Screamfeeder's Joint

Foler said:

I have a competition in me. I want no one else to succeed. I hate most people.

Click to expand...

Sorry man. I love you.

OwO whats this?

Bandwagon said:

God fucking damnitt....I had a novel of an explanation typed up for you, then I got interrupted at work and closed it. It's 5:05 and you get the short version.

I really hate taking moderator action based on subjective interpretation. The exception is when I feel like there's enough trending data that I can comfortably defend that decision to myself. That defense isn't usually publicly posted, but I think it's reasonable to ask the mods to make a real defense of those.

I was a little on the fence with your situation because you can be a rabblerouser just for the sake of rousing rabbles. That's the "trending" consideration. I still don't like the idea of censoring you while you're being a relentless dick and demanding an explanation, because the request for an explanation is valid. I'm fine with that occurring in the shaw, and it occured in the shaw because you wackos are forcing us to be more strict with censoring certain proclamations (and bitching about it at the same time). I also think it's acceptable to have a line of exhaustion where we feel that the decision has been sufficiently explained and you're free to disagree with it as much as you want, but disagreement + disruption will potentially get you back in the hot seat again. I do think that LLR took action for 3 reasons:
1. We weren't doing our jobs
2. He wants the suicide directive shit to end, as well as the game of dancing around it.
3. You are predictable (trending).

Those aren't his words or explanation, but the way I read it. The only reason I wasn't 100% on board with it was because you were in the shaw and I don't see the harm of doing that in the shaw as long as you don't get too close to the line of a clear rule violation.

Does that make sense? That's a legit question....I'm trying to summarize the novel that I had written before I head out the door and i'm not proof-reading this thing. I'm not trying to "educate" you, I'm trying to explain my own thought process and give you the opportunity to shit on it if you want. It's the shaw....who cares?


P.S. - I also chalk up a lot of your asshole trending to the shit you catch around here, which is often bullshit. Constantly tagging someone that's not currently in the conversation is a douche move.

P.P.S. - Right Woolygimp ?

Click to expand...

It somewhat makes sense. Your point of view makes sense but your context is a bit wonky and you're approaching it from an angle I am not and that I don't think you're able to see. I am not going to (really) shit on you because while I do give you a ton of grief, you do get it. I just think you don't get it completely.

At the core, my issue is this.

Users should be allowed to say whatever they want so long as it's not illigal. I should be allowed to reply to them, using their own words however I want, so long as it's not illigal. If they wants to drop N-bombs or make vague references to certain activities, (which a certain member has a LOOOOOOONG history of) then I want them to be able to. I also want the ability to reply and say "Look at this motherfucker saying this shit."

It's honestly that simple. But this is now the 5th time I have been in trouble for doing exactly that. I know that I am an agitator and to be honest, I am proud of being an agitator and to be double honest, this forum could use a few more agitators. I am SUPER predictable. You say bad shit, I am going to pop in, call you on your dumb shit and not let go. This almost always ends with me being shawed/banned and no one else being punished. No joke this is number 5.


Does this sound like whining? Maybe. It's not. One of my two reports said "This isn't going to go the way you think it is." and it didn't. I have greater faith in this community than certain people and I know exactly how it's going to shake out. I knew the second I got shawed (I did think I got banned immediatly because I was unable to do anything other than report or post in the Comments section [LLR even said it was a glitch]) that I was getting full blown banned. I also knew a few people would recognize this for what it was and say something. Not only the members here, but the mods as well. I knew I would get unbanned and to be honest, the shawing SHOULD be removed but certain peoples ego's could never take that kind of hit so I'll be right here until January making sure the bullshit doesn't get too thick on the outside. And the second I am out of here, you bet your ass I will be right on whatever bullshit arbitrary line LLR or the current mods want to invent in order to keep their slobbering hoard of circle-jerking biscut eaters in line from ACTUALLY whining and bitching to the point where action MUST be taken.

The only thing that has surprised me about all of this is that there were still 2 mods that were totally on board with banning a member from the shaw for posting the facts about the issue to counter the lies already posted. Nevermind the fact I was shawed in the first place for simply pointing out what another member said. I am not letting that go and I shouldn't, because it's bullshit and this place could really use a few more people calling out the bullshit.

Go back and read the massive email I sent to a_skeleton_03. I told him almost the exact same thing and was banned for it. Problem was, the board rallied, said "This is bullshit" and here I am. And here we are again homie. And we will be here again. I have been here over 20 years and it's going to take a lot more than the Token Nazi Admin/Mods Of The Week to change that. This is coming from a former Nazi Mod on Rerolled/Morenetz so don't take it too personally.

Bandwagon said:

Didn't I put a "I think" qualifier in there?

Click to expand...

You didn't.

Here is your exact quote....

Bandwagon said:

I also think that people should use the godamn ignore function if you don't like hurty words.( Speaking of which, the two people that got shawed are sure as fuck not shy about using the report button for hurty words.).

Click to expand...

I highlighted the relevant portion for you.

I never used the report button for hurty words. I used it to call LLR a cocksmuggling douchcannon, predict his abject failure at being a StrongMan and flip you all the middle finger. And I used it twice. How many times did my detractors use it? I use the report button either sarcastically to annoy the mods (totally earning me a few infractions in the past) or as a last means of communication with the few people that still have working frontal lobes on the Mod team (I include you in that category, your NaziMod classification not-withstanding).

ZyyzYzzy said:

TLDR. Stop being a fag, fag.

Click to expand...

Church.

ZyyzYzzy said:

TLDR. Stop being a fag, fag.

Click to expand...

It should have read

TLDR : Stop being a fag, fag.

You use a colon when trying to enhance the word or statement before the secondary line. You're welcome Z.

pharmakos said:

Oh shit Screamfeeder I PMd you but you probably can't reply to it, whoops

Click to expand...

I can, I'm just trying to make sense of it...little scrambly my dude. But I work with some wackadoo writers so I'll piece it together and reply later.

So I'm going through my stash of hidden jew gold trying to figure out which mods I would give a payout toward.

I know that both Zyyz and Bandwagon are on the side of True Justice (cocksucking fucktards they might be) but I am at a loss for the third...

Denariamamrian is obviously an LLR cuckold so he is right out.

That leaves me with OhSeven and Boozecube.

I am leaning very heavy toward OhSeven only because I think I have been less of a cock toward him than Booze in the past, even though Booze has dropped some worfs on my posts.

I need a hint so I know where to send my stolen Nazi hoard.