The Last of Us

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,495
120,672
You figured me out. I am Ossoi.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Dr.Retarded

<Silver Donator>
12,044
27,478
I have actually not yet seen every episode of Mr. Show, tho I've seen probably at least half of them. This sketch is new to me.

My favorite episode is the Coupon: the Movie episode.
Dude watch them all there literally the best. I used to record them on VHS when they would pop up at midnight on HBO back when I was in the high school. Such a wonderful show, and I guess that's why it's called...

Mr.Show.....
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234
Dude watch them all there literally the best. I used to record them on VHS when they would pop up at midnight on HBO back when I was in the high school. Such a wonderful show, and I guess that's why it's called...

Mr.Show.....
I have every episode downloaded. It's one of those shows where I need to be in the right headspace. And I don't get high that often anymore lol. Started dabbling in psychedelics again lately tho from time to time, maybe I'll turn on a playlist of all of them for my next DOC trip (which likely won't be for a few weeks because oof is that stuff rough on the body).
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Dr.Retarded

<Silver Donator>
12,044
27,478
I have every episode downloaded. It's one of those shows where I need to be in the right headspace. And I don't get high that often anymore lol. Started dabbling in psychedelics again lately tho from time to time, maybe I'll turn on a playlist of all of them for my next DOC trip (which likely won't be for a few weeks because oof is that stuff rough on the body).


I guess I find it fascinating because Bob ended up becoming such a huge hit and David Cross is still in the mix, but hasn't seen near the success as his cohort.

I guess this biggest thing was arrested development which I never really watched but I know he's in there.
 

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234


I guess I find it fascinating because Bob ended up becoming such a huge hit and David Cross is still in the mix, but hasn't seen near the success as his cohort.

I guess this biggest thing was arrested development which I never really watched but I know he's in there.

David could be a lot more famous if he wanted to, but I think he likes just sort of taking it easy and being only modestly rich for an actor. Bob seems to have a lot more interest in ACTING in general instead of just being funny, if that makes sense.

Have you seen the film Nobody starring Bob Odenkirk yet? It's sort of like Bob playing a John Wick type. Which now that I type that it might sound like a lame concept but damn was it a good movie!
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Dr.Retarded

<Silver Donator>
12,044
27,478
David could be a lot more famous if he wanted to, but I think he likes just sort of taking it easy and being only modestly rich for an actor. Bob seems to have a lot more interest in ACTING in general instead of just being funny, if that makes sense.

Have you seen the film Nobody starring Bob Odenkirk yet? It's sort of like Bob playing a John Wick type. Which now that I type that it might sound like a lame concept but damn was it a good movie!
I thought about watching it but I saw the trailer and I'm just kind of ehhhhh. I think is I've gotten older I just don't care for movies like that. I watched the first John wick movie but I have no earthly desire to watch the other four or five or whatever the hell.

It really is the bread and circus deal. I know that might be hypocritical because I'm sitting here posting s*** about Mr show, but that was great comedy back in the day. If you watch all of their seasons it was very clever and fun, and exactly what stretch comedy should be...
 

Asshat wormie

2023 Asshat Award Winner
<Gold Donor>
16,820
30,968
During the season 2 renewal announcement the showrunners confirmed season 2 will cover TLOU2 and also more or less said it will be split into 2 seasons. So thats 3-4 years now of real time the show will run for, which also means if they make a TLOU3 in that time frame there could be more.
So what you are saying is that there is only one season of this show? I am ok with that.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 2 users

Caeden

Golden Baronet of the Realm
7,579
12,532
A degenerate piece of shit who studied other degenerate pieces of shit and presented empirical data about them. Being a degenerate doesn't automatically make you wrong, especially if you're studying other degenerates, no?

FoH: "Pharmakos I don't think degenerate women like you're talking about exist"
Pharm: "pretty sure I could cite Kinsey and show that they do"
FoH: "well degenerate pieces of shit don't count"
Pharm: *thinking to himself* no fucking wonder they don't think women with alternate sex tastes exist. Until you mention specific degenerates, they literally just bury their heads in the sand and pretend that degenerate people don't exist. Damn.
Sophistry. I can't even really follow your argument.

I read a little back on the page, but the gist seemed to be the local anecdotal evidence that women are as disgusted as hetero men are at seeing men make out ergo the women have low sex drive? The follow-up is that Kinsey, who was a known degenerate, produced data that supported his own personal "desires" that there are women into guys fucking guys. Its well known that a almost all of Kinsey's data has serious questions because most think now he used science to justify acting out his own fantasies and degeneracy. That calls into question his data and results since they would be extremely biased to get what he wants. Its ultimately the current problem with the grant system.
 

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234
Sophistry. I can't even really follow your argument.

I read a little back on the page, but the gist seemed to be the local anecdotal evidence that women are as disgusted as hetero men are at seeing men make out ergo the women have low sex drive? The follow-up is that Kinsey, who was a known degenerate, produced data that supported his own personal "desires" that there are women into guys fucking guys. Its well known that a almost all of Kinsey's data has serious questions because most think now he used science to justify acting out his own fantasies and degeneracy. That calls into question his data and results since they would be extremely biased to get what he wants. Its ultimately the current problem with the grant system.
I never said "women into guys fucking guys." They typically don't go that far with it. It's just the soft intimate stuff that they usually like. Tho older manly men like in the episode isn't necessarily what they like seeing, I'll admit, but there certainly is a large portion of the female population that's into watching attractive men softly kiss each other or snuggle or etc
 
  • 1Garbage
  • 1Dislike
Reactions: 1 users

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,495
120,672
but there certainly is a large portion of the female population that's into watching attractive men softly kiss each other or snuggle or etc
And you have actual data to support this? Large portion is sorta a big number.
 

