no, it drags on til about episode 7 then picks up the pace but is not good quality writing and ends very unsatisfying. however, if you're some gulag refugee then it will be perfect for you.Been avoiding thread since I gave up after episode 2. Should I bother watching?
Yeah, it was some of the best TV in years. It really slams the accelerator in episode 4 (kinda like S1 did with the ghetto raid) and doesnt let up until the finale credits.Been avoiding thread since I gave up after episode 2. Should I bother watching?
Was the ending in S1 satisfying by comparison?no, it drags on til about episode 7 then picks up the pace but is not good quality writing and ends very unsatisfying. however, if you're some gulag refugee then it will be perfect for you.
far and away, most of the story made sense and the acting was top notch and not overly pretentious in dialogue.Was the ending in S1 satisfying by comparison?
Sorry dude, your opinion was void since that cutler stuff.Yeah, it was some of the best TV in years. It really slams the accelerator in episode 4 (kinda like S1 did with the ghetto raid) and doesnt let up until the finale credits.
This just demonstrates how clueless you are about this stuff.far and away, most of the story made sense and the acting was top notch and not overly pretentious in dialogue.
np, my opinion isnt stellar here either, some non araysar people claimed they liked this season too, though all have said its not even close to being as good as season 1Sorry dude, your opinion was void since that cutler stuff.
Thanks chuk
do i really need to explain why season 2 is being compared to season 1? its because this was season 2 which followed season one. you always compare the previous with current. always.Almost nothing is better than season 1 why the fuck do people keep comparing s2 to s1 in terms of a quality entertainment standard. Yes it has the same name and yes its the same guy behind the scenes but it should stand on its own.
Im not saying NO COMPARISONS LOL, but more in terms of a bench mark. S1 critically acclaimed, then show runners say "but lol next season will have new actors setting and story!".do i really need to explain why season 2 is being compared to season 1? its because this was season 2 which followed season one. you always compare the previous with current. always.
same writer, same premise about detectives solving crimes. Its comparable. The actors, setting and story may be independent of season one, but because its supposed to different, then you can still side by side s1 with s2. Its ridiculous to say comparing s1 to s2 is invalid. Its because of season one that this show ever got a second season. If the pizza man delivered this season's weak sauce story for the first season there would have been no second seasonIm not saying NO COMPARISONS LOL, but more in terms of a bench mark. S1 critically acclaimed, then show runners say "but lol next season will have new actors setting and story!".
Now that s2 is wrapped up and people understand it had literally nothing to do with s1 it should be judged on its own merits.
lol wut?If the pizza man delivered this season's weak sauce story for the first season there would have been no second season
Astro slobs the knob of every halfassed CW and Syfy show there is, then comes all up in threads about actual quality tv shows and acts like he suddenly has a sense of taste.Astro watches CW?
Well, that explains a lot. All CW shows are written for the 13-17 year old demographic, so he can keep up with those kinds of plotsAstro slobs the knob of every halfassed CW and Syfy show there is, then comes all up in threads about actual quality tv shows and acts like he suddenly has a sense of taste.