Bullshit. They took the character from being able to withstand multi nuclear bomb blasts, to making him weaker than Loki. I can't name a more drastic power change in any of the other movies (unless you are counting Mandarin). Whenever Thor and the Destroyer fought in the comics, it could have gone two or three issues non-stop. Not one hit.
Hulk Buster armor actually beating the Hulk is pretty significant. Anything stopping the Hulk actually. But as everyone else says... MCU != Marvel Comics. It's just like the stupid Spider-Man argument from the Civil War thread. It's like going to see Transformers 4 and complaining that they got Galvatron's motivation wrong. It's inspired by the character but it sure as shit isn't the same. Not to mention it falls into the MCU cursed-realm of being a villain, from which none but Loki have escaped.
Did the Hulkbuster one shot Hulk?
No, it's not. Spider Man had just gained his powers and didn't know how to use them. Forget the comics, in the movie, it's established by Odin that the Destroyer was forged to be his perfect weapon, just like Mjolnir. The movie wasn't even continuous with itself.
Explain how the Destroyer is forged from the same unbreakable metal as Mjolnir, yet Thor can one shot it? This was established in the comics, and in the movie. It is composed of metal denser than Vibranium, give me a break.
Well. In the movie (you can see it in all the scenes where Destroyer opens its eye-laser holes) the armor surrounding the spirit inhabiting the Destroyer is pretty thin. Mjolnir is a solid block of of said metal, and much smaller. At the speeds being traveled, the force presented by the small impact area that Mjolnir makes on the Destroyer means that the force transition from momentum as it collides with a small part of the Destroyer is a -huge- differential in force over a small area. Hence him being "one shot."
Vibranium/Uru/Admantium getting destroyed in one hit, by non cosmic-powered beings? No it doesn't.
Mostly because for whatever reason she really was not liking the role and the movie and was becoming very difficult to work with in regards to these films. Better to just let her go.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE SPIDERMAN COULD SOLO EVERYONE IN CIVIL WAR REEEEEEEEEEEEEE NORMIES RUINED HIM
I don't dislike Natalie Portman. I didn't really even dislike her character. But I definitely think she was the weakest part of Thor 2 and ended up dragging the movie down. It really felt like the writers had no idea what to do with her character, resulting in a plot that felt disjointed in a lot of places. I'm hoping Marvel is starting to move in a direction where they don't feel the need to force a romance in every one of their movies.
