My experience with CenturyLink sucked a lot on initial setup, but since then it's been pretty good overall. Every 6 months or something there will be a day where the internet is out like 12 hours or something, but generally speaking no problems.Yea, the 1gb from Comcast I have is nice, but not necessary by any means, and it's still over copper, not fiber.
I've never had CenturyLink but have had a number of friends sign up for them from the door to door salesmen, and it's always been a bad experience. This makes sense though because they are putting the salesmen in the middle and expecting everything to work out.
Both of those decimals need moved two places to the right.Well, if it makes you feel better, here's my data meter 1 day after the reset...
View attachment 329945
And here's my un-throttled speed test at 6:15 PM on a Tuesday night.
This is why I'm excited about Starlink.
yea i've had to deal w/ that bullshit since i've been here in ks, i always go 10gb just under the monthly
yea i've had to deal w/ that bullshit since i've been here in ks, i always go 10gb just under the monthly
Beta testers are getting 100MB down, 20MB up and 30ish mS pings. That blows hughesnet out of the water. So far there's no data cap either where Hughesnet caps you at 10-50 GB depending on your plan. Hughesnet and Viasat claim to be 25MB but you never actually get that. A lot of times it's less than half that and of course 600ms+ pings.Is Starlink actually gonna be that fast? I guess I was under the impression that it would be a slightly faster HughesNet, which is super slow and high latency.
i know our viewing habits so rarely does it go over, it sucks but cox has an app that shows data usage and i put it on my phone widget, i'm sure you probably have the sameComcast pushed the data cap back until August in Massachusetts thanks to lawmakers finally saying how BS it is. But it's coming, I have no doubt.
Starlink uses low earth orbit satellites. They are like 2-400 miles away. Hughesnet and Viasat have a single satellite in geostationary orbit which is like 25000 miles away so they are pretty much limited by physics to a shitty latency. LEO means you need way more satellites and a much more sophisticated receiver, but it solves the latency problem.I dont know how they beat the latency issue. Math is math. The distances to a satellite and back are real. Light still has a finite speed and it takes time to get from point A to point B. Granted its pretty fast, but those satellites aren't 10 feet away.
Well, if it makes you feel better, here's my data meter 1 day after the reset...
View attachment 329945
And here's my un-throttled speed test at 6:15 PM on a Tuesday night.
This is why I'm excited about Starlink.