Poll Should Tanoomba's ban be lifted

Free the moonbat?

  • Yes

    Votes: 61 40.1%

  • No

    Votes: 91 59.9%
  • Total voters
    152
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
kegkilla

kegkilla

The Big Mod
<Banned>
11,320
14,743
@Amod please quote the original text of Tanoomba's post(s) where it was decided a threat was implied before he edited it.
 
  • 1Salty
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users
khalid

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Picasso3 said:
Think about this.
Click to expand...

I did, how about YOU think about it?

Tanoomba decided to get into a semantic debate about whether or not he had threatened doxxing. The mods should and did say "Fuck that shit".
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
kegkilla

kegkilla

The Big Mod
<Banned>
11,320
14,743
can someone link whatever Tanoomba's most known avatar was? need it for something
 
  • 2Salty
Reactions: 1 users
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Its been quoted time and again.

This thread should be shawed at this point.

We're just hashing the same argument, and the poll is irrelevant. Anyone who hasn't figured out that Khalid is right about this by now is trolling.

Tanoomba's entire posting history is "Make an outrageous claim he means 100% seriously, then backpedal and semantics it as far as he can take it."
 
  • 1Salty
Reactions: 1 user
P

Picasso3

Silver Baronet of the Realm
11,333
5,323
khalid said:
I did, how about YOU think about it?

Tanoomba decided to get into a semantic debate about whether or not he had threatened doxxing. The mods should and did say "Fuck that shit".
Click to expand...

I thought about it and thought maybe you should as well because the conclusion I reached was that you admitted he was banned for something he stopped short of doing and were undermining your own position.
 
  • 3Like
  • 1Salty
Reactions: 3 users
kegkilla

kegkilla

The Big Mod
<Banned>
11,320
14,743
jihodj said:
Its been quoted time and again.

This thread should be shawed at this point.

We're just hashing the same argument, and the poll is irrelevant. Anyone who hasn't figured out that Khalid is right about this by now is trolling.

Tanoomba's entire posting history is "Make an outrageous claim he means 100% seriously, then backpedal and semantics it as far as he can take it."
Click to expand...
Point to one post in this thread where it has been quoted.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
In fact, since Keg is too fucking stupid to read the thread, the relevant quote is quoted on the first page of this thread.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
kegkilla said:
Point to one post in this thread where it has been quoted.
Click to expand...

Very first page, by the fucking thread maker himself, you goddamn retard.

Feanor said:
Are you seriously asking me to be Paul Giamatti's John Adams for Tanoomba.

Here is the evidence without speculation. Tanoomba chimping out last time shown below
Aug 27, 2016 https://www.firesofheaven.org/threa...-and-delusions-or-ttphad-for-short.5/page-253

His original posting

same posting after the fact

Context



The rest you can glean for yourselves.
Politics Thread
Starting two pages before the offense.

No retelling, no misinformation. Make up your own minds whether he deserved a ban.
Click to expand...
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
khalid

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Picasso3 said:
I thought about it and thought maybe you should as well because the conclusion I reached was that you admitted he was banned for something he stopped short of doing and were undermining your own position.
Click to expand...

You don't get to play around with threatening of doxxing. If you don't think that is against the rules, go ahead and try it a few times. Maybe you will get away with it for a bit, but if you keep doubling down on it, I'm guessing it will go bad for you.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
jihodj said:
In fact, since Keg is too fucking stupid to read the thread, the relevant quote is quoted on the first page of this thread.
Click to expand...
Don't be too harsh. kegkilla kegkilla identifies as a 9 year old (for pedo reasons) so he doesn't have the greatest reading comprehension.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
This "Free Tanoomba" talk would come across a lot less like trolling and crocodile tears if it had occurred when a_skeleton_03 banned him for three months for literally nothing, but you all missed the boat on that one.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
kegkilla

kegkilla

The Big Mod
<Banned>
11,320
14,743
jihodj said:
The unedited post is in that post, you fucking mongoloid mouth breather.
Click to expand...
No it isn't, and there's no threat to be seen there, unless it was edited out:

Tanoomba said: ↑
Then you're a fucking coward.

You've surrendered to your opponent because you're scared of a label. You're giving them more power and rewarding their tactics.

For shame.

(Post edited to protect posters' feelings)
 
  • 2Salty
Reactions: 1 users
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
kegkilla said:
No it isn't, and there's no threat to be seen there, unless it was edited out:

Tanoomba said: ↑
Then you're a fucking coward.

You've surrendered to your opponent because you're scared of a label. You're giving them more power and rewarding their tactics.

For shame.

(Post edited to protect posters' feelings)
Click to expand...

It was edited out, and the full text is included in the post I cited.

This is why I just said this

jihodj said:
This "Free Tanoomba" talk would come across a lot less like trolling and crocodile tears if it had occurred when a_skeleton_03 banned him for three months for literally nothing, but you all missed the boat on that one.
Click to expand...

And that post by you Keg, does nothing but demonstrate the truth value of that claim.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
P

Picasso3

Silver Baronet of the Realm
11,333
5,323
khalid said:
You don't get to play around with threatening of doxxing. If you don't think that is against the rules, go ahead and try it a few times. Maybe you will get away with it for a bit, but if you keep doubling down on it, I'm guessing it will go bad for you.
Click to expand...

What if i say

"If your mother read this post she'd be very disappointed in you"?

You're expanding into an ambiguity that's completely unnecessary.

Was tanoomba malicious, no.
Was he stating an intention, no.

He fell short and you had to ban him because "he knew what he was doing by not breaking the rules"
 
  • 3Like
  • 1Salty
Reactions: 3 users
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
khalid didn't ban him. He wasn't a mod anymore to do so.

Stupid once again.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users
khalid

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Picasso3 said:
Was tanoomba malicious, no.
Was he stating an intention, no.
Click to expand...

I disagree and clearly some of the mods did also.

When you want to play semantic games with doxxing, it becomes the mod interpretation that you have to deal with. Or you know, you could not be a total cunt and play winkwink games with threats of doxxing. JustTanoombaGames.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users
P

Picasso3

Silver Baronet of the Realm
11,333
5,323
khalid said:
I disagree and clearly some of the mods did also.

When you want to play semantic games with doxxing, it becomes the mod interpretation that you have to deal with. Or you know, you could not be a total cunt and play winkwink games with threats of doxxing. JustTanoombaGames.
Click to expand...

Ok i guess we'll just lay and and wait to see if he comes after zyyz now, not like he has anything to lose now.

Zyyz have you updated your mcafee?
 
  • 5Like
  • 2Salty
Reactions: 6 users
Status
Not open for further replies.