The Last of Us

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,495
120,672
When looking for data I actually proved myself wrong, but not in the way you might think -- I just found many sources saying women prefer gay male porn, not just softcore homoerotic stuff
















For those that might object to any of these sources, here's the fucking DAILY BEAST writing about it. Surely most of the people here think they're reputable?



This is interesting: More than half of women who watch male gay porn imagine themselves as MEN during erotic sexual fantasies 'to feel less guilty', scientist reveals


Enough?
So wait. Maybe we don't speak the same language. When I say data to support a position, it's actual statistical research that's peer reviewed and has been replicated.

You posted shit like:
advocate.com
pride.com
dailybeast.com
outfront.com
pinknews.com

As data sources.

Season 2 Lol GIF by Insecure on HBO
 
  • 2Worf
Reactions: 1 users

Caeden

Golden Baronet of the Realm
7,579
12,532
Also 40% of 25 women would be 10. Not 6-8. That math is pretty easy come on bro.
The only thing fucky is your reading comprehension. 2+8 is 10 dumbfuck.

11% came from the IFR. 40% from the Pew survey with a massive fudge factor layered on it. Fairly obvious you either can not follow arguments or understand statistics. Those are just fucking bounds.

But as my last point, the argument was a large portion of women SPECIFICALLY LIKE WATCHING MEN TENDERLY FUCKING MEN PORN. The 40% is women who watch ANY TYPE OF PORN. Jesus H Christ. This is not a hard concept. A vast majority of men watch porn. That doesn’t mean a vast majority fucking watch cuck porn.

I’m out. I deal enough with stupidity out of engineers and scientists I respect in person to argue on a Saturday about a stupid fucking show with math illiterates.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234
So wait. Maybe we don't speak the same language. When I say data to support a position, it's actual statistical research that's peer reviewed and has been replicated.

You posted shit like:
advocate.com
pride.com
dailybeast.com
outfront.com
pinknews.com

As data sources.

Season 2 Lol GIF by Insecure on HBO
The 40% figure supports my assertion that "a sizeable portion of viewers actually are into that shit" tho. Hollywood is perfectly alright catering to a sizeable minority from time to time. Y'all helped me prove my point. Thank you.
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,495
120,672
Your 40% figure supports my assertion that "a sizeable portion of viewers actually are into that shit" tho. Hollywood is perfectly alright catering to a sizeable minority from time to time. You helped me prove my point. Thank you.
My 40% ??
 

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234
My 40% ??
Edited. You morons all blur together for me.

"The 40% figure supports my assertion that "a sizeable portion of viewers actually are into that shit" tho. Hollywood is perfectly alright catering to a sizeable minority from time to time. Y'all helped me prove my point. Thank you."
 

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234
You quote gay magazines as support for your gay position but we are morons?
I was being lazy. I could have found some peer reviewed journal articles from Sci Hub tho. But if I did that you guys would find a way to object by saying the journal is too small to be reputable or etc. I know your type. Not generally worth the effort going that far. Especially when y'all come up with figures yourself that literally support my claim. Why would I bother finding research when Caeden proved my point for me?

And yes not following this logic genuinely does make you a moron, even tho my reputation is making you emotionally feel like it must be me that's wrong. Get over yourself and get over me and judge the data and message rather than the source.
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,495
120,672
I was being lazy. I could have found some peer reviewed journal articles from Sci Hub tho. But if I did that you guys would find a way to object by saying the journal is too small to be reputable or etc. I know your type. Not generally worth the effort going that far. Especially when y'all come up with figures yourself that literally support my claim. Why would I bother finding research when Caeden proved my point for me?

And yes not following this logic genuinely does make you a moron, even tho my reputation is making you emotionally feel like it must be me that's wrong. Get over yourself and get over me and judge the data and message rather than the source.

"I was being lazy. I could have found some peer reviewed journal articles from Sci Hub tho." And yet you didn't. You chose gay magazines instead.

"you guys would find a way to object by saying the journal is too small to be reputable or etc." So we would attack the credibility of a peer reviews journal but you figured using gay magazines would be the better solution?

"And yes not following this logic genuinely does make you a moron" - Oh, we follow your "logic" friendo

"my reputation is making you emotionally feel like it must be me that's wrong" - I didnt even know who the fuck you were until you began this splurgfest of shitty posting across a half dozen or more threads two days ago.

"et over yourself and get over me and judge the data and message rather than the source." - I did judge the data. You sourced it from gay magazines. Having the advocate.com write that straight women love seeing gay men suck cock isnt the mic drop you apparently think it is.
 

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,234
"I was being lazy. I could have found some peer reviewed journal articles from Sci Hub tho." And yet you didn't. You chose gay magazines instead.

"you guys would find a way to object by saying the journal is too small to be reputable or etc." So we would attack the credibility of a peer reviews journal but you figured using gay magazines would be the better solution?

"And yes not following this logic genuinely does make you a moron" - Oh, we follow your "logic" friendo

"my reputation is making you emotionally feel like it must be me that's wrong" - I didnt even know who the fuck you were until you began this splurgfest of shitty posting across a half dozen or more threads two days ago.

"et over yourself and get over me and judge the data and message rather than the source." - I did judge the data. You sourced it from gay magazines. Having the advocate.com write that straight women love seeing gay men suck cock isnt the mic drop you apparently think it is.
Not all of the magazines were gay magazines. Many were reputable news sources. You're grasping at straws. And contributing to the shitting up of this thread. Have a good day.
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,495
120,672
This thread may now return to its regularly schedule bitching about the gay episode for the next 24-hours. Peace has been restored. No need to thank me.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

TomServo

<Bronze Donator>
6,953
9,828
This thread may now return to its regularly schedule bitching about the gay episode for the next 24-hours. Peace has been restored. No need to thank me.
Can we just ban this dumb faggot? It's like he ossoi and phisey take turns.
 
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users

Xevy

Log Wizard
8,885
4,105
I saw the post with 30 article links and for a second I think somehow Lithose got un-ignored and raised from the dead.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,737
52,284
I saw the post with 30 article links and for a second I think somehow Lithose got un-ignored and raised from the dead.
What kind of pussy felt the need to put Lithose on ignore?
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 2 users