Well, if you think about it, the more you reboot Windows, the more corrupt the files become, too. I don't have to reinstall Windows every year, either. Just replace a hard drive once every couple of years because those tend to wear out quicker because they're moving most of the time.That is a good point Sean - going console does allow a certain level of slack that can't always be done on PC.
hodj: Odd, my electric engineer bro-in-law and sister-in-law were always subscribed to the idea of turning them off as well and one of them was the first suggesting it to me to do so. Perhaps they were wrong though - shrug.
I wake up and I see pages of PCFags being PCFags in a console thread. Clearly we need a PCFags thread.
I think people are underestimating how much power you will need to run a game well. No longer are you going to be able to buy low-mid level stuff and get away with running a game at 90% of its potential. Just look at the leaked Watch Dogs specs (which have actually gone up in a second leak). It's going to take a lot more power to run games, especially going into the next year.
I personally do not want to deal with any of that. I can buy a $400 box and be good enough for the next 6-7 years and being that I'll be playing on a 1080p TV I wouldn't see a noticeable enough upgrade in performance going with a high end PC for me to give a shit.
PC gaming will be great for those who play on 1440p and 2160p monitors that require a boatload of extra power. For those of us who primarily game on TVs these new consoles (or at least the PS4) bring enough to the table that there's not going to be a huge difference when gaming on a 1080p display, especially once they drop cross-gen games and engine optimization gets improved and they push more power out of the little boxes.
Also I'm more poorer than all of you COMBINED. Or something.
Go make a PCFag MasterFags thread.
Heh, that's a nice summary for me that I probably should've stuck to (although not quite 40 yet... still got another 4 weeks...)... both are nice to have if you can afford the money/time/space to make appropriate use of both.As a 40+ year old gamer I play and enjoy both platforms. I had the joy of experiencing both of them in their infancy stages (Commodore 64 and Atari 2600) to today systems. Never really understood the PC vs console debate. Just seems pointless to me.
I would say stick to the wireless 360 controller for the PC if you are using it in the living room. Batteries are so cheap now anyways that charging isn't an issue. When I have friends over it's a lot nicer in the living room to have the PC tucked beside the TV stand with the wireless dongle. I cant imagine having four 12 foot USB cables hooked into controllers running across the entire living room.Not to mention that you can get a 10-12 foot USB extension cable for about $1 online if you need more distance with your controller. I used a wireless controller with my 360 for all of about a week, until I tried to use it one day and it wasn't charged. That was the end of that. Spent a couple bucks on USB extension cords and have used them ever since.
It appears everyone wants a piece of the console pie lately. Following the heels of Android-based gaming hardware Ouya and The Shield comes M.O.J.O., Mad Catz's Android-powered micro-console set for release this December.
Specifications of the console is as follows:
. NVIDIA Tegra 4 T40S 1.8GHz Processor
. 2GB RAM
. 16GB internal storage
. HDMI out capabilities with full 1080p resolution
. Bluetooth
. microSD Flash Slot with support for SDXC Cards up to 128GB
. Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n
. Android 4.2.2 operating system
The console will be able to play games from a number of digital marketplaces like Google Play, TegraZone, Amazon, and others. M.O.J.O. will come pre-loaded with Google Play and NVIDIA TegraZone.
It'll support 5.1 channel surround sound and comes with a controller called the GameSmart C.T.R.L.R Wireless Gamepad. The controller will utilize Bluetooth and contains volume and playback controls for video and music. It'll also be able to emulate mouse/touchscreen controls by activating the mouse mode, allowing players to use the left analog stick to move a cursor. It can also be used for other Android devices like your smartphone.
If you're interested, the console will be sold for $249.99 and will be released on December 10, 2013. You can find out more about the micro-console as well as pre-order options at the official site here.
Does this seem like something you would try out? The release date seems a bit late when compared to next-gen consoles and perhaps a bit high when compared to the Ouya.
Well, to be fair, the thread does say Xbone Vs PS4 Vs PC. So since this thread is not based on consoles only, I do not think it is out of bounds at all to discuss why people should bypass this console generation entirely, especially since Steam has their shit together with great gaming deals, and with cross platform development, PC ports utilize the same type of controller control natively, with an addition of running in higher resolution and more power. The price difference after accessories isn't far off these days. Add in additional yearly fees to play games online which doesn't exist on the PC, the same functionality for Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime - - Aside from some exclusives, the long run haul compared to what we have seen on market place pricing for Xbone (A joke) and even taking account better deals on the PS store and value of PS Plus - with Steam sales, mod-ability of PC games, the only thing really holding anyone from just using a PC in their living room becomes 8-10 games over the spam of a consoles life.
I was looking at the poll. (Of which PC is winning I might add)Thread just says: Next Gen Consoles: PS4 vs XBone on my screen!