Oldbased

> Than U
28,424
67,388
I wouldn't say I was disgusted, that wasn't my point. My point is literally every movie and series has to throw in some epic gaylove as a focal point when in reality it isn't as common as that. When gay love couples>normal couples in every show on TV then ya, it is a valid complaint. It's old and this isn't a story about gay fungus. Just like the other examples and series, there is no need for it at all. They have LGBT@#$#@234 categories on all streaming services now. If I wanted to watch gay fungus, I would choose that genre.
 

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234
And you have actual data to support this? Large portion is sorta a big number.
When looking for data I actually proved myself wrong, but not in the way you might think -- I just found many sources saying women prefer gay male porn, not just softcore homoerotic stuff
















For those that might object to any of these sources, here's the fucking DAILY BEAST writing about it. Surely most of the people here think they're reputable?



This is interesting: More than half of women who watch male gay porn imagine themselves as MEN during erotic sexual fantasies 'to feel less guilty', scientist reveals


Enough?
 
  • 3Dislike
  • 1Garbage
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 5 users

Caeden

Golden Baronet of the Realm
7,579
12,532
Lol. No. I don’t believe a single fucking one of those links. Sorry. Even anecdotally, in my 25ish women sexual partners exactly two have been into watching any porn. And both absolutely detested anything resembling gay porn. One wanted softcore-ish straight shit. The other wanted it to be hard hardcore.

My guess is, given the leftist leaning, those studies are suffering from some serious selection bias. Even the daily beast was a study on lesbian which is guaranteed less than 5% of women. What? 4% of adults are gay/bi? Half that to be generous despite stats saying the majority of gay people are dudes into cock, so you’re talking 2% of women. And what fraction of carpet munchers like gay porn? It’s not 50%. So now we might be talking fractions of a percent.

Even the daily mail article self selects. 50% of women who watch gay porn imagine as the guy? The article specifically says it self selected for women who watch gay porn.

This proves jack and shit. FYI. Stats seem to indicate 10% of total women watch porn. This is using small samples to make egregious generalizations to a population.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234
Lol. No. I don’t believe a single fucking one of those links. Sorry. Even anecdotally, in my 25ish women sexual partners exactly two have been into watching any porn. And both absolutely detested anything resembling gay porn. One wanted softcore-ish straight shit. The other wanted it to be hard hardcore.

My guess is, given the leftist leaning, those studies are suffering from some serious selection bias. Even the daily beast was a study on lesbian which is guaranteed less than 5% of women. What? 4% of adults are gay/bi? Half that to be generous despite stats saying the majority of gay people are dudes into cock, so you’re talking 2% of women. And what fraction of carpet munchers like gay porn? It’s not 50%. So now we might be talking fractions of a percent.

Even the daily mail article self selects. 50% of women who watch gay porn imagine as the guy? The article specifically says it self selected for women who watch gay porn.

This proves jack and shit. FYI. Stats seem to indicate 10% of total women watch porn. This is using small samples to make egregious generalizations to a population.
Perhaps it says more about your preferences in women? Or perhaps they were embarrassed and lied? I had a girlfriend once that claimed she had never masturbated in her life. She definitely had. She just was bashful. Women are weird. Anonymous polls are much more believable than anecdotal evidence from men.
 

Caeden

Golden Baronet of the Realm
7,579
12,532
Perhaps it says more about your preferences in women? Or perhaps they were embarrassed and lied? I had a girlfriend once that claimed she had never masturbated in her life. She definitely had. She just was bashful. Women are weird. Anonymous polls are much more believable than anecdotal evidence from men.
That’s literally only my first paragraph. The rest of my argument is from easy to find stats and applying those stats plus reading your links to show bias. Taking 2% of women as a realistic measure and you can google to find it’s true or 10% of women, at most in 25 women I would find 2.5 women into porn AT ALL. The other link says 40%. So that would mean about 6-8 women lied for my anecdote. Even then you have to begin to breakdown 10-40% of the female population further to get to those into men fucking men. That was my point. Tell me whwre this large portion of women into tender fags is? None of the anonymous shit certainly support “large portion.”


 

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234
That’s literally only my first paragraph. The rest of my argument is from easy to find stats and applying those stats plus reading your links to show bias. Taking 2% of women as a realistic measure and you can google to find it’s true or 10% of women, at most in 25 women I would find 2.5 women into porn AT ALL. The other link says 40%. So that would mean about 6-8 women lied for my anecdote. Even then you have to begin to breakdown 10-40% of the female population further to get to those into men fucking men. That was my point. Tell me whwre this large portion of women into tender fags is? None of the anonymous shit certainly support “large portion.”


10% or 40% is such a wide variance that I'm not inclined to believe the stats. Perhaps the true number is somewhere in that range but there's obviously something fucky in your numbers.

And to me, 40% IS a large portion even if it's not a majority.
 

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234
Also 40% of 25 women would be 10. Not 6-8. That math is pretty easy come on bro.