I'm pretty sure I've rehashed this many times in this thread, but here we go again.
You're right, not even a clear picture or video is going to convince me these days, because it is STILL much more likely that said proof is either not really what it appears to be (Black Knight satellite being a fucking blanket, anyone?) or a straight up fake than it is that actual aliens are somehow here and enjoy buzzing aircraft but otherwise remaining unseen. Pick anywhere on the internet, and you'll find people that are more than willing to troll the shit out of people for even a little bit of attention. Combine that with another subset of the population that wants to believe so badly, and here we are.
What would it take to convince me? I'm honestly not sure anymore. Even seeing something with my own eyes would have to be so clear and incapable of being faked, because my first thought would be to wonder if I were on drugs somehow. I'd definitely need a substantial number of other people seeing the same thing. Obviously there is a point where I'd believe something right in front of me, but it would not be glimpsing something racing across the sky, no matter how clear. I suppose I would believe it if an actual alien ship appeared somewhere and literal aliens stepped out of it, and hundreds/thousands of cell phone videos caught it...but I'd need to see it coming down all the way, and close ups of the ship and aliens to ensure they weren't fakes as well. And even then I'd probably want to see it personally too. Give me Independence Day ships hovering over major cities, and I'll come back here and say how wrong I was.
Pretty extreme requirements for proof? Sure, but why shouldn't they be? You're essentially asking me to take other people's word for it, and making me assume that people aren't inherently flawed, make mistakes, and sometimes outright duplicitous. Remember, it would still be easier for you to find one specific grain of sand on this planet than it would be to find one particular planet in the known universe. By orders of magnitude. And that's not even taking into account how long it would take to search the universe vs. the fraction of time that life has been on this planet. You can handwave away impossibilities like that with "advanced tech we have no comprehension of" but if I try to handwave it away by saying people are stupid/shitty, I'm the one that is in a logic trap.
Yeah, ok.
You're right, not even a clear picture or video is going to convince me these days, because it is STILL much more likely that said proof is either not really what it appears to be (Black Knight satellite being a fucking blanket, anyone?) or a straight up fake than it is that actual aliens are somehow here and enjoy buzzing aircraft but otherwise remaining unseen. Pick anywhere on the internet, and you'll find people that are more than willing to troll the shit out of people for even a little bit of attention. Combine that with another subset of the population that wants to believe so badly, and here we are.
What would it take to convince me? I'm honestly not sure anymore. Even seeing something with my own eyes would have to be so clear and incapable of being faked, because my first thought would be to wonder if I were on drugs somehow. I'd definitely need a substantial number of other people seeing the same thing. Obviously there is a point where I'd believe something right in front of me, but it would not be glimpsing something racing across the sky, no matter how clear. I suppose I would believe it if an actual alien ship appeared somewhere and literal aliens stepped out of it, and hundreds/thousands of cell phone videos caught it...but I'd need to see it coming down all the way, and close ups of the ship and aliens to ensure they weren't fakes as well. And even then I'd probably want to see it personally too. Give me Independence Day ships hovering over major cities, and I'll come back here and say how wrong I was.
Pretty extreme requirements for proof? Sure, but why shouldn't they be? You're essentially asking me to take other people's word for it, and making me assume that people aren't inherently flawed, make mistakes, and sometimes outright duplicitous. Remember, it would still be easier for you to find one specific grain of sand on this planet than it would be to find one particular planet in the known universe. By orders of magnitude. And that's not even taking into account how long it would take to search the universe vs. the fraction of time that life has been on this planet. You can handwave away impossibilities like that with "advanced tech we have no comprehension of" but if I try to handwave it away by saying people are stupid/shitty, I'm the one that is in a logic trap.
Yeah, ok.
- 1