The Astronomy Thread

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
45,523
73,613

What's funny about the flat earth society is that it's a collective troll-job. There are some very well-educated people that support it and make the kind of arguments you could only make if you knew a lot about physics, ephemeris, space etc. And there are a lot of less-educated people who read those arguments and poorly repeat them.

I didn't listen to that 'debate' long enough to know where on the spectrum the flat-earther fell, but I do know that seriously contending with a flat earther makes you the biggest ass in the room.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Palum

what Suineg set it to
23,747
34,560
What's funny about the flat earth society is that it's a collective troll-job. There are some very well-educated people that support it and make the kind of arguments you could only make if you knew a lot about physics, ephemeris, space etc. And there are a lot of less-educated people who read those arguments and poorly repeat them.

I didn't listen to that 'debate' long enough to know where on the spectrum the flat-earther fell, but I do know that seriously contending with a flat earther makes you the biggest ass in the room.

Nah. This is a great corollary to SJW anti-science. Everyone thought "oh cute, bunch of dumb women making their own department at the school, isn't that adorable... doesn't affect me because I'm a real scientist!" Look at you now, patriarch.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Mudcrush Durtfeet

Hungry Ogre
2,428
-758

The relevant portion:

"White and his team couldn't rule out all sources of experimental error, for example".

Extraordinary claims requires exraordinary proof, which obviously has not (and most likely will not) occurred.

Something that seems to break the laws of physics, when tested, needs to rule out all sources of experimental error, else I'm betting on the laws of physics here.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Ukerric

Bearded Ape
<Silver Donator>
7,977
9,690
Something that seems to break the laws of physics, when tested, needs to rule out all sources of experimental error, else I'm betting on the laws of physics here.
About every review of the paper I've seen says the same thing:

- They appear not to do a thorough set of tests that check various aspects of the system
- They don't provide critical details on how they account for measurement errors

The reason they haven't a launch date or anything for their spaceborne experiment is that, given the paper quality so far, they have like 0.02% chance of persuading a funding committee.

The best illustration for the EM Drive:

unicorn-microwaves-800x450.jpg


(the discussion on how this illustration came to be on Ars Technica... is ROFL worthy)
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

LachiusTZ

Rogue Deathwalker Box
<Silver Donator>
14,472
27,162
The relevant portion:

"White and his team couldn't rule out all sources of experimental error, for example".

Extraordinary claims requires exraordinary proof, which obviously has not (and most likely will not) occurred.

Something that seems to break the laws of physics, when tested, needs to rule out all sources of experimental error, else I'm betting on the laws of physics here.

Your parachute is that way ----> Next to the pile of shit that you left in the floor.

Also, +1 for you knowing all of the laws of physics. Not like new discoveries have ever been made in physics. (Learn the word "known" to avoid this confusion in the future)
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Mudcrush Durtfeet

Hungry Ogre
2,428
-758
Your parachute is that way ----> Next to the pile of shit that you left in the floor.

Also, +1 for you knowing all of the laws of physics. Not like new discoveries have ever been made in physics. (Learn the word "known" to avoid this confusion in the future)

You smell and you dress your mother funny.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

meStevo

I think your wife's a bigfoot gus.
<Silver Donator>
6,395
4,662
A single miscalculation sent ESA’s Mars lander crashing into the Red Planet

...the craft’s Inertia Measurement Unit — which is designed to measure how fast the vehicle is rotating — conducted its measurement for one second longer than it should have. This single piece of miscalculated data essentially ruined the whole party.

When Schiaparelli’s navigation system began using the incorrect figure to gauge the craft’s altitude, it generated a negative value, meaning that the vehicle thought it was actually below ground level.

So, thinking that it had already landed, Schiaparelli tossed its parachute and protective shell, and began deploying its ground systems, despite the fact that it was still tumbling towards the rocky surface of the planet in a total free fall. You can imagine the result.
Color shell, parachute and crash site here if you hit play:
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Abefroman

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
12,588
11,904
You are being redirected...

