Thor: The Dark World.

The Ancient_sl

shitlord
7,386
16
Honestly Kat Dennings has nothing on Natalie Portman or the chick who plays Sif attractiveness wise. There is just something about her that resonates with the geek fan base.

And she has huge fucking tits.
 

Wuyley_sl

shitlord
1,443
13
Just saw this tonight and it was hilarious! Even during the part for the ladies where Thor is "washing himself" the drunk guy behind me goes, "Jesus Christ Chris, it's ok if you skip a day at the gym." That made everyone laugh.

Overall not my favorite superhero movie but worth the $8.
 

Wuyley_sl

shitlord
1,443
13
Just saw this tonight and it was hilarious! Even during the part for the ladies where Thor is "washing himself" the drunk guy behind me goes, "Jesus Christ Chris, it's ok if you skip a day at the gym." That made everyone laugh.

Overall not my favorite superhero movie but worth the $8.
 

PatrickStar

Trakanon Raider
1,529
558
I left the movie thinking, "the woman that played Sif needs to be in more movies. And by movies I mean pornos."
 

spronk

FPS noob
22,706
25,842
Bluray rips are out, good fun watch and the extras have 6 deleted scenes, a short gag reel, and some boring interviews and stuff. thought the villain (the drow) was boring and cardboard cutout shitty, but everything else was good. looking forward to next avengers, was pretty disappointed with tdkr, iron man 3 and superman.

I believe a short 14 minute "documentary" about the character ben kingsley played in IM3 is included, "all hail the king", haven't watched it yet but seems kinda weird to toss an iron man 3 story into the thor dvd
 

Nester

Vyemm Raider
4,931
3,132
Hail to the king was not very good, Hammer was the only saving grace. IM3 and Thor2 were let downs imo. I really thought the dark elves where pretty hollow.
 

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
this movie would've been so much better without Natalie Portman and replaced her with that hot viking chick.
 

spronk

FPS noob
22,706
25,842
this movie would've been so much better without Natalie Portman and replaced her with that hot viking chick.
its sorta cliche but it woulda been better if the shit inside natpo twisted her and then let her out to play as a crazy psycho. instead we just got this boring thing where it lashed out every time someone came near, and then natalie fainted. Woulda been cool to see evil Natalie hamming it up, trying to seduce Loki, telling the drow to fuck himself and she is the new queen of blades, twisting Thor's mind, whatever.

Instead we just saw natalies confused face the entire movie, and she looks ugly in that pout

video-undefined-18EB4F8E00000578-194_636x358.jpg
 

Gorillaz_sl

shitlord
203
0
Yeah big problem with this movie and honestly the Marvel movies in general, is the villains SUCK.

I'm beginning to think the only reason I really liked the Avengers was because I like Loki.
 

Mist

Eeyore Enthusiast
<Gold Donor>
30,480
22,330
The villains have been pretty bad because they're so disposable, though I did like the villain in IM3.
 

Jarnin_sl

shitlord
351
0
The villains have been pretty bad because they're so disposable, though I did like the villain in IM3.
^ this. Stane, Schmidt, Killian, and Malekith were two dimensional characters and got killed off. I don't know if the writers were planning on killing them from the start, so didn't make them interesting characters, or they wrote them as two-dimensional bad guys and decided to whack them when they got to the end of the script. Either way, it was some pretty generic performances/writing. Blonski and Loki hadsomecharacter development, so they lived.

Trevor had character. And character growth. He was interesting, even if it wasn't what a lot of folks wanted. I wouldn't list him as a bad guy though. He's more of a fall guy / patsy type.
 

Nebuchadnezzar

Golden Squire
458
50
It's the same problem as always, they can't touch FF, Spider-man, or X-Men related characters, and those three have like 90% of the good villains in Marvel Comics.