All of whom lost in the Columbia University review board on the case. ALL their cases were thrown out AND it was proven that the other two alleged victims MADE UP THEIR CHARGES at the behest of a mutual friend of Sulkowitz and theirs.
Her "annotations" are just more DEMONSTRABLY FRAUDULENT HORSESHIT and LIES, as proven by the COURT RECORDS of the facebook conversations, with time stamps, filed by Nungesser in his lawsuit against Columbia University.
You can disagree with it all you want, but you're fucking wrong, especially when the burden of proof is so low, and FOUR separate accusers accounts are ALL found to be incapable of meeting that burden of proof.
I never laughed at you dude... And I never pretended to know it all. Hell, before today I thought only someone who had been traumatically raped would lug around a mattress for a year to make a statement about it. I just took the guy's guilt at face value. Turns out I may have been incorrect.
Truth is not a subjective quantity you disingenuous cock sucking mouth breather. She wasn't raped, therefore she can't assume he's guilty when she made the whole fucking thing up, and still maintain a position of intellectual honesty. She is a liar and a fraud.
No, it's not. Not if you look at women the same way you do as men. That's the difference--most of us here aren't sexist. We see women capable of the same deviancy and manipulation that men are. You do not; you see them as incapable of such things. And thus you believe it's more logical that she was raped and there simply wasn't enough proof. You are essentially the reason why feminists believe that only between 2-8% of rape accusations are fraud, while counting the 70+% that fall into "not enough evidence to prosecute" are automatically counted as a failure to catch a rapist. In reality, that 70% figure could contain lying women (For any number of reasons) or real victims that were raped and they lacked evidence. But for people that believe women are incapable of being mistaken, or lying? It's just impossible to fathom that.
Post you quoted Tad was highlighting the mattress girl. The whole subject line was not just about the study. Also, non-rape? Can be emotionally traumatic for a young person--break ups are never easy, even for emotionally stable and mature adults. Those feelings in a young person, struggling with being away from home for the first time? Can be traumatic to the extreme. Boys in this range off themselves at what? Four or five times the rate of women? Maybe a bunch of those boys are dealing with trauma by swallowing a gun barrel, while women deal with it by expressing it openly. Which maybe, just maybe, because relationship endings are so traumatic--those expressions end up extremely distorted. I mean, why discount that distortion happens in this way?
I was going to say something similar to this in regards to how both sexes handle rejection as well. Plenty of men end up either killing the person rejecting them, or themselves, as a result of being inculturated in a society that eschews male emotions and emphasizes male aggression, and the reverse is very likely that many women, inculturated in a society that condones false rape charges as perfectly acceptable, probably handle rejection in that way as a result.