- 25,795
- 50,589
How do you quantify that in a comparable way?An above average 9th grader from Kentucky in 1912 I guess?
How do you quantify that in a comparable way?An above average 9th grader from Kentucky in 1912 I guess?
Speaking from the position of having actual live experience of being in front of actual college students, I can say this is just stupid.(mean) average college student in 2023 = dumb dumb
That's the question, what do you suggest? I am more interested in the results than my bias being proven correctly.How do you quantify that in a comparable way?
Since there is no way to go back in time to have the 1900's kids take the tests differently, find me a test that was administered to a relatively average high school class (and to ALL of them, not just the ones going to college or the ones in prep school) and the answers they gave, then we can give the same test to a group of "average" high school kids (not prep school kids and not nogs) today and see how they do.That's the question, what do you suggest? I am more interested in the results than my bias being proven correctly.
Do they learn anything though, or just progress? It seems like the rate of remedial education is pretty wild. No idea if this source is good or not.Speaking from the position of having actual live experience of being in front of actual college students, I can say this is just stupid.
Do we have dumb college students? Yes we do. Especially in athletic programs.
Is the "average" college student dumb? No.
Have things like texting, social media speak, never reading a book outside of academic requirements eroded some of what us old people would call basic skills? Yes.
The "average" student at a 4-year university has been through College Algebra and Stats. Not everyone takes Stats and this is especially true for liberal arts majors. Dumb people cant pass college algebra and stats.
I think the big hurdle hitting this discussion is trying to pin it to one variable (kids today are dumb). There isn't one variable at play. If we did a linear regression on it, we would have lots of statistically valid variables in play.Do they learn anything though, or just progress? It seems like the rate of remedial education is pretty wild. No idea if this source is good or not.
16 Upsetting Stats About College Remediation Rates [2023]
What should you know about the college remediation rates in the US? Read our comprehensive statistics to find out.whattobecome.com
I don't consider someone who learned about basic trig or quadratic equations remedially in college to be 'smart' in math objectively. You could argue to me they were just completely ignorant, but I feel like that isn't the case given their alleged education? Wouldn't your argument therefore be that all high school education = so bad people are wildly retarded, but average college remedial classes = so good if makes most people smart?
Seems like you need to find some evidence of such a quality difference when these curriculums are generally kept roughly aligned by accreditation. Ostensibly this claim is that high school = so bad its nonfunctional (Edward James Olmos hasn't shown up yet) but the local community college = post Olmos.
Dumb people cant pass college algebra and stats.
I guess I would argue the null hypothesis is that human intelligence hasn't changed measurably in the last century, provided you control for extreme conditions (e.g. severe caloric defensive deficiency).I think the big hurdle hitting this discussion is trying to pin it to one variable (kids today are dumb). There isn't one variable at play. If we did a linear regression on it, we would have lots of statistically valid variables in play.
I don't consider that subset of students to be in the category of " average college student ".Not sure I can agree with this in modern Academia. There's tons of evidence that many, many, colleges are rubber-stamping more and more "students of color" because they believe they should, or need to. You might be right that a dumb white student can't pass those classes, but I don't think that's true of non-whites.
Passing in this context is "given a passing grade and credit for the course, regardless of actual work done or prowess displayed."
There might have been some good research on this except a couple decades ago, research into IQ was deemed "racist".I guess I would argue the null hypothesis is that human intelligence hasn't changed measurably in the last century, provided you control for extreme conditions (e.g. severe caloric defensive deficiency).
The follow on to that, is then a question as to are people smarter, that is, are they better able to express their intelligence in measurable ways?
I don't consider that subset of students to be in the category of " average college student ".
Your crazy if you think those hours aren't billable.Man you can really tell when the week before Christmas hits because people are stuck at work but not actually working. The shitposting goes up 10 fold around here. I don't think I've seen this many Cad posts in years.
The average college student needs to know a lot of other shit not on that test, not just to succeed in school, but also to exist in modern society.View attachment 505093
Do you actually believe the average college student in 2023 could pass the test that was posted?
The average college student needs to know a lot of other shit not on that test, not just to succeed in school, but also to exist in modern society.
They did not need to spend a bunch of time learning how to drive a car, operate a computer, etc. They also didn't need to learn about the past century's vast scientific advancements. People in 1900 still thought flies spawned from leftover meat.
People dramatically underestimate the cognitive overhead of modern life, or how much new knowledge has been created every year over the past century, and how much it continues to accelerate. Also underestimated is the amount of noise we're bombarded with daily. That the average college student is probably a bit worse at doing advanced trigonometry by hand is a small cost.
I remember you're dumb every time you post.Retention is the issue with modern learning. Nobody remembers anything bc their brain is in their pocket. And that’s v dangerous.
I remember you're dumb every time you post.
Retention is the issue with modern learning. Nobody remembers anything bc their brain is in their pocket. And that’s v dangerous.
Ftfy... but I also get the sum total of human knowledge (edited to remove anything Big Tech finds distasteful) and computation at my fingertips with instant global communication.
Ftfy