit.
 

reavor

I'm With HER ♀
<Bronze Donator>
5,292
18,384
Unfortunately, there is a biological basis for race.http://time.com/91081/what-science-s...-and-genetics/. It's social scientists who pretend there isn't one because it's not a socially acceptable thing to say, usually.

That's true, there is actually no divide between the sciences in as such that social science is essentially simplified biology, which is simplified chemistry, which is simplified physics. Math being the basic tool of these fields.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
Unfortunately, there is a biological basis for race.http://time.com/91081/what-science-s...-and-genetics/. It's social scientists who pretend there isn't one because it's not a socially acceptable thing to say, usually.

That's true, there is actually no divide between the sciences in as such that social science is essentially simplified biology, which is simplified chemistry, which is simplified physics. Math being the basic tool of these fields.
Lol no. Would you like me to cite all 31 pages of my final paper for my capstone class in my undergrad career in Anthropology here, complete with citations? It was explicitly rebutting Nicholas Wade's assertion that "evolution is regional in human populations".

Geneticist claims for race are founded in flawed sampling methods that emphasize taking samples from the most distant geographic regions, ignoring the clinal variation of intermediate populations.

Also, its funny, but every single researcher Wade cites for his book....has condemned his conclusions as not representative of their work. Including Noah Rosenberg, Neil Risch, etc.

I suggest instead of reading a pop cultural "science" journalist's speculatory fictional accounts of human variation and his perspective on why it justifies racial mythology, you check out an academic work such as David Serre and Svante P??bo's "Evidence for Gradients of Human Genetic Diversity Within and Among Continents" instead.

You might learn something.

Here I'll help you out with a link to the work with no paywall.

Evidence for Gradients of Human Genetic Diversity Within and Among Continents

You might also check out the 2009 issue of the American Journal of Physical Anthropology titled "Race Reconciled" for about 12 long form rebuttals to virtually every claim Wade makes, prior to his even making them.

Link here, all the articles can be downloaded for free from this link

American Journal of Physical Anthropology - Volume 139, Issue 1 - Race Reconciled: How Biological Anthropologists View Human Variation - Wiley Online Library

You might also read "Anthropology of Race" as well, for some really relevant works on the subject.

Anthropology of Race: Genes, Biology, and Culture (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series): John Hartigan: 9781934691991: Amazon.com: Books

And Jefferson M Fish's "Race and Intelligence" as well

Race and Intelligence: Separating Science From Myth: Jefferson M. Fish: 9780805837575: Amazon.com: Books

Note that I read probably over 50 works to write my paper, and had to whittle it down to less than 18 because otherwise I was going to end up writing an entire book as well. Wade's case is so bad that the only problem I had rebutting it was choosing what to leave on the cutting room floor so I didn't end up giving my professor a heart attack by laying a 500 page final paper on his desk at the end of the semester.
 

Asshat wormie

2023 Asshat Award Winner
<Gold Donor>
16,820
30,968
Math being the basic tool of these fields.
Math is not a tool of the sciences. Math is God and the little peons that are the sciences are its creations.

As for social sciences, my biggest disappointment when it comes to those subjects is the lack of rigor in a lot of assumptions. Now this disappointment is born strictly from my degree in economics (specifically the realization that homo economicus is a large load of shit); I have no exposure to anthropology/sociology/whatever outside the standard_college_101_class but it seems to me that my issues with those topics would be similar. This isnt to say that those subjects are not important or valid, its just that a large number of people can claim to be experts in those fields while spouting off absolutely non sensical bullshit and claiming it as "science." Of course these days I consider anything less rigorous than math to be the equivalent of kids playing in the mud as the adults watch so maybe I am just retarded.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
You and I are in complete agreement that there are aspects of these fields that lack enough rigor. That's why I ended up not just majoring in Anthro, but also have been finalizing a double major in bio/chem as well.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Okay great you are majoring in anthropology in undergrad. That doesn't make the field magically the most important thing when talking about all the sciences.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
Bro, you're misunderstanding me. I'm not making a claim of one field being superior to another. This isn't a race or a competition. They're all equally useful, in different ways. That's why the chart shouldn't be linear at all, but instead a web of interwoven connections.

If we view knowledge as a web, then (for us at least) human society/the human experience is the center of that web. Anthropology is the study of that phenomena, so it is the glue that binds it all together. That's all.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Bro, you're misunderstanding me. I'm not making a claim of one field being superior to another. This isn't a race or a competition. They're all equally useful, in different ways. That's why the chart shouldn't be linear at all, but instead a web of interwoven connections.

If we view knowledge as a web, then (for us at least) human society/the human experience is the center of that web. Anthropology is the study of that phenomena, so it is the glue that binds it all together. That's all.
False. Again, inputting your own bias to say how essential the field is to others.

It is all just relative, especially depending on what in particular you are studying, but I'm sure you won't admit that.
 

Palum

what Suineg set it to
27,509
43,788
Anthropology is universally revered as the most important science by the same UN committee that enforces the rigid and fixed standard code of ethics.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
Anthropology is universally revered as the most important science by the same UN committee that enforces the rigid and fixed standard code of ethics.
Let's not start with all the butthurt laden strawdogs again

False. Again, inputting your own bias to say how essential the field is to others.

It is all just relative, especially depending on what in particular you are studying, but I'm sure you won't admit that.
I don't even think what you're saying disagrees with me, honestly.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Let's not start with all the butthurt laden strawdogs again



I don't even think what you're saying disagrees with me, honestly.
You are saying anthropology is "the glue that binds" the web of science together. This is biased and I'm saying depending on what subject is being studied/investigayed creates a web that is relative to this fact. So in some instances, chemistry will be the glue, others, physics. Not always anthropology, actually probably very rarely.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
I agree that perspective most certainly defines how we view that web. And anthropology is fundamentally about the ways in which perspective defines reality for the subjective viewer/experiencer. Its funny but you're actually making ananthropological argumenthere, and in the process, confirming my position.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
No. Jesus fucking christ. Keep trying to justify majoring in a scientific field that makes you virtually unemployable compared to others.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
There's always field work in archaeology bro. If I was an ethnographer I'd worry about employment more.

Anthropologists and Archeologists : Occupational Outlook Handbook: : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Quick Facts: Anthropologists and Archeologists
2012 Median Pay $57,420 per year
$27.61 per hour
Entry-Level Education Master's degree
Work Experience in a Related Occupation None
On-the-job Training None
Number of Jobs, 2012 7,200
Job Outlook, 2012-22 19% (Faster than average)
Employment Change, 2012-22 1,400

Also there's always teaching medical students. Lots of bio-anth majors teach pre med anatomy/physiology classes to future doctors and nurses.

And education.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
Back to the butthurt and strawmanning, this time we're engaging in prognostication strawmanning.

rrr_img_95734.jpg
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Teaching? You going to be an adjunct professor? Better off being on unemployment. Again, stop trying to justify poor life choices.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
The 10 Worst College Majors - Forbes

Topping the list at No. 1, anthropology and archeology represent the worst choice of college major in economic terms. Recent college graduates of the major, those ages 22 to 26, can expect an unemployment rate of 10.5%, well above the national average. When they do land a job, the median salary is just $28,000, compared to a mechanical engineer?s initial earnings of $58,000.

There you go. keep claiming otherwise though.