Lol. You are even more deluded than I thought.
I
study research; I'm not saying I'm a paid professional IN THE FIELD. You are proving you don't understand words and that has been a repeated pattern from you wormie. You even had one of your own pop in this thread to tell you about the actual definitions of atheism / agnosticism because you got locked in a semantic pissing match with me and you were shown to be clueless.
Notice a correlation here of hate and unintelligence? They're definitely bedmates.
Why would I not mean it? I wrote it. I don't know who you're confusing me with here, I used to discuss things in this thread at length, with you and others. But the kid debate made me salty as fuck and less likely to want to have that conversation with you, specifically holding a position for months, quite publicly, only to backtrack on it later. Which whatever, many paths to the right answer and at least you got there, still though quite frustrating for those engaged. Quite interesting topics though, trans issues and surrounding issues, it would be great to be able to ahve a dialogue about that with a trans person, no other way to really get that perspective.
I'm willing to have a dialogue and promised you would get a reasonable dialogue. Again, I tabula rasa'd any strife and negative words we've flung around toward each other. It's all water under the bridge now to me. What were you curious about concerning trans stuff chaos? You said you found it
fascinating?
If you're so intellectual, why don't you go to uni, apply yourself,
Vanessa
?
I'm old, I'm happy exactly where I am, and it takes money (which I don't have) and time (which I have precious little). Plus I've seen enough Milo / Shapiro / Knowles vids to know how liberal those professors are. College isn't JUST about getting a piece of paper; it's networking and making connections which is past my time to "fit in" with college kids and I'm certainly not getting snug with professors which all we'd do is argue about Trump over dinner.
The annoying part is her later denial of a lot of her initial views as she presented them at the time. Most people still don't want to have a good faith argument, sure, but I'm sure plenty of people checked out before she revised her opinions.
I gave you a rare dislike on your post because... well just look Dick:
I'm pro-blockers for transgender children because of MY OWN life experience
^ This is the quote people point to from
this post (thx for digging it up chaos) to say "aha! gotcha!" which is fine, I own it and still do but really; everyone is free to look at the context of the ENTIRE post here but I'll expand it a bit here and now:
Long story short, I'm pro-blockers for transgender children because of MY OWN life experience... it is indeed a huge help to a true transkid. The devil is in the details of accurately determining true transkids from kids with mere identity crisises, autism, peer-pressure etc of course.
Now if we're talking about some virtue-signaling leftist couple who are literally forcing an identity on a kid who exhibits no transgender behaviors just because they are fucked in the head and wanted a girl instead of a boy, then they need to be given a colombian neck-tie behind the planned parenthood building they probably went to in the first place because that IS child abuse.
I very clearly state I accepted the challenge is accurate diagnosis and also clearly state I was very much against evil parents forcing this on their kids (instead of this stemming / originating from the kids themselves). If you don't think
actual transgenderism stems naturally at a young age FROM the child and/or you think it ONLY exists by parents forcing it on normal kids; then you are out of touch with reality... it's that simple.
Fact is, this post (and indeed 99% of ALL my posts) is unedited so I own every word from every post. Again, I very specifically state that the devil is in the details of proper diagnosis. I just didn't know
AT THAT TIME that the discrepancy based on fact-based research was so damn high of
80% of kids who would merely turn out gay / lesbian. The reason the argument lasted for approximately 100 pages is because many of the more radical posters coming in here were trying to get me to just say NO kids EVER should be put on blockers which wasn't going to happen and even now, still hasn't happened and never will because denying the benefit of them in certain extreme cases is denying peer-reviewed, fact-based reality.
THIS is the nuance. It's like some of the more unintelligent of the bunch were seeing me say "research shows blockers are beneficial to true-trans kids" and then spinning that waaaaay overboard to push this absolutely ridiculous narrative that that suddenly meant that I wanted to give every 6 year old hormones. It was like being Cathy Newmanned for page upon page.
Obviously the goal is to
not get non-trans kids (merely kids who will become gay / lesbian after puberty) on drugs. Which is why I will state very clearly again; the best, most rational thing to do for gender incongruent kids is giving them proper love and care and therapy until they are 18 years old to make an adult decision on their own. If you have a child who, even after therapy and doing everything for them as a LOVING parent yet your child is getting worse emotionally and/or suicidal and you're just wanting to "beat the faggot out of them", then it is YOU who have become the monster and are taking part in child abuse. It's that simple.
He still thinks “true” tranny kids should take hormones.
20% of children who show signs of Gender Incongruence / Gender Dysphoria will have Gender Dysphoria persist the rest of their life. This is not "my opinion" this is reality.
If you want to refute clinical research, that is your prerogative but you will just look like an ignorant schlep in the process (which... if the shoe fits...).
Also thinks GD is a mental illness.
What do?
lol the narcissist wants to feel so special. “You’ll never find a more rational mentally ill nut than me.”
Indeed. What do?