- 25,949
- 51,173
Which means we don't understand it at all.Gravity is a finicky bitch that we don't quite understand on extremely large and small scales fully.
Which means we don't understand it at all.Gravity is a finicky bitch that we don't quite understand on extremely large and small scales fully.
No. If we did not understand it at all we wouldn't know the constant of gravity on Earth and would not be capable of putting satellites in orbit or any number of less complex tasks.Which means we don't understand it at all.
Understanding its practical effects and understanding how it works are different things. Even in Roman times they were able to accurately aim projectiles based on calculating gravity's effect, even though they had no idea what gravity even is.No. If we did not understand it at all we wouldn't know the constant of gravity on Earth and would not be capable of putting satellites in orbit or any number of less complex tasks.
You used only "understand".Understanding its practical effects and understanding how it works are different things. Even in Roman times they were able to accurately aim projectiles based on calculating gravity's effect, even though they had no idea what gravity even is.
Relativity has been proven correct in enough applications that it's reasonable to claim we understand the big picture of how gravity works. Admittedly we still have to work out the details though.Understanding its practical effects and understanding how it works are different things. Even in Roman times they were able to accurately aim projectiles based on calculating gravity's effect, even though they had no idea what gravity even is.
Even worse.Oh right. Escape velocity. Vodka is even worse at science than I am.
I won't disagree that relativity is by far the most correct model of gravitation we have so far.Relativity has been proven correct in enough applications that it's reasonable to claim we understand the big picture of how gravity works. Admittedly we still have to work out the details though.
Not sure exactly what you're getting at, but light always travels in a straight line from the light's perspective.Even worse.
Light will always move by the shortest possible path between two points. The shortest possible path is not always a straight line, in fact it is often some sort of curve or arc or squiggle when you consider a large enough context. But in the case of black holes the path is actually a circle/closed loop.
Right, hence the details that need to be worked out.Relativity breaks down on the galactic and sub atomic scales
Nope.Relativity breaks down on the galactic and sub atomic scales