I think it would have been cool to have A ninja buzz saw Jedi aka a Mace Windu or something that excelled in swordplay/acrobatics. But yeah, everyone a ninja was a bad decision.
Yeah, that's why Disney bought it for $4B (the same price they paid for Marvel) and each canon movie was either the biggest opener or biggest grossing movie of the year or both when they were released. Because they were divisive.
Universally popular might be hyperbole but don't be dense, this is a train wreck BECAUSE of how popular and loved Star Wars is/was. People don't want to hate it, they're being pushed away by agenda/ineptitude/misreading the audience.
Your ability to gauge the cultural pulse is off.
Chuk is actually correct. "They're all in purgatory" was the original fan theory all the way from Season 1.Wat? No one accepted Purgatory as an explanation until the end of this garbage.
It was one of the many theories. It was not the accepted theory.Chuk is actually correct. "They're all in purgatory" was the original fan theory all the way from Season 1.
nerds could go one and on about the extended universe in reality it hasn't been good since the early 80s
Could it be that this is another edgy take from a FOH blowhard? It just might be!1996 Kevin J. Anderson-edited Tales of the Bounty Hunters
Only because of some reddit AMA or something like that where the showrunners were like "nope that's not it!"It was one of the many theories. It was not the accepted theory.
Extra-galactic invaders called the Yuuzhan Vong, kick the shit out of the New Republic and the Imperial Remnant after dropping a moon on Chewbacca. Han and Leia's youngest son dies which is a big part of what eventually drives Jacen Solo the dark side, becoming known as Darth Caedus and being a general galaxy wrecking badass until he is eventually killed in a lightsaber duel by his twin sister Jaina.
But that's more like episodes 7-12, or even 7-15.
Ok I said I was done here but fuck I can't let that pass because that goes beyond not paying attention to the sequels it's like basic movie watching 101 right there.
Are you really arguing why Leia and Han named their kid Ben after the man that :
- saved Luke and Leia's mother after Vader left her for dead so she could deliver the babies
- brought Leia to her adoptive family on Aldeeran and Luke to the Lars on Tatooine and watched over him for 20 years
- had served her father during the Clone Wars, which is why her message called for his help
- launched a mission to rescue her, then sacrificed his life to give them time to escape
- further helped Luke from beyond death so he could topple the Empire and restore freedom to the galaxy
as opposed to the man that :
- betrayed them at Cloud City, leading Han to torture, freezing and capture by Boba Fett and Jabba.
- later made up for it by infiltrating Jabba's Palace, saving Han and helping in the battle of Endor.
I mean, both are heroes, but clearly if I had to pick which one I want my kid named after, I'd choose Ben too. Plus Lando Solo kind of sounds retarded.. which I guess would fit right into the Star Wars naming scheme, so you have a point there.
And yes I know in the classics Leia had no idea Obi-Wan did some of those things for her in retrospect, but Luke must have told her everything about it after ROTJ and that's how the decision to name the kid Ben came from.
Seriously, there's enough bullshit and terrible stuff in these sequels to nitpick and hate, but THAT is what triggers you?
Wait, what? How in the fuck was TLJ "Luke's movie"???? Aside from making him an insufferable cunt drinking blue alien tit milk and bitching about everything and not doing anything until his retarded end. It was a movie to destroy the character of Luke Skywalker, I will concede that. Along with Vader's redemption, he helped save the fucking known universe from evil. And then it was "fuck your lightsaber" and blue alien tit milk.
And why would anyone who Star Warses give two flying fucks about Princess Leia?? She was a secondary character, the Princess Peach of the original Trilogy, the damsel in distress, but the whole "Luke's Sister" meant pathetic scrambling to get a "strong female" - better than Mary Sue Rey, I suppose. Carrie Fisher was, by all measures, a nasty addict and horrible to work with, and disliked by almost everyone........no one wanted to showcase her in anything. Seriously.
Anyway, I will give you that TFA could be construed as "Han's" movie, if only because he only had one in him, so they had to send him off somehow. That old geezer was not coming back for more.
Jesus, I sound so angry, lol. Anyway, if your premise was the "original plan" then they failed before they even started. Clearly, I guess.
So the question now is where does SW as a franchise go now? What would you guys like to see, lets say it was gonna be good (lol)
Is there a summary of what the EU's episodes 7-9 were supposed to be?
Extra-galactic invaders called the Yuuzhan Vong, kick the shit out of the New Republic and the Imperial Remnant after dropping a moon on Chewbacca. Han and Leia's youngest son dies which is a big part of what eventually drives Jacen Solo the dark side, becoming known as Darth Caedus and being a general galaxy wrecking badass until he is eventually killed in a lightsaber duel by his twin sister Jaina.
But that's more like episodes 7-12, or even 7-15.
Is it explained where the Alliance (or whatever they're called now) get all their troops/fleet from after being wiped out last movie?
Thrawn trilogy by Timothy Zahn. It's the best Star wars content ever written by far.
But how, if the EU ain't been good since 1980?
Marvel movies held to established lore, from what I understand.
Start wars literally disregarded all the lore, and embarked on an epic sjw marathon of shit.
There was easily a decade of solid Star wars lore they could have used.
Is it explained where the Alliance (or whatever they're called now) get all their troops/fleet from after being wiped out last movie?