i dont think there is some collaborated coverup. i think its nobody wants to be THAT GUY who bucks the narrative by claiming the pyramids/sphynx/peru megaliths are near the same age as gobekli tepe and part of a very ancient global trade network. first thing that happens, you lose all credibility, then you lose funding. then you go to work for starbucks.
exactly, its an unfeasible amount of time for just one cut block. then you have no delivery system. no rednecks to lever a block a hundred miles from the quarry.
you're just making up scenarios too. the number of guys make no difference. im sure it took a lot of guys, but i'm also sure there was a lot of other work to be done. there was also a lot of other structures all built in the same manner that required the same attention and all have been credited to one or two rulers. there simply isnt a feasible amount of time to achieve these things in the short time they were given to have happened. keep in mind. the same people saying these things. also claim there were NO slaves building them. all paid contractors.According to who? You? If you're an emperor and you have a few thousand people who have to do what you say then maybe it is a feasible amount of time. Like I said, no one does manual labor anymore so we forget how much a bunch of guys with hand tools can accomplish. Marching Roman Legions used to build camps with trenches and fences/walls around them while they were marching sometimes every night and that included harvesting wood from the forest, then they would just leave them behind. Some of the nicer ones were actually taken over once the Romans left and became towns. When you have 3000 motivated guys with hand tools they can do a whole lot of work even if each guy isn't doing much compared to one modern guy driving an excavator.
According to who? You? If you're an emperor and you have a few thousand people who have to do what you say then maybe it is a feasible amount of time. Like I said, no one does manual labor anymore so we forget how much a bunch of guys with hand tools can accomplish. Marching Roman Legions used to build camps with trenches and fences/walls around them while they were marching sometimes every night and that included harvesting wood from the forest, then they would just leave them behind. Some of the nicer ones were actually taken over once the Romans left and became towns. When you have 3000 motivated guys with hand tools they can do a whole lot of work even if each guy isn't doing much compared to one modern guy driving an excavator.
i dont think its unreasonable to scale back the timelines on these ancient megalithic structures. whats 1000, 2000, 4000, 10000, 20000+ years in the past when you still have the same basic problems of who, how and why they were built. in fact, the further back they go the more plausible some of these structures can become. then you can say, well 10k years ago they had woolly mammoths moving these things and they had a lot more time to do it. the Younger Dryas Event occurs and then construction abruptly stops due to massive extinction of megafauna and ancient peoples. lots of lost knowledge. by making these things only a few hundred years ago like say the Peruvian megaliths just makes no goddamned sense. there is a VERY clear distinction to the manner of construction.
look at this example.
this is the third pyramid in egypt. (menkaure)
roughly 4000 years old according to the narrative
then you have the megaliths in Peru
around 500 years old according to narrative. they look the same
there really needs to be a break in the hivemind and admit. yes, people have been awesome and a lot earlier than we previously imagined. Gobekli Tepe has already set the precedent.
i mean its being covered up, i dont deny that. i'm just saying there isnt some cabal of mustache twirling archaeologists deciding that nothing is older than 4500 years old becase The Vatican is paying them. i just think its like the global warming cult, nobody wants to break ranks and admit we are in a natural warming trend that humans have no control over.
Like saying a television is impossible because you have no idea how transistors or diodes work. There's no real conspiracy, and it's not like there aren't several ideas of "how" something was made, just that there's no solid proof on any one thing for objects made so long ago that have endured so much weathering as to remove that evidence.
yet nobody can duplicate it when challenged using the same tools. years ago they decided that they knew how Stonehenge was built. they decided to put their theory to the test. they used a smaller stone and still couldnt fucking do it. same shit in Costa RIca
