Yea but the point is, how do you design your pre-positioned launch vehicle that is intended to stay there for years if there are random storms that will knock it over? Why not either design it to survive any possible storm or have it stay in orbit and deploy as needed? Either of these would work and close the plot hole, but then you'd need some other reason for characters to do what they do.That big storm didn't necessarily pass over the other MAV. It was just in his way to getting to it.
I don't understand the complaint. It wasn't / isn't designed so that a random storm can knock it over. They obviously design it for certain tolerances that are also stated in the movie. They know the storm is way out of those tolerances, they know the maximum angle the MTV can tilt, etc...Where is the plothole? Other than what he said about the storm not being feasible at all. But not designing the MAV to withstand anything ever checks out. Survive any possible storm, really?Yea but the point is, how do you design your pre-positioned launch vehicle that is intended to stay there for years if there are random storms that will knock it over? Why not either design it to survive any possible storm or have it stay in orbit and deploy as needed? Either of these would work and close the plot hole, but then you'd need some other reason for characters to do what they do.
Having intelligent reasons that your characters do what they do (and thereby letting your characters be smart, and not having to blunder into adversity to make a plot arc) is a hallmark of good writing.
All it would need is some extensible leg supports and wind couldn't possibly blow it over. We're not talking about serious redesign here.I don't understand the complaint. It wasn't / isn't designed so that a random storm can knock it over. They obviously design it for certain tolerances that are also stated in the movie. They know the storm is way out of those tolerances, they know the maximum angle the MTV can tilt, etc...Where is the plothole? Other than what he said about the storm not being feasible at all. But not designing the MAV to withstand anything ever checks out. Survive any possible storm, really?
It cost what, $10,000 per pound of payload just to get something in orbit? When they were building the MTV they didn't have an unlimited budget, so basically they had to say "Our budget allows for us to build an MTV that can withstand a storm with winds up to 150kph, what are the chances that in the 4 years the MTV is there charging up it gets hit by a storm larger than that?" and so long as that chance was within the mission risk tolerances that is was okay. We can also infer that those risk tolerances were obscenely low when, with Mark's life in the balance, they almost didn't attempt to resupply him because the emergency launch had a 2.5% chance of failure.All it would need is some extensible leg supports and wind couldn't possibly blow it over. We're not talking about serious redesign here.
And the original complaint was if the storms are so common that one occurs during their original 30 day mission, how do they just plan on leaving the other one out there for years? Surely another storm will come along before Ares IV shows up.
It cost what, $10,000 per pound of payload just to get something in orbit? When they were building the MTV they didn't have an unlimited budget, so basically they had to say "Our budget allows for us to build an MTV that can withstand a storm with winds up to 150kph, what are the chances that in the 4 years the MTV is there charging up it gets hit by a storm larger than that?" and so long as that chance was within the mission risk tolerances that is was okay. We can also infer that those risk tolerances were obscenely low when, with Mark's life in the balance, they almost didn't attempt to resupply him because the emergency launch had a 2.5% chance of failure.
Well, it used the atmosphere to generate hydrazine or something, so it would have had to have been on the ground the entire time.Yea but the point is, how do you design your pre-positioned launch vehicle that is intended to stay there for years if there are random storms that will knock it over? Why not either design it to survive any possible storm or have it stay in orbit and deploy as needed? Either of these would work and close the plot hole, but then you'd need some other reason for characters to do what they do.
Having intelligent reasons that your characters do what they do (and thereby letting your characters be smart, and not having to blunder into adversity to make a plot arc) is a hallmark of good writing.
What movie doesn't have a plot hole?Its not like it ruins anything, it's just a bit of a plot hole. [Reason to leave watney on Mars] whatever that reason is, its fine. Just should have come up with something better
It's not the force, it's the fact that the dust would trash everything. It's super fine so it clogs everything, is made of metals, radioactive charged particles, all sorts of shit. At least, that's what they used to think, I'm not sure what the current science is.The dust storm is a known plot hole. An extreme dust storm on Mars supposedly has the force of a light breeze on your face. What he could have done is use lightning instead. There are many examples of lightning strikes happening and a dust storm with raging lightning is probably more realistic. Still for a book so scientifically accurate based on the knowledge of one person I can give him a pass on the dust storm. I didn't know about the soil issues.
Uhh, yea that's exactly what it is in the movie though, the wind literally knocking the spaceship over.It's not the force, it's the fact that the dust would trash everything. It's super fine so it clogs everything, is made of metals, radioactive charged particles, all sorts of shit. At least, that's what they used to think, I'm not sure what the current science is.
Thanks for commenting on the plot details of a movie you clearly have not seen. The wind was the issue, as if it pushed the rocket over 13 degrees it would not be able to take off.It's not the force, it's the fact that the dust would trash everything. It's super fine so it clogs everything, is made of metals, radioactive charged particles, all sorts of shit. At least, that's what they used to think, I'm not sure what the current science is.