Water ice makes up half or more of an underground layer in a large region of Mars about halfway from the equator to the planet’s north pole, scientists say. The amount of water in this deposit is about as much as in Lake Superior, which holds 10 percent of Earth’s surface fresh water and by volume is Earth’s third-largest lake, behind Lake Baikal in Siberia and Lake Tanganyika in eastern Africa. A radar aboard NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter assessed the amount of water present. The research was published September 26, 2016 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

BrotherWu

MAGA
<Silver Donator>
3,074
5,869
A single miscalculation sent ESA’s Mars lander crashing into the Red Planet

...the craft’s Inertia Measurement Unit — which is designed to measure how fast the vehicle is rotating — conducted its measurement for one second longer than it should have. This single piece of miscalculated data essentially ruined the whole party.

When Schiaparelli’s navigation system began using the incorrect figure to gauge the craft’s altitude, it generated a negative value, meaning that the vehicle thought it was actually below ground level.

So, thinking that it had already landed, Schiaparelli tossed its parachute and protective shell, and began deploying its ground systems, despite the fact that it was still tumbling towards the rocky surface of the planet in a total free fall. You can imagine the result.
Color shell, parachute and crash site here if you hit play:

Seems like something that would show up in testing...
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
It probably was. And it probably passed.

That is a very finely tuned piece of engineering. One second made the difference. You're literally talking about a fluke. You can't plan for that, you can't even create redundant systems for that. Redundant systems would cost you time and you have no time to spend.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,306
-2,235
that failed ESA landing really put into perspective for me how amazing our space exploration successes really are. one second can make the difference between your multiBILLION dollar machine doing what its supposed to or blowing up. and despite that, we have a satellite orbiting pluto and we landed a robot on a freaking COMET. just wow.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users

BrotherWu

MAGA
<Silver Donator>
3,074
5,869
Actually one second in a real-time system is a looong time for a mission critical activity such as this. I'm genuinely interested in the root cause of the malfunction.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Ukerric

Bearded Ape
<Silver Donator>
7,977
9,690
Actually one second in a real-time system is a looong time for a mission critical activity such as this. I'm genuinely interested in the root cause of the malfunction.
Fixed point arithmetic overflow.

It's not the first time such stuff did bite astronautics. Another well documented case of overflow was the first Ariane 5 booster launch. The original software had worked well for the Ariane 4, so it was kept. Unfortunately, the more powerful boosters gave higher speed for the early launch phase, which led to an arithmetic overflow, which was "impossible" (it was, for Ariane 4), and caused computer shutdown (and the booster flying eratically, so they used self-destruct).
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

meStevo

I think your wife's a bigfoot gus.
<Silver Donator>
6,395
4,662
Looks like Russia had an anomaly in the 3rd stage of a Soyuz launch this morning and lost the Progress capsule. Just supplies, not astronauts, thankfully.

Doesn't create any issues w/ the station, as there's a JAXA launch 12/9.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

meStevo

I think your wife's a bigfoot gus.
<Silver Donator>
6,395
4,662


Cassini began its new mission phase, called its Ring-Grazing Orbits, on Nov. 30. Each of these weeklong orbits -- 20 in all -- carries the spacecraft high above Saturn's northern hemisphere before sending it skimming past the outer edges of the planet's main rings.

Cassini’s imaging cameras acquired these latest views on Dec. 2 and 3, about two days before the first ring-grazing approach to the planet. Future passes will include images from near closest approach, including some of the closest-ever views of the outer rings and small moons that orbit there.

"This is it, the beginning of the end of our historic exploration of Saturn. Let these images -- and those to come -- remind you that we’ve lived a bold and daring adventure around the solar system’s most magnificent planet," said Carolyn Porco, Cassini imaging team lead at Space Science Institute, Boulder, Colorado.

The next pass by the rings' outer edges is planned for Dec. 11. The ring-grazing orbits will continue until April 22, when the last close flyby of Saturn's moon Titan will once again reshape Cassini's flight path. With that encounter, Cassini will begin its Grand Finale, leaping over the rings and making the first of 22 plunges through the 1,500-mile-wide (2,400-kilometer) gap between Saturn and its innermost ring on April 26.

On Sept. 15, the mission's planned conclusion will be a final dive into Saturn's atmosphere. During its plunge, Cassini will transmit data about the atmosphere's composition until its signal is lost.​
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users