This is what people aren't getting. All of this stuff was coming out about CDPR before the Witcher 4 trailer. If someone was unfamiliar with it, I can see why they'd think the trailer is mostly fine and point out things like "Geralt looked bad in the original Witcher 3 trailer" and so on. What's been happening at the company since late 2018 I believe is the real red flag, not the trailer. Ciri is kinda ugly now though lol.
Even the CDPR lead was trying to dismiss/gaslight people over the DEI shit that is literally on their own website and something he himself promotes.
Where there's smoke, there's fire, and where there are rainbow flags, there are fags.
See, a create your own Witcher game where you can pick either gender and both are voice acted like Mass effect would be great. Maybe you're running around with Ciri and training with her and Geralt or something. Whatever, it's just nice to have the option.
Especially when you have a game that's so dialogue heavy, and choosing how you go through various conversations. It's okay though because now you're a strong woman, and you will make the transition into this character, and you better like, or else you get the nine iron.
It would have been a perfect setup to let you choose a Witcher school that would affect your stats, fighting style, and alliances/rivalries. I think the School of the Cat even trained female witchers, so
there you go, mythical modern audience and consoomers. The possiblities this would allow are endless just from a politicking standpoint and how the story could evolve like a true role-playing game.
For role playing games specifically, 99% of men are going to have a much easier time playing the role of a male character, especially a pre-determined one like Geralt, and that will always be the main demographic no matter how many chicks pick up pokemon go or peggle to fluff the numbers.
Then when you consider how much the technology to allow even more customization and player choice has only expanded exponentially, these developers insistence to railroad players on their C-movie level storylines is a difficult trend to ignore. Then when they
do give the player a choice, they'd rather give them top scars and blue hair ideology lectures like in Failguard.
Kind of how assassins creed: odyssey worked. You weren't shoe horned into playing the bull dyke like you were in Valhalla.
Valhalla was the last game I ever play from that shit company. I see they carried the bull dyke playstyle over into star wars. No thanks. Let me rescue a hot space princess and play with her titties. No bull dykes.
That's the perfect example of an unwarranted and illogical reversal. I only played a bit of Oddysey for free, but I do know that you can go around killing civilians and the game doesn't give a shit. Somehow in the game about
fucking vikings, nope, their dumbshit animus blue screens over a
fucking viking killing civilians. That alone is unforgiveable.
Dunno if it was linked yet or not lol.
Some of them? Could he not stretch the meaning of the word as hard as his spread asshole for a second and try to understand that Henry Cavil left explicitly because they were taking gigantic shits on the lore and that they love and respect nothing but their own egos?
Also, if this isn't (another)
red rainbow flag too big to ignore, then I don't know what to